|
Post by Mike the Jedi on Dec 15, 2005 13:17:27 GMT -5
Oh, nothing much. Just the usual antics. You haven't missed a whole lot.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 15, 2005 14:47:48 GMT -5
Black piece of crap is too nice. Here some handy work by the negroid waste of skin subhuman murderer, that you for some reason have an affinity towards.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 15, 2005 14:55:39 GMT -5
[/li][li]Approximately 60% of American Indian victims of violence, about the same percentage as of all victims of violence, described the offender as white. [/li][li]When asked the race of their offender,American Indian victims of violent crime primarily said the offender was white (57%), followed by other race (34%) and black (9%). [/li][li]In 66% of the violent crimes in which the race of the offender was reported, American Indian victims indicated the offender was either white or black (table 13). Nearly 4 in 5 American Indian victims of rape/sexual assault described the offender as white. About 3 in 5 American Indian victims of robbery (57%), aggravated assault(58%), and simple assault (55%) described the offender as white. In contrast [/li][li]The offender was described as black for about 1 in 10 incidents of rapes/ sexual assaults (8%), aggravated assaults (10%), and simple assault(9%), and about 2 in 5 robberies(17%) against American Indian victims (figure 2). So using this logic I can say whites are more prone to criminality because they commit far more crimes against Native Americans than blacks, yeah, great logic isn't it? Lets compare white-on-white to black-on-white crime using stats and sources from the DOJ and not racist nonsense from Amren and Jared Taylor. You regurgitate the same nonsense. How about some overall factuall stats and comparisons from the DOJ: On interracial crime - 80% of black violent crime is black on black while black-on-white crime accounts for just 12% of black crime - 70% of white violent crime is white-on-white, while white-on-black crime accounts for 18% of white crime www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/aic.pdfin view of this data above from the official DOJ crime stats, this statement: Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black. Is a lie, quit copying pasting jared Taylor's nonsense from amren.[/quote] Of course he's lying. He hatefilled, right? Perhaps, in ideed he is a racist, there might be a reason for it? Like these statistics perhaps! Give me some proof his study was indeed lies, rather than just calling him a "racist" and expecting everyone to disregard it becuase you called him a "racist". Typical. It seems like you're fullfilling exactly what I had previously stated.
|
|
|
Post by betrand on Dec 15, 2005 15:15:36 GMT -5
Your responses are not worth replying to. you saw the stats I posted and the sorces now deal with it.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 15, 2005 15:47:05 GMT -5
Steven Truscott is a case that should and is regarded as a railroading from people looking for blood. This guy was a black violent criminal gang banging leech of society, scratch that, these gangster criminals are far worse than leeches, they're a scourge that should be done away with. He's a black violent criminal that bought a shot gun and murdered 4 people--( I guess for duck hunting in the city, huh?) and is now being regarded by some, as being somehow himself done in by the evil judges, prosecutors, governors, and white society in general. When in truth, it's the complete opposite. www.cbc.ca/fifth/truscott/crime.about.com/od/deathrow/a/tookie6.htm
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 15, 2005 15:50:50 GMT -5
Your responses are not worth replying to. you saw the stats I posted and the sorces now deal with it. Yes with mestizos counted as "white". You were the one that called my stats wrong, with no proof, other than your own contempt for the person whom commissioned it. One thing to add is that Asian Americans are less criminal than Whites, so I guess he's actually a crypto-Asiatic "white" supremacist.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 15, 2005 16:06:37 GMT -5
It wasn't testimonies of rival gang members. It was his three pals who were with him. They were the only witnesses to the crime. You know, the dead don't speak.
I suppose I should be thankful that blacks tend to be isolated from white communities.
Bill Cosby was attacked for addressing real problems in the black community in public. He's one of the few who doesn't pretend it's all the white man's fault. That blacks have high rates of unemployment, crime, drug problems, etc. is something that can't be dealt with by extorting whites. Billions of dollars, since the 60s, have been wasted on the black community. Instead of things getting better they've gotten worse. Instead of trying to extort money from whites black leaders should start focusing on those among their community that cause the problems instead of trying to pass off the blame on whites. Complaing about whites after so much of their tax dollars has been wasted in black ghettos is like being spit on by a beggar after giving him five bucks. Of course, it should be noted that these so called black leaders need to keep up racial animosity so they can cash in.
Guilt for what? I can't be blamed for what other whites have done in the past. Nor can blacks today pretend they're victims for crimes that were not committed against them. Most whites don't have a guilt complex because there is nothing to feel guilty for. Why would an Italian American feel guilty? or a German American? Sillyness. Most whites, in my opinion, feel resentment for being blamed for something taht isn't their fault.
Incorrect.
I agree.
