|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 6, 2006 18:30:16 GMT -5
So Canada doesen't have a history Caucasoid organized crime like America has with the Albanians,Italians,Jews,the Irish,etc.So organized crime in Canada is made up entirely of Negroids and Mongoloids. Too funny! ;D ;D Canada is a very different country than the united states. And after all america is the home of the gangster. "Only in the U.S.A. is it possible for criminals to become world famous gangsters, the guests of mayors and police chiefs, who give interviews for journalists from newspapers with circulations in the millions in which they give their opinions on the questions of the day."
|
|
|
Post by greatness on Jan 6, 2006 22:09:55 GMT -5
In Canada, the Hells Angels are the largest and most prolific organized crime group, and are White. In Quebec they were involved in a turf war with a Quebecor motorcycle gang called the 'Rock Machine' during which some 150 people, including innocent passers-by died. The Angels fairly much run British Columbian crime, controlling the supply of drugs like heroin and cocaine and others to a lesser extent. The triads operate more within Sino-Canadian communities, not really affecting other Canadians. The East Indian gangs almost always murder their own during gang warfare, etc. Gun violence began as a result of their gangs, which come from affluent families. Indo-Canadians are more of an annoyance to other Canadians. They go after and treat White girls with disrespect in nightclubs (usually resulting in them getting thrown out), and cause fights, etc. Generally, non-White violence is confined to its specific group. However, when it expands the authorities get involved as in the case of Toronto's Boxing Day shootings where a White girl was shot dead. Non-White crime groups heighten the danger in certain areas for Canadians, but usually their violence only hurts their own kind and shows up on national statistics. I'd like to see the news story of the innocent people in quebec being killed. Rock machine, bandidos, HA kill each other and they do it in a manner that facilitates not getting caught. I've never heard of these passer-by deaths. Here where I live, the Alberta Tarsands, we have a huge market for drugs becuase the hordes of workers that do little other than work and whom are all extremely wealthy since the plants pay very well. We have the HA in town and no doubt most of the drugs come from them, they recently built a large strip club and another club and I have yet to hear of one instance of them even getting pinched for selling drugs, let alone violence or theft or something like that. On the other hand amerindian gangs with stupid names like "indian posse" and "alberta warriors", pose a very tangebile threat. I should know since my frinds cousin was stabbed to death by one of them after they raided a bush party. This was the exact same as when I lived with my father in Burnaby where almost all of the same low life crimes were commited by south asians, never did I hear about the russian mafia and their criminal rages. I'd expect it would be the same in toronto, only the torch would be passed to blacks. This was the guy I was talking about. www.fortmcmurraytoday.com/obits_results.php?keyword=thomas&order_by=dateofdeath&pos=0&id=13824#13824OMG here we go again with minorities are all criminals. "White" people have their fare share of crime and killings of innocent bystanders. Its not just blacks. Everyone should read Fredrick Douglas's autobiography before calling blacks Gangsta criminals and blaming them for their own poverty. If ur ancestors were treated in such a manner would your ppl be any better off? I doubt it. And its sad that Natives attacked and killed ur friends cousin. But this is how Natives feel, 50 million were exterminated in the USA alone. The stereotype of rich, native casino owners is far over played IMO, yes there are some, but most are dirt-poor and struggling ppl.
|
|
|
Post by dodona79 on Jan 6, 2006 22:18:42 GMT -5
It's a safe bet that Black immigrants (and I stress immigrants) are responsible for an increase in violent crime in Toronto. Canada is the greatest country in the world to live in, in terms of safety, tolerance, opportunity - we have the right balance. Thus, there is no excuse for any non-White group in Canada to engage in crime and then blame it on social prejudice. If anything, homosexuals are the most villified people in this country and yet they are not murdering, stealing, raping, defrauding, etc. As far as immigrant criminals are concerned: 'kick the buggers out.' HOMOS MURDER?
