|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Jan 17, 2006 0:17:30 GMT -5
Is this a roman nose? It looks bulbous and a lot of Sicilians and Greeks have it.  Some moroccan jews have this bulbousy nose shape as well.  Roman nose is like Charlton Heston's nose. |
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Jan 17, 2006 0:41:23 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by One Humanity on Jan 17, 2006 4:48:34 GMT -5
Foreign types in Sweden after Lundborg:  |
|
|
|
Post by magneto on Jan 18, 2006 10:21:15 GMT -5
Roman/Eagle Nose?  |
|
|
|
Post by One Humanity on Jan 18, 2006 12:06:38 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 18, 2006 12:20:36 GMT -5
 John Lennon's one of the very few Europeans with the truly Middle Eastern hooked nose. If you darkened his auburn hair and threw Arab clothes on him, nobody would think he stood out in a crowd of Saudi oil tycoons.  Your saying ff you darkened him he'd look Saudi? Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha... |
|
|
|
Post by Narcissus on Jan 21, 2006 22:12:02 GMT -5
I have always thought that two of the best examples of the "Roman" Nose could be found on the faces of the two foes of Napoleon at Waterloo: Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, and Field Marshall von Bluecher of Prussia.   |
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 21, 2006 22:27:19 GMT -5
Arthur Wellesley seems to be a perfect match going after that picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by ndrthl on Jan 22, 2006 15:39:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 22, 2006 16:11:04 GMT -5
Kissingers nose is fleshier and in detail of different form though similarities are present.
|
|
vingul
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by vingul on Jan 25, 2006 22:29:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Faelcind on Jan 26, 2006 4:14:17 GMT -5
I can't be leave how many keystrokes have been wasted debating the anthropological signficance of the terms roman and jewish nose, to people really think that much thought went into the origin of either term. The both imply a convex nose cause their associated with both groups its that simple. Their also associated with native americans, eagles and hooks. Christ people do people of roman descent genereal have different nose shape then jewish people sure. But the two terms both just mean convex nose its that simple.
|
|
vingul
Junior Member
Posts: 87
|
Post by vingul on Jan 26, 2006 6:58:13 GMT -5
I can't be leave how many keystrokes have been wasted debating the anthropological signficance of the terms roman and jewish nose, to people really think that much thought went into the origin of either term. The both imply a convex nose cause their associated with both groups its that simple. Their also associated with native americans, eagles and hooks. Christ people do people of roman descent genereal have different nose shape then jewish people sure. But the two terms both just mean convex nose its that simple. The amount of though that has gone into it is irrelevant. There's no denying that we are dealing with two clearly different concepts here. I have no problem recognizing either type, the two are quite different from one another. But this is really a matter of esthetics and folklore, rather than anthropology. |
|
Atreyu
Junior Member
I am Atreyu with the Plains people who hunt the purple buffalo
Posts: 79
|
Post by Atreyu on Jan 26, 2006 7:05:33 GMT -5
I can't be leave how many keystrokes have been wasted debating the anthropological signficance of the terms roman and jewish nose, to people really think that much thought went into the origin of either term. The both imply a convex nose cause their associated with both groups its that simple. Their also associated with native americans, eagles and hooks. Christ people do people of roman descent genereal have different nose shape then jewish people sure. But the two terms both just mean convex nose its that simple. Amen. |
|
|
|
Post by ndrthl on Feb 1, 2006 16:47:37 GMT -5
|
|
