|
Post by santana on Mar 15, 2005 2:04:34 GMT -5
because arab men are VERY protective of their women.. i remember this one dude tried to take a picture of this arab woman and her brother was gonna kick the shit out of the guy .. they protect their women fiercely...
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on Mar 15, 2005 2:04:53 GMT -5
Egyptians have little to no Northern European admixture, what exactly are you trying to prove here? No matter how hard you try, Europeans will never view North Africans as the same as them so you're wasting your time trying to prove something to them. He never said they had northern European admixture. He said they were closer to Nords than Negroids. That is undeniably true considering that no survey has shown negroid admixture in Egypt to surpass 13%. Egyptians are a Caucasian people. Get over it.
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on Mar 15, 2005 2:06:05 GMT -5
Why are they always quick to point out ethiopians, somali's and other east africans have "caucosoid" admixture, but get mad when people say upper egyptians may have significant black admixture? There is far more Caucasoid admixture in Ethiopians than black admixture in even Upper Egyptians. Upper Egyptians are far from half-black. It's no coincidence that 0.005% of Afrocentrists have actually been to Egypt.
|
|
|
Post by topdog on Mar 15, 2005 2:17:02 GMT -5
There is far more Caucasoid admixture in Ethiopians than black admixture in even Upper Egyptians. If you're talking about Amhara, then you're correct. Oromo have far less Middle Eastern mixture than Amhara.
|
|
|
Post by topdog on Mar 15, 2005 2:25:48 GMT -5
How is being proud of my Mediterranean heritage (which I undeniably have) equivalent to trying to make false claims about the ancient egyptians and stealing their ancestors. Because your position is extreme. You lumped Southern Europeans, North Africans and Middle Easterners into one big 'Mediterranean race pride' entity while simultaneously separating East and West African as separate races(insert rolling eyes). SEs don't see themselves as the same as MEs and NAs, so in essence you're claiming other peoples civilization by lumping all those three regions together. True, all three sre in the Mediterranean region but they aren't all the same. Conversely, East Africa is in sub-Saharan Africa just as West and central is, but you separate the three.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Mar 15, 2005 8:28:15 GMT -5
It wouldn´t be beneath those street-peddlers to cater for the Afrocentric fantasies of Black American tourists. They´ll call them brothers or Nubians or anything it takes to grab their attention. They know their trade! ![;)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/wink.png)
|
|
|
Post by KLI on Mar 15, 2005 9:07:52 GMT -5
Because your position is extreme. You lumped Southern Europeans, North Africans and Middle Easterners into one big 'Mediterranean race pride' entity while simultaneously separating East and West African as separate races(insert rolling eyes). SEs don't see themselves as the same as MEs and NAs, so in essence you're claiming other peoples civilization by lumping all those three regions together. True, all three sre in the Mediterranean region but they aren't all the same. Conversely, East Africa is in sub-Saharan Africa just as West and central is, but you separate the three. Topdog, why do you rebuke Alexandrian for lumping every body into a ''mediterranean race'' when you lump all West and East Africans together too?
|
|
|
Post by KLI on Mar 15, 2005 9:11:41 GMT -5
Why are they always quick to point out ethiopians, somali's and other east africans have "caucosoid" admixture, but get mad when people say upper egyptians may have significant black admixture? There was quite a bit of arab immigration to east africa. And they screwed the hell outta african women, but they could not have contributed very much genetic material to entire populations of people in retrospect. Such a thing would require mass amounts of ME immigration and intermarriage, which ofcourse was present, but not to the extent they might harp about. P.S. what is it with arab dudes and black women? Why can't black dudes mack on arab or middle eastern women? Minstrel, Arab admixture is exagerrated in East Africans. And Amharas have an earlier Himyaritic (south Arabian) admixrture, not Arab. For example as far as I know there was only a single Arab in my clan's lineage which is 20 generations long
|
|
|
Post by Soomaal on Mar 15, 2005 9:39:17 GMT -5
Minstrel, Arab admixture is exagerrated in East Africans. And Amharas have an earlier Himyaritic (south Arabian) admixrture, not Arab. For example as far as I know there was only a single Arab in my clan's lineage which is 20 generations long Waryaa kani mid aan cagli laheen bu yahay, nacala abu aslak. Same thing here, I count 22 generations to a single arab in my clan. The guy who wrote the retarded crap is not sane, east african woman were f*cked by who, I think you are confused, we Somalis weren't slaved how could anyone try such a thing. You could searh your heart out and you will find Somalis were never slaves, so it would not be possible for our women to be messed with, Somalis are not some docile africans. The only arab genes we have came from marriage and its even documented. LMAO My uncle is married to a qatari woman, arabs aren't that protective of their woman as everybody thinks.
|
|
|
Post by KLI on Mar 15, 2005 10:02:15 GMT -5
Well TBH Arabs seem to be overly protective of their women.
But to me, it seems that the Arab prefers to protect his honour, rather than the actual woman...hence honour killings
|
|
|
Post by Shenuda on Mar 15, 2005 10:02:27 GMT -5
Here is an article of one Afro-American:
|
|
|
Post by Shenuda on Mar 15, 2005 10:05:10 GMT -5
This is funny ... I am not pretty sure what does he mean ...
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on Mar 15, 2005 17:58:13 GMT -5
That man's article is full of fallacies. Most Nubians are not even remotely Christians. Furthermore, he clearly viewed things from a biased eye if he says 75% would be considered black. I'm not surprised they called him Nubian or cousin to sell him something and that isn't a surprise. Nubian, doesn't mean Egyptian so by calling him that they just wanted to draw a connection. Calling him Nubian actually proved that he could be differentiated from actual Egyptians due to his dark skin. Also, they call everyone cousins, "frere francais", or something, its no surprise, they probably meant "African cousin" not "black cousin". Lastly, he even admitted that with his darker, more typically black wife, they were noticeably tourists
Anyway, I don't get the point of posting this one Afro-American's accounts of his trip.
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on Mar 15, 2005 17:59:00 GMT -5
But to me, it seems that the Arab prefers to protect his honour, rather than the actual woman...hence honour killings Especially as you get more conservative, its true. Probably more so in the Gulf than anywhere else.
|
|
|
Post by KLI on Mar 16, 2005 21:03:02 GMT -5
I actually hear its common mostly among Palestinians/Jordanians. Pakistanis and Indians like to douce their women with burning acid to gain back theri 'lost honour'
sickos....
Anyways funny how some people here who froth at the mouth...their eyes glowing red with rage when sub saharan blacks lay even the slightest claim to Egypt...yet at the same time try to explain things off and very lackadaisically when Nordics lay claim to it. LOL at Alex's reverance and awe of that website.
|
|