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 6, 2006 23:56:46 GMT -5
I'd like to see the news story of the innocent people in quebec being killed. Rock machine, bandidos, HA kill each other and they do it in a manner that facilitates not getting caught. I've never heard of these passer-by deaths. Here where I live, the Alberta Tarsands, we have a huge market for drugs becuase the hordes of workers that do little other than work and whom are all extremely wealthy since the plants pay very well. We have the HA in town and no doubt most of the drugs come from them, they recently built a large strip club and another club and I have yet to hear of one instance of them even getting pinched for selling drugs, let alone violence or theft or something like that. On the other hand amerindian gangs with stupid names like "indian posse" and "alberta warriors", pose a very tangebile threat. I should know since my frinds cousin was stabbed to death by one of them after they raided a bush party. This was the exact same as when I lived with my father in Burnaby where almost all of the same low life crimes were commited by south asians, never did I hear about the russian mafia and their criminal rages. I'd expect it would be the same in toronto, only the torch would be passed to blacks. This was the guy I was talking about. www.fortmcmurraytoday.com/obits_results.php?keyword=thomas&order_by=dateofdeath&pos=0&id=13824#13824OMG here we go again with minorities are all criminals. "White" people have their fare share of crime and killings of innocent bystanders. Its not just blacks. Everyone should read Fredrick Douglas's autobiography before calling blacks Gangsta criminals and blaming them for their own poverty. If ur ancestors were treated in such a manner would your ppl be any better off? I doubt it. And its sad that Natives attacked and killed ur friends cousin. But this is how Natives feel, 50 million were exterminated in the USA alone. The stereotype of rich, native casino owners is far over played IMO, yes there are some, but most are dirt-poor and struggling ppl. You're a hypocrite anti-European racist. The land which is now modern day Canada only inhabited between 50-100,000, the later being a conservative estimate, America had a population roughly equal, possibly even less. So even if we had killed every native in existence the "genocide" would've been 200,000 at the most, which is 1/250th of 50,000,000. What could be sadder than having to use fabricated allegations-- that are absurd to a ridiculous degree-- to "prove" races are equal and that any gaps are related to Europeans being evil, as you were saying they were/are. What a f*cked up world that could label a person posting truth about the racial divide, an ignorant hater. Meanwhile considering sleazy people with inferiority complexes who fabricates hate-motivated and hate-inciting bullshit, as being the victims of "hate". It's time to take some personal responsibility and stop with the fabricating of hate-inciting agitprop. Indians haven't done anything positive for europeans settlers, on the other hand we have for them, and continue to this day. Even with their medley of rights (that surge above mine) they still live in squalor simultaneously excel in crime, which is explained away with invented discrimination and false history, like all minorities do, save some far east asians.
|
|
|
Post by phrost on Jan 7, 2006 15:39:02 GMT -5
I find CISC and RCMP alot more credible than what you have said. Right. "CSIS says that there are somewhere between five and 150 criminal organizations operating in Canada" That statement seethes in credibility That particular article didnt come from CISC and was probably a typo. Like I said check out the CISC and RCMP crime statistic website. BTW Its CISC NOT CSIS we are talking about here. CISC and CSIS are different agencies.
|
|
|
Post by phrost on Jan 7, 2006 15:40:26 GMT -5
It's a safe bet that Black immigrants (and I stress immigrants) are responsible for an increase in violent crime in Toronto. Canada is the greatest country in the world to live in, in terms of safety, tolerance, opportunity - we have the right balance. Thus, there is no excuse for any non-White group in Canada to engage in crime and then blame it on social prejudice. If anything, homosexuals are the most villified people in this country and yet they are not murdering, stealing, raping, defrauding, etc. As far as immigrant criminals are concerned: 'kick the buggers out.' HOMOS MURDER? I'm sure there are a few closeted ones. Maybe serial killer Jeffrey Dalmer might have been one?
