|
Post by AWAR on Jun 20, 2004 23:48:49 GMT -5
I think this all is a nice illustration on how truth is important. It's ironic, sad and ridiculous that Irish people, the most caucasoid of all caucasoids, the 'whitest' nation on earth were subjected to racism and compared to animals.
Satanization in the name of politics.
|
|
|
Post by captainusa1 on Jun 21, 2004 0:47:07 GMT -5
The funniest part of these grotesque cartoons is that they were depictions made by the Anglo-Saxons who are, by the way, the fathers of the spawn known as nordicism, and who incidentally need to resort to Irish or Scottish Atlantid (Mediterranid) types to be able to present a good looking actor to represent them. To hell with them all. Your bigotry is tiresome. It was the Meds who had the best ancient civilizations. It was the Nords who created the modern world. Give credit where credit is due. It's ironic that you use a Nord creation to insult them. I mean no offense to you, personally, BTW.
|
|
|
Post by ginojda on Jun 21, 2004 1:16:03 GMT -5
Your bigotry is tiresome. It was the Meds who had the best ancient civilizations. It was the Nords who created the modern world. Give credit where credit is due. It's ironic that you use a Nord creation to insult them. I mean no offense to you, personally, BTW. Nords created the Modern World??? The "Modern world" as you call it was created by everybody. Meds, Jews, Nords, Asians, even African Americans. Everybody had a helping hand and without the each other the other one's can't succeed. Same goes for the ancient one's, excluding Asians of course.
|
|
|
Post by captainusa1 on Jun 21, 2004 6:29:05 GMT -5
Nords created the Modern World??? The "Modern world" as you call it was created by everybody. Meds, Jews, Nords, Asians, even African Americans. Everybody had a helping hand and without the each other the other one's can't succeed. Same goes for the ancient one's, excluding Asians of course. I agree with you in that all kinds of people contributed, but the Americans of "Nord" ancestry and the "Nords" played a disproportionate part in discovering and inventing the things that transformed the world. It's also true that the "Meds" had the greatest civilizations during ancient times, although there were advanced civilizations (like China) in other parts of the world. I'm not claiming either group is superior to other groups.
|
|
|
Post by Graeme on Jun 21, 2004 6:54:09 GMT -5
The "Nords" created the modern world eh. Actually a disease started modernism, the black death, if it wasn't for it we would still be in some sort of feudalism today kissing some lord's arse. The black death, Yersina pestis, so reduced the European population that labour became scarse and a commodity to be paid for with money. It totally transformed Europe.
The next big step was the Industrial Revolution which took place in England. The English have a Germanic language much corrupted but they are not Nords. In Europe the Industrialisation was what transformed backwaters like Germany into nations of some note; all because of the English. The Germans aren't Nords either. I don't think Sweden, Norway or Denmark did much for the world.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Jun 21, 2004 10:07:06 GMT -5
I agree with you in that all kinds of people contributed, but the Americans of "Nord" ancestry and the "Nords" played a disproportionate part in discovering and inventing the things that transformed the world. It's also true that the "Meds" had the greatest civilizations during ancient times, although there were advanced civilizations (like China) in other parts of the world. I'm not claiming either group is superior to other groups. The 'Nords' invented the modern world, only if you delude yourself into thinking that every important inventor or historic figure was Nordic by default... no matter where he was born. Nordicists claim Napoleon to be a nord, Mohammad, Jesus, Hitler, Genghis Khan, so, why not anyone else who ever contributed ... right
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Jun 21, 2004 10:08:53 GMT -5
I don't think Sweden, Norway or Denmark did much for the world. Then it must have been Iceland ;D
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Jun 21, 2004 10:15:10 GMT -5
Actually, I think Cap'n is speaking of the modern achievements of Northern/Central Europeans in general, not those of 'Nordics'.
|
|
|
Post by One Humanity on Jun 21, 2004 10:23:04 GMT -5
although there were advanced civilizations (like China) in other parts of the world. Many things were first invented by the Chinese, thousands and hundreds of years before they got into the west/were reinvented there. They just didn't have the intention to revolute the world with it.
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Jun 21, 2004 13:46:22 GMT -5
What are you fools talking about!? Of course Genghis Khan was Nordic!!! Christ, it's not like Russians or Finns have any Asiatic blood in their veins so the conclusion is = Genghis Khan is Nordic, just a more violent branch. Therefore, Nordics conquered the Chinese Empire and much of Eurasia. There's a contribution. Germans are Nordic, but also called 'Huns' by the British. Thus Germans = Huns. Attila destroyed Roman power. Slavs are kind of Nordic, so when they took over Illyria from its native inhabitants they became the dominant people of the Byzantine Empire. And of course Martin Luther not only created Protestantism but at the end of his long life fought for civil rights in America. So if you look around, Nordics have made plenty of contributions. I mean where would Central and Southern Europe be without the creative skills of the Vikings? They created Russia, and Russia became the huge Soviet bloc, a superpower. I'm sorry folx, the logic is faultless.... ;D
|
|
|
Post by Springa on Jun 21, 2004 13:59:30 GMT -5
Joking, right? I mean, I've seen people seriously say things like that, so who knows... What are you fools talking about!? Of course Genghis Khan was Nordic!!! Christ, it's not like Russians or Finns have any Asiatic blood in their veins so the conclusion is = Genghis Khan is Nordic, just a more violent branch. Therefore, Nordics conquered the Chinese Empire and much of Eurasia. There's a contribution. Germans are Nordic, but also called 'Huns' by the British. Thus Germans = Huns. Attila destroyed Roman power. Slavs are kind of Nordic, so when they took over Illyria from its native inhabitants they became the dominant people of the Byzantine Empire. And of course Martin Luther not only created Protestantism but at the end of his long life fought for civil rights in America. So if you look around, Nordics have made plenty of contributions. I mean where would Central and Southern Europe be without the creative skills of the Vikings? They created Russia, and Russia became the huge Soviet bloc, a superpower. I'm sorry folx, the logic is faultless.... ;D
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Jun 21, 2004 14:32:58 GMT -5
Your bigotry is tiresome. It was the Meds who had the best ancient civilizations. It was the Nords who created the modern world. Give credit where credit is due. It's ironic that you use a Nord creation to insult them. I mean no offense to you, personally, BTW. LOL. So typical... it took you guys a while to realize that Nords had nothing to do with Ancient or Classic Civilisations (nor any civilisation for this matter) and that you were being fools as usual with such claims. And now that you know that you were nothing in the past you want to claim the present? What will be next when the laughters about this spread too? The future? Could you now explain what this idiocy has to do with my post, if anything? Your words expose your incredible retardness and they make me suspect you are another nordgamer, another skadi'ite. And, by the way, I mean no personal offense to you. ;D (Edit: on second thoughts there is not only one idiot there, so this one may be one of the many idiots)
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Jun 21, 2004 14:38:21 GMT -5
Mynydd, Cap'n is not Nordhammer. I know him from another board, he's a nice guy.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Jun 21, 2004 14:42:37 GMT -5
Mynydd, Cap'n is not Nordhammer. I know him from another board, he's a nice guy. Which is why I edited it. But who cares? I'm starting to realize that retardness is hard codified in their genes, it is not about isolated cases.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Jun 21, 2004 17:56:50 GMT -5
Which is why I edited it. But who cares? I'm starting to realize that retardness is hard codified in their genes, it is not about isolated cases. Oh, come on, let's keep it friendly here, please.
|
|