|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 21, 2004 6:38:01 GMT -5
I was just reading Refuting Racial Myths, and I realized that the treatment of Greeks is way over the line: the Greeks are by far the most maligned Southern European group. The reason for this is because of the great achievements of the Greeks and the lust that some neo-Nazis have for their achievements. It seems the Greeks are attacked in ways that are dishonorable and barbaric. Conclusions are formed by their racialist detractors long before they have even looked at the evidence. The next group would be the Portuguese. Some racialists portray the Portuguese as mulattoes, even if they have never met a Portuguese face to face. Supposedly, significant numbers of Black slaves were absorbed into the Portuguese population during the period in which they engaged in the transatlantic slave trade. The absorption appears to be greatly exaggerated. The third group is Italians. Italians as well are accused of having Negroid and Arabic admixture. What the neo-Nazis claiming that the Roman empire encouraged miscegenation which weakened the racial and intellectual character of the Italians fail to take into account is the rebirth of classical culture during the Renaissance, which occurred in areas which would presumably be affected by such large-scale migrations of non-Europeans as they claim to have occurred. Spaniards are among the least maligned of the Southern European nations, but there is nastiness that comes our way. Some Nordicists even cluster Spaniards with "Central Europeans" (perhaps because of the Upper Paleolithic character of Spaniards). However, I don't feel flattered at all by these pathetic overtures, when fellow Southern European kinsmen are being attacked. So, to recap, the most maligned European countries are: (1) Greece, (2) Portugal, and (3) Italy. The Slavic countries are also maligned, both by Nordicists and by Mediterranean nationalists. So it's not just Southern European countries that are attacked. As far as Northern European nations go, Ireland would be up there. |
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Mar 21, 2004 6:42:02 GMT -5
Actually, I think Anon's 'attack priority' is according to HG9/HG21 frequencies.  The less Paleolithic you are, the more he trashes you. Also, he focuses on Greeks because he feels he has a personal score to settle with Dienekes. |
|
|
|
Post by Tbilisi on Mar 21, 2004 7:33:05 GMT -5
Russia is by far the most attacked nation. All Russians are claimed to be Mongoloid, Ladogan etc and their culture "stolen" if I don't remember wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by Satyros on Mar 21, 2004 7:50:57 GMT -5
I think you have made a mistake. This "Refuting Racial Myths" site is a comedy site. Its puprose is to entertain Anthropology friends. It is controled by a fat drunk cowboy comedian who is the definition of what i would call neo-barbarian.
|
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 21, 2004 10:23:33 GMT -5
Refuting Racial Myths is not only a barbarian, but he is also a psychic. According to his own words, he has no negroid ancestors in the last 40.000 years. One can almost sense that his ancestors developed a strong 6th sense to detect negligible admixture of negroid blood in their partners...
But then again, sheep aren't known to have Negroid blood...
|
|
|
|
Post by Artemidoros on Mar 21, 2004 17:19:12 GMT -5
But then again, sheep aren't known to have Negroid blood... Baah baah blacksheep, have you any wool? Yessir, yessir, three bags full...  |
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 21, 2004 23:29:43 GMT -5
Baah baah blacksheep, have you any wool? Yessir, yessir, three bags full...  I guess I forgot about the black sheep, but I am sure that Anon's ancestors were some of the finest White Nationalist sheep ;D |
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Mar 21, 2004 23:33:20 GMT -5
Does anyone have a pic of this Anus guy?
PS. nevermind, Alex has already posted it ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Artemidoros on Mar 22, 2004 6:05:35 GMT -5
Does anyone have a pic of this Anus guy? PS. nevermind, Alex has already posted it ;D Which one is it? I can only see yews  |
|
|
|
Post by Graeme on Mar 22, 2004 9:49:19 GMT -5
Weren't the Grimaldi skeletons thought to be negroid? And didn't Coon say that the UP types were incipiently mongoloid? No sane person would claim that Europe was free of other races even 40 kya. And alex you mean psycho ie insane.
When the genes and alleles are discovered on nuclear DNA that are actually race formers that give, for example, negroid shaped lips or straight mongoloid hair etc, it will be interesting to see how mixed the pure races are. I am into genetics, race formation and anthrology and I was very surprised that there are so many people into nordicism and labelling other caucasoid sub groups non white or muds. Sicilians and Greeks get a big slice of bigotry followed by other, yes, Mediterranean peoples. Nordicists have always hated slav speakers. Why? Because they can be blonder and lighter skinned than them, and not look Nordic. They spoil their illusions. Southern Europeans do not dislike slav speakers, only those foolish Eastern Europeans wannabes with their point scoring by literally blackening Southerners. It is the pot calling the kettle black, as my mother would say. Who are they trying to kid? Where would Nords be without their Med progenitors? No where and non existent. Anon is not a ewe, but an old goat.
|
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Mar 22, 2004 11:25:26 GMT -5
Weren't the Grimaldi skeletons thought to be negroid? And didn't Coon say that the UP types were incipiently mongoloid? No sane person would claim that Europe was free of other races even 40 kya. And alex you mean psycho ie insane. When the genes and alleles are discovered on nuclear DNA that are actually race formers that give, for example, negroid shaped lips or straight mongoloid hair etc, it will be interesting to see how mixed the pure races are. I am into genetics, race formation and anthrology and I was very surprised that there are so many people into nordicism and labelling other caucasoid sub groups non white or muds. Sicilians and Greeks get a big slice of bigotry followed by other, yes, Mediterranean peoples. Nordicists have always hated slav speakers. Why? Because they can be blonder and lighter skinned than them, and not look Nordic. They spoil their illusions. Southern Europeans do not dislike slav speakers, only those foolish Eastern Europeans wannabes with their point scoring by literally blackening Southerners. It is the pot calling the kettle black, as my mother would say. Who are they trying to kid? Where would Nords be without their Med progenitors? No where and non existent. Anon is not a ewe, but an old goat. Yep, I agree with that ( it's a shame you feel you have to bash eastern Slavs  ) |
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 22, 2004 14:43:52 GMT -5
And alex you mean psycho ie insane. No, I meant "psychic" - someone with paranormal powers. That was the only way Anon could speak for his sheep-shagging ancestors. Southern Europeans do not dislike slav speakers. The Eastern Europeans saved my country from being flooded with north Africans and sub-saharans. They are the most respected foreign colony in my country - and I think I can speak for all the Portuguese on this... |
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 22, 2004 18:45:48 GMT -5
Perhaps I focused too much on Southern European countries. Here are some other maligned nations, and the reason:
Germany, Holocaust guilt
Russia, the Ladogan legend
Sicily, not a nation but the most targeted part of Italy
Outside of Europe:
Saudi Arabia, 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were from there
Israel, hypocritically attacked for defending itself against Muslim terrorists
|
|
|
|
Post by Silveira on Mar 22, 2004 19:02:50 GMT -5
Southern Italians and especially Sicilians are often attacked not simply because of their alleged racial impurities, these are of little or no interest to the average person, but mostly because of their association with the Mafia. Until the barrage of Mafia films produced in the last few decades (which glorify this lifestyle to a certain extent) came about there was a very great stigma attached to this whole topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Mar 22, 2004 19:19:48 GMT -5
In the real world, not in anthropologic boards, I’d have to say Serbians are one of the most maligned of all Europeans.
|
|
)