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 7, 2006 16:37:04 GMT -5
OMG here we go again with minorities are all criminals. "White" people have their fare share of crime and killings of innocent bystanders. Its not just blacks. Everyone should read Fredrick Douglas's autobiography before calling blacks Gangsta criminals and blaming them for their own poverty. If ur ancestors were treated in such a manner would your ppl be any better off? I doubt it. And its sad that Natives attacked and killed ur friends cousin. But this is how Natives feel, 50 million were exterminated in the USA alone. The stereotype of rich, native casino owners is far over played IMO, yes there are some, but most are dirt-poor and struggling ppl. You're a hypocrite anti-European racist. The land which is now modern day Canada only inhabited between 50-100,000, the later being a conservative estimate, America had a population roughly equal, possibly even less. So even if we had killed every native in existence the "genocide" would've been 200,000 at the most, which is 1/250th of 50,000,000. What could be sadder than having to use fabricated allegations-- that are absurd to a ridiculous degree-- to "prove" races are equal and that any gaps are related to Europeans being evil, as you were saying they were/are. What a f*cked up world that could label a person posting truth about the racial divide, an ignorant hater. Meanwhile considering sleazy people with inferiority complexes who fabricates hate-motivated and hate-inciting bullshit, as being the victims of "hate". It's time to take some personal responsibility and stop with the fabricating of hate-inciting agitprop. Indians haven't done anything positive for europeans settlers, on the other hand we have for them, and continue to this day. Even with their medley of rights (that surge above mine) they still live in squalor simultaneously excel in crime, which is explained away with invented discrimination and false history, like all minorities do, save some far east asians. I agree with much of that...
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 7, 2006 17:49:27 GMT -5
I'm sure there are a few closeted ones. Maybe serial killer Jeffrey Dalmer might have been one? Dahmer, actually.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Jan 7, 2006 18:02:33 GMT -5
Ofcourse Homos murder what the hell kind of question is that.
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jan 7, 2006 18:03:40 GMT -5
Ever notice that whites have a near-lock on serial killers? Blacks will generally murder for money, turf-wars, there will be crimes of passion; but, generally, they don't kill for killing's sake. The same holds for most other races around the world. I don't think it's a racial phenomenon--and that Caucasoids are somehow defective--but, rather, that Europeans have built massive cities, which creates anti-social phenomena unknown to less-developed parts of the world (where everyone knows their neighbors). The anthropologist Desmond Morris wrote an interesting book called The Human Zoo about the psychotic-effects of cities, and how people living in them revert to the behavior of caged animals.
One reads about how the Maya had large cities, too; and the Aztecs. They also had bloody rituals and human sacrifice. Was this a sort of psychological release mechanism to prevent serial-killing? Look at the Middle East: Wherever cities were built, ritualistic killing followed closely in its train. Same thing in Greece and Rome. At the beginning of the Iliad Agammemnon sacrifices his own daughter to "ensure a successful military campaign" and anoints the boats with her blood. Even centuries later, by the time of the Romans, Julius Caesar ritualitistically killed people [usually captives from an opposing army]. As "advanced" as we'd like to think of these socities, they still had a foot firmly planted in the dark, primeval past. When ritualistic sacrifice was removed from these large urban areas, suddenly serial killing started happening--like in 19th Century London. It took 8 centuries since the fall of Rome for a city to make it back up to the million-person mark. It happened in London, and soon thereafter came Jack the Ripper. In America, too, serial killing only started happening in the cities. With increased population, anonymity, psychological pressures, etc., killing erupted. It's fascinating to note that serial killing was kept in check by lynch-mobs and public executions. Once those were suppressed, however, there was no way to vent the pervasive anger and pent-up anti-socialism. So serial killers soon came to fill the void.
P.S.--I've never before thought of the human sacrifices of "primitive socities" as a safety-valve to prevent random killing; but now--in following this train of thought--I'm starting to wonder.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Jan 7, 2006 18:11:17 GMT -5
To be fair most Caucasoids who are serial killers are of Northern European descent.Not too many serial killers in America have been Italian,Jewish,Greek,Slavic,Lebanese,etc.Most American serial killers are your typical wonderbread Irish/German/English/Scotch Irish Americans.