Latinos have a very high crime rate. How would this not boost the white crime rate? This is done on purpose. If all Latinos were considered white they wouldn't be given a separate category regarding hate crimes.
Yes, but crimes against whites by blacks is at a much higher rate than crimes committed by whites on blacks, which is telling.
Some people are predisposed to committing crimes but this is a minority of the population as a whole. What does lead to crime is cultural and the black ghetto culture glorifies poor behavior.
I don't like Bill Bennett but I have to say you took his quote out of context (like so many). Bill Bennett is against abortion, for one. That includes for blacks and whites. He was taking a jab at "liberals."
But it does prove that there is something wrong. This doesn't just mean reagrding blacks but also takes into account the high crime rate of whites in Appalachia. There is something wrong and it must be dealt with.
Correct.
White crime exists since we all suffer from the flaws of our human nature but it's quite small. You don't see a sea of white faces at Rikers Island. You haven't taken into account that there are 6 times more white people than black but yet blacks make a huge portion of the violent crimes committed. That most of those crimes are against other blacks doesn't make me sigh with relief. It just makes me glad they're isolated. Same with whites from Appalachia. I'm glad they don't live next door to me.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Dec 15, 2005 18:17:25 GMT -5
When do "whites" not look at themselves? Whites that murder people get treated as murderers as well. Crime is a big problem, however, when you throw a mix of other ethnicities in the muddle, it potentiates the problem immensely.
I haven't done jack to anyone, yet, contrary to what you say, I do pay. The Indians in my country are given many rights that other citizens simply don't have, and would be prosecuted for breaching. They also are given large amounts of money to help their "situation" even when the money at best is a quick fix and at worst, acts as fuel to the fire. All because "I" represent the group that stole "their land", notwithstanding the fact that it wasn't theft anymore than if it had been done by rival tribe, which is exactly what European settlers represented : rivals. Any accusation of thievery essentially admits that whites are superior to Indians. Now, After having defeated the natives, we have to recognize the defeat as "theft" and give them a slough of prerogatives that are unlawful to all others. Just because we were essentially better, just as the Mongols had been in Russia. The difference is that Europeans continued to bloom, whereas the Mongols never.
It's absurd. The savages, were the most cynical human beings to exist; cynicism that was so acute that they couldn't even reach beyond their own family unit, let alone create a nation to fulfill their selfishness, like say the golden horde. Yet whites are mutually agreed as being the cynical ones, even amongst whites whom have a distorted view of their history and the history of others.
I grantee, if they had been stronger and won, or if they had invaded Europe and won, their subjects wouldn't be alive. And certainly wouldn't give the rights that they have been given.
Why would people who believe in an anti-black conspiracy have a guilt complex? More like an inferiority complex. Thats exactly what it is, inferiority and hate. I had the displeasure of reading part of a book called "The Debt : What America Owes to Blacks" by Randall Robinson, at my public library. This author is supposedly described as a "civil rights" activist (at least in the introduction to his book). Which is in stark contrast to what he is in reality: hate filled and resentful, whom isn't even capable of hiding his hate when writing a book. Yet you label people like Jared Taylor as the "extremists" and "hateful". Classic!
American PC is twisted, him being called a "civil rights" activist and Jared Taylor a "hate filled racist" (pejorative) is tantamount to pigs flying.
You just said: "I think the white man has as much a guilt complex" so obviously, you do.
You think that white people that live in non-black communities shouldn't be concerned, and no they shouldn't be, however, how about all the whites that live in large black communities like Washington DC or Detroit? Should other whites not be concerned about those people? Likewise for white farmers in South Africa, being murdered becuase they're white. YOu think I don't have the right to acknowledge this because south African blacks don't pose a threat to me personally?
Whatever. Black crime is an issue, it's an issue that's suppressed and swept under the PC rug. People just don't want to deal with it. Terrorism is blown out of proportion and is less an issue than black crime, yet what do you hear every time you turn on the TV. And when you do hear about blacks and crime, it's always some "victim" black screaming bloody murder for being profiled by the "White man", because they're hateful, and not because blacks as a group commit more crime. Or some self hating whites defending a scum bag murderer, by proxy for blacks. That only fuels black disdain and hence crime.
The populations aren't the same size! Blacks are more criminal, a criminality predisposed by race, not socio-economics like is commonly claimed. That's the moot point. The only thing over represented in media, is scum bags like this guy and this overwhelming public support. Which should've been a blurb in the 6:00 news about "justice served".
HUH? Ignore white crime? Wheres the white death row inmate thats been found guilty and has as much support and media attention, as this gang member convicted murderer had?
This guy and his supporters is all I had heard on the media, other than one short interview with the step mother of one of the victims, whom seemed to be the only person who wasn't completely out her mind. And you say blacks are overrepresented in responsibility, and underrepresented in media fairness?
