|
|
Post by Racial Reality on Mar 8, 2004 9:01:44 GMT -5
I've been thinking why Graeme is so hostile... My guess that when he was visiting USSR he was not considered as white by Russians. Back in the USSR time people like him were labeled "animals" and beaten regularly. Now they're labeled "black-assed" and beaten even more regularly. I gather once he got his levantine ass kicked so hard that all the shit is now in his head. I've been thinking why Rarog is so hostile... My guess that when he was visiting Western Europe he was not considered as white by Western Europeans. Back in the fascist time people like him were labeled "animals" and beaten regularly. Now they're labeled " slant-eyed" and beaten even more regularly. I gather once he got his Mongol-Iranian ass kicked so hard that all the shit is now in his head. ========== Is this really where you want to take the discussion? If so, you might as well just leave now to save yourself from getting thrown out in the near future. |
|
Rarog
Full Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by Rarog on Mar 8, 2004 9:17:02 GMT -5
>>>Frudakis is a geneticist whose conclusions are based on scientific data. His word is valid.
I do not think so.
>>>I haven't made any assertions. I've provided scientific evidence disproving your assertions about Mongoloid ancestry in Southern Europe. Frudakis cites multiple studies, most of which we don't have. What we do have is his professional assessment of the data that he's reviewed. That's more than enough.
Unfortunately, you provided no scientific evidence to back your claims. If you're not aware, scientific evidence is something to be found in scientific publications, to be looked for in scientific journals.
When you'll have one - let me know.
More, available scientific sources, first, confirm that Southern Europeans have Mongoloid DNA, second, that they have more Mongoloid DNA than Russians, and even many times more than majority of Russians.
>>>But unlike Russians, the Spanish and Portuguese don't have any Central Asian or Siberian Y-chromosomes. That's the key difference that you keep ignoring.
I gater you're refering to the TAT-C. Well, when you'll find any scientific evidence in any scientific publication in any scientific journal that TAT-C is the MONGOLOID marker - letme know.
I know you have certain problems, so I'dlike to clarif... the publication has to say something like: "TAT-C is Mongoloid". Got it? I hope so...
>>>Historically, anthropologically and now genetically, it's impossible for Southern Europeans to have more than trace amounts of East Asian admixture.
I agree. 1-2% is nothing.
|
|
Rarog
Full Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by Rarog on Mar 8, 2004 9:51:51 GMT -5
>>>Is this really where you want to take the discussion? If so, you might as well just leave now to save yourself from getting thrown out in the near future.
I'm leaving on my own.
Before I leave I'd like to thank people who tried to reason that animal Graemr. Of course, muds like him can not be reasoned, especially when moderators tolerate (and I believe enjoy... being of similar racial stock) such behavior, being not that far from him on the evolution ladder.
|
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 8, 2004 14:00:39 GMT -5
I've been thinking why Graeme is so hostile... My guess that when he was visiting USSR he was not considered as white by Russians. Back in the USSR time people like him were labeled "animals" and beaten regularly. Now they're labeled "black-assed" and beaten even more regularly. "White" is an American concept, not a European one. Also, I'd like to see evidence of Italians labeled "chernozhopyi," especially in a country so desperate to be a part of the EU. A nation making two to three times as much in per capita GDP can hardly be accused of being full of "black asses." Only in the online world do people think this way. Just remember that the "Levantines" to a great extent built the most beautiful city of the country you so obviously hate and wish to tarnish. Maybe when you are older or have read a little more you will realize how petty and futile these fights were. |
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 8, 2004 20:01:04 GMT -5