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 7, 2006 18:45:08 GMT -5
How is that "being fair"? That seems nothing but misrepresentative seeing as how "Italian, Jewish, Greek, Slavic, Lebanese, etc" ethnicities are far less common than Northern European ancestry here.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 7, 2006 20:27:50 GMT -5
Ever notice that whites have a near-lock on serial killers? Blacks will generally murder for money, turf-wars, there will be crimes of passion; but, generally, they don't kill for killing's sake. The same holds for most other races around the world. I don't think it's a racial phenomenon--and that Caucasoids are somehow defective--but, rather, that Europeans have built massive cities, which creates anti-social phenomena unknown to less-developed parts of the world (where everyone knows their neighbors). The anthropologist Desmond Morris wrote an interesting book called The Human Zoo about the psychotic-effects of cities, and how people living in them revert to the behavior of caged animals. One reads about how the Maya had large cities, too; and the Aztecs. They also had bloody rituals and human sacrifice. Was this a sort of psychological release mechanism to prevent serial-killing? Look at the Middle East: Wherever cities were built, ritualistic killing followed closely in its train. Same thing in Greece and Rome. At the beginning of the Iliad Agammemnon sacrifices his own daughter to "ensure a successful military campaign" and anoints the boats with her blood. Even centuries later, by the time of the Romans, Julius Caesar ritualitistically killed people [usually captives from an opposing army]. As "advanced" as we'd like to think of these socities, they still had a foot firmly planted in the dark, primeval past. When ritualistic sacrifice was removed from these large urban areas, suddenly serial killing started happening--like in 19th Century London. It took 8 centuries since the fall of Rome for a city to make it back up to the million-person mark. It happened in London, and soon thereafter came Jack the Ripper. In America, too, serial killing only started happening in the cities. With increased population, anonymity, psychological pressures, etc., killing erupted. It's fascinating to note that serial killing was kept in check by lynch-mobs and public executions. Once those were suppressed, however, there was no way to vent the pervasive anger and pent-up anti-socialism. So serial killers soon came to fill the void. P.S.--I've never before thought of the human sacrifices of "primitive socities" as a safety-valve to prevent random killing; but now--in following this train of thought--I'm starting to wonder. Thats not true. by proportion they're similar. White society not taking heed to black lust killers killing fellow blacks, and the fact that it isn't extremrely disproportinoate like say murder during robbery, makes it come off as such. But there are plenty of black serial killers. They just don't dominate the headlines and have movies made about them.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 7, 2006 20:30:55 GMT -5
How is that "being fair"? That seems nothing but misrepresentative seeing as how "Italian, Jewish, Greek, Slavic, Lebanese, etc" ethnicities are far less common than Northern European ancestry here. It's not. He has an axe to grind.
|
|
Mr dark
Full Member
I can make your wishes come true
Posts: 127
|
Post by Mr dark on Jan 7, 2006 20:31:01 GMT -5
Ever notice that whites have a near-lock on serial killers? Blacks will generally murder for money, turf-wars, there will be crimes of passion; but, generally, they don't kill for killing's sake. The same holds for most other races around the world. I don't think it's a racial phenomenon--and that Caucasoids are somehow defective--but, rather, that Europeans have built massive cities, which creates anti-social phenomena unknown to less-developed parts of the world (where everyone knows their neighbors). The anthropologist Desmond Morris wrote an interesting book called The Human Zoo about the psychotic-effects of cities, and how people living in them revert to the behavior of caged animals. One reads about how the Maya had large cities, too; and the Aztecs. They also had bloody rituals and human sacrifice. Was this a sort of psychological release mechanism to prevent serial-killing? Look at the Middle East: Wherever cities were built, ritualistic killing followed closely in its train. Same thing in Greece and Rome. At the beginning of the Iliad Agammemnon sacrifices his own daughter to "ensure a successful military campaign" and anoints the boats with her blood. Even centuries later, by the time of the Romans, Julius Caesar ritualitistically killed people [usually captives from an opposing army]. As "advanced" as we'd like to think of these socities, they still had a foot firmly planted in the dark, primeval past. When ritualistic sacrifice was removed from these large urban areas, suddenly serial killing started happening--like in 19th Century London. It took 8 centuries since the fall of Rome for a city to make it back up to the million-person mark. It happened in London, and soon thereafter came Jack the Ripper. In America, too, serial killing only started happening in the cities. With increased population, anonymity, psychological pressures, etc., killing erupted. It's fascinating to note that serial killing was kept in check by lynch-mobs and public executions. Once those were suppressed, however, there was no way to vent the pervasive anger and pent-up anti-socialism. So serial killers soon came to fill the void. P.S.--I've never before thought of the human sacrifices of "primitive socities" as a safety-valve to prevent random killing; but now--in following this train of thought--I'm starting to wonder. Thats not true. by proportion they're similar. White society not taking heed to black lust killers killing fellow blacks, and the fact that it isn't extremrely disproportinoate like say murder during robbery, makes it come off as such. But there are plenty of black serial killers. They just don't dominate the headlines and have movies made about them. what are you doing about besides running your mouth?
|
|