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Dec 15, 2005 19:28:01 GMT -5
Duke!
Charlie Bass is a troll who attempts to talk smart,but lacks even the slightest inkling of Truth or even the remotest semblance of human intelligence . He is a repeatedly banned member on many boards, with multiple online names and personalities,in other words a schizophrenic backetcase!
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 15, 2005 19:32:33 GMT -5
Some people say Blacks have more testerone than Whites and Asians on average thats why they commit more crimes.Crimson do you think that could be an explanation.
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Dec 15, 2005 19:34:18 GMT -5
Here''s another study on Blacks: www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2002/08/28/MN238272.DTLJust goes to show Negroid's are a crime & violence prone race,always have been backwards & primitive...whites no matter what they do to help Blacks,they will always turn out soar as Observation, History and numerious studies and facts indicate and point to all to often . Bass is just trying to cover up the facts,like usual. Tony,no i dont ...Its Imbedded in their genetic makeup, and their behavioral pattern. Even their intelligence(IQ) is extremly low on Human charts.Coincidence? not at all!
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 15, 2005 22:12:42 GMT -5
Hey Crimson Guard there's a city here in Northern California called Richmond where almost everyday on the local news they show incidents of gang shooting involving Black youths.Richmond has one of the highest homicide rates in the country and Richmond just happens to have a very large Black population which is just slightly under 40%.Notice that any city in the U.S where Blacks are over 30% of the population are plagued with a high crime rate.
|
|
|
Post by aroundtheworld on Dec 15, 2005 22:47:53 GMT -5
I can't believe I have just stepped into a KKK meeting. :oThis is disgusting. "All blacks have low IQ's. All Black are pre-dispositioned to crime and murder. All blacks are violent". I cannot believe you all claim to be educated and rational but are spewing so much hatred and false information. You all claim that it's not socioecomonics and that it's been proven that black are just "programmed" to be violent. That's a bunch of bull. When is the last time you saw a violent gang of black college graduates or professionals? Middle class blacks aren't even remotely in the same class as this group of exaggerated "sub-human negroid scum" that you all speak of. You all are speaking with so much anger and hatred and basing this off of "news" and "statistics" which are about as valid as a Fox News Poll. When Colin Powell comes to your town, you'd better run b/c he might decide to murder some people. I guess that Wayne Brady scares you all, too because he is black therefore has high testosterone and a low IQ and is extremely violent. Yeah we know just how violent Whoopi Goldberg is...and that Oprah Winfrey...boy low IQ woman just leaches from the "white man" like it's no tomorrow.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Dec 15, 2005 22:55:42 GMT -5
Aroundthworld what percentage of the population is Black where you live.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Dec 15, 2005 23:15:18 GMT -5
I can't believe I have just stepped into a KKK meeting. :oThis is disgusting. "All blacks have low IQ's. All Black are pre-dispositioned to crime and murder. All blacks are violent". I cannot believe you all claim to be educated and rational but are spewing so much hatred and false information. You all claim that it's not socioecomonics and that it's been proven that black are just "programmed" to be violent. That's a bunch of bull. When is the last time you saw a violent gang of black college graduates or professionals? Middle class blacks aren't even remotely in the same class as this group of exaggerated "sub-human negroid scum" that you all speak of. You all are speaking with so much anger and hatred and basing this off of "news" and "statistics" which are about as valid as a Fox News Poll. When Colin Powell comes to your town, you'd better run b/c he might decide to murder some people. I guess that Wayne Brady scares you all, too because he is black therefore has high testosterone and a low IQ and is extremely violent. Yeah we know just how violent Whoopi Goldberg is...and that Oprah Winfrey...boy low IQ woman just leaches from the "white man" like it's no tomorrow. Midlde class blacks are fine with me since they wouldn't be middle class if they didn't have the good values that leads to such financial success. But we shouldn't pretend black crime doesn't exist, or isn't a burden on society. Blacks do tend to have lower IQs on average than any other race. This doesn't mean superiority of one group over another. You can be a genius and be a burden on society. You can also have a low IQ and be a respected member of society. I don't look down on people based on intelligence, wealth, etc. I judge a person based on their morals. If they live life without being a nuisance to anyone else they should be respected. The problem is that people with lower IQs tend be more criminally oriented. In the past religion and the community (by shaming people) was what curbed this impulse. In the black community religion has little influence on the young and shaming people is non- existant. I'm not a big fan of religion since it's irrational but I have to admit it does keep people in check. But I prefer "shaming people." People are much less likely to misbehave if others in the neighborhood are going to give the offender the cold shoulder. Wayne Brady is cool with me. The other two are hags.
|
|