I've been thinking why Rarog is so hostile... My guess that when he was visiting Western Europe he was not considered as white by Western Europeans. Back in the fascist time people like him were labeled "animals" and beaten regularly. Now they're labeled " slant-eyed" and beaten even more regularly. I gather once he got his Mongol-Iranian ass kicked so hard that all the shit is now in his head. ========== Is this really where you want to take the discussion? If so, you might as well just leave now to save yourself from getting thrown out in the near future. All I can say to these "Russians" is that they have made a very negative reputation for themselves not just in this forum but in other forums as well. At Skadi the "Russian Nordniks" are very much disliked by the Germans and their underlings, and over here they haven't been too popular. To be fair, they have been targeted with very vicious and unfair attacks -- attacks which I strongly oppose -- but they have brought a lot of the hostilities directed at them through their bully tactics toward certain opponents. I suspect that had the Russians behaved in a more civil manner and openly rebuked those showing unwarranted aggressiveness among their group, they would have made a lot more friends online. There are always the Northwest European racialists whom they can reach out to -- at times they will succeed, and at other times they will not. Some Northwest European Nordicists embrace the depigmentation of certain Slavic groups, whereas to others they have too much of the supposed "Mongoloid." To some, certain Slavs are racial brothers, although the true "Nordics" are found among Germanic types. Thus the Slavs can play at best a peripheral role to their agenda. Those who want to be henchmen or vassals for a nationalistic cause -- like the Slavs who collaborated with the Nazis while the Nazis raped and slaughtered their kinsmen/women -- will obviously be welcomed by the phenotype obsessionals. It's the luck of the draw with these types -- some will embrace Slavs and some will not. Southern Europeans who embrace White Nationalism face a similar predicament -- some will embrace them and consider them as brothers and some will hide their contempt at their joining the movement. The reason why Westernized Slavs or partial-Slavs or fake-Slavs are so quick to embrace the Nordicist movement is because in America the racial system is oversimplified to White vs. Black -- so Nordicism presents a slight modification or move to complexity from this very simplistic system. The system, however, ignores the centuries of bitter wars and hatreds in the European mainland, which the peoples there cannot and will not forget. Americans in general are too myopic to see the things going on in other continents, and don't care to read much about history. Even the so-called "Kelto-Germanic" alliance is doomed to failure, because there is still bitterness between the Brits and the Irish in Europe. Among racialists in the U.S. today, there are people who believe the Irish are intellectually and culturally inferior to the Germanic elements. In a Nordicist state, with a pecking order theoretically only concerned with depigmentation, we can be sure that the Irish would be at the lowest rungs, despite the big mouths and open fetishism for Irish women in certain racialist groups. Even the Alpines are frequently slighted, accused of lacking creativity and of being inferior to the Nordics and even Mediterraneans. Well, sorry to burst bubbles, but the Germans and Frenchmen are largely Alpinid, and they have produced far more culture than the supposed 70% Hallstatt Swedes. These phenotypic movements are vulnerable to the truth, because they don't have legs to stand on. They deserve to be mercilessly beaten and ridiculed with refutations, so the insolence of people believing they are superior because they are depigmented or born in a certain geographic area can end once and for all. It's also important to unmask the hidden motives behind these movements, such as the nationalistic causes they support, which work against the interests of many seemingly attracted to these movements. |
|
|
|
Post by Racial Reality on Mar 9, 2004 8:24:36 GMT -5
Who cares what you think? All that matters is what Frudakis thinks. Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Stop, you're killing me!  Exactly. Later. |
|
|
|
Post by ProdigalSon on Mar 9, 2004 11:31:13 GMT -5
I don't know what the Russians thought of my looks, all I know is that they couldn't keep their hands off my privates. Yes, I am sure that the foreceable removal of your genitals in response to your animal-like behavior was perceived by you as a compliment to your sexual prowess. No, you look like the shit-tanned Levantine mongrel that you are, and would fit in best in your ancestors' homeland, Arabia. Sicilians do not look like Europeans. Yes, they are your swarthy racial kin, foreign racial invaders in a white country, just like you. |
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Mar 9, 2004 11:41:28 GMT -5
Okay, this thread has outlived its usefulness.
|
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 9, 2004 14:37:33 GMT -5
Okay, this thread has outlived its usefulness. I agree. I also deleted one of Graeme's posts. Trolling should not be allowed just because the person doing it is a "Med." |
|
