|
Post by xxx on Mar 31, 2004 12:05:13 GMT -5
I wanted to add that I do know that there are Nordicists who do not fear going out on the wild and who are safe without the protection of the pack. And at least I know one such case of a brave Nordicist who has done so. Sadly, she has been impeached by the pack for daring.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 12:38:18 GMT -5
I am sorry, the Nordicists can whine about how swarthy and un-Nordic the Meds look, and that is perfectly fine as Meds adapted themselves to a warm climate. And it is true: until very recently I did not hear about Carleton Coon, but I plan on reading his work soon, after I am done with Baker.
However, I do take offense at Celts who wish to be Germanic and at swarthy modern Germanics who think they are more Nordic than the Slavs whom they stole babies from.
Do us all a favor: if you are a Nordicist, please have lighter eyes than the Meds, be taller (unfortunately for them they generally don't measure up to Mynydd's level), and be as intelligent (the stray Nord taller than Mynydd is likely to be of a mediocre intellect).
I am just glad these Germans got their asses beat by the Slavs just a few decades ago. And all they have is some stray Celts to defend them -- Celts who wish to be Germans!
P.S. If the Slavs are so Ladogan, the Germans (and their Celt stooges) would not be stealing babies from them and wishing to be like them.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 13:31:28 GMT -5
Surely this was intended as a sarcastic jab but actually, you might be surprised at how complimentary a comment like that is—for the true Teuton is not flashy and showy but instead, sure and steady; the methodical Saxon yeoman! Thank you indeed. Except Dalonord is not a "true Teuton." In his own words: He-he, I'm a white American so how can I not be at least part Irish?!
Most of my Irish lineage comes via my maternal grandmother. Her ancestors came from Ireland and settled in Prince Edward Island, Canada in the 1830s. Some are still there but my direct line migrated from there down to Boston by the turn of the century. Some originally came from Ballyheige in the SW and others from County Westmeath in the east of Ireland.
Family names include Conlon, Dalton (although this sounds rather English and usually means dale (valley) + town), O'Brien, Hogan, Roach and a few others that I can't remember now.If there is one thing more despicable than Slavs who asskiss and make alliances with the Nazis (who are generally swarthier than them), it is Celts or part-Celts who pretend to be Germans or exaggerate their Germanic ancestry.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Mar 31, 2004 13:48:48 GMT -5
Do us all a favor: if you are a Nordicist, please have lighter eyes than the Meds, be taller (unfortunately for them they generally don't measure up to Mynydd's level), and be as intelligent (the stray Nord taller than Mynydd is likely to be of a mediocre intellect). Well, thank you for the compliments. I feel a bit uneasy with these things though. Sadly there is something worse. Meds wanting to be accepted as 'peripheric WN'. There are some on SF.
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on Mar 31, 2004 14:01:08 GMT -5
By the way dont forget that Scotland and Ireland are very light eyed. About 80 % of the Scottish and Irish have light eyes (blue/green/grey). Only about 20% have brown eyes. I dont know the number for Wales but I think its about the same.
Compare this for example with Germany. In Germany about 33 % of the people have brown eyes. Very raw estimates ofcourse
You are confusing the terms German and Germanic with eachother. People in Germany are only partly Germanic, Germans have celtic, roman and slavic ancestors too. If you want to see real pure Germanics : go to Scandinavia.
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on Mar 31, 2004 14:05:07 GMT -5
By the way Galvez I agree with you that some slavic countries are blonder than Germany. The Ukraine and Russia for example are both much blonder than Germany. But the Ukraine and Russia cant compete with Scandinavia. Scandinavia is the blondest part of Europe by far.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 14:06:22 GMT -5
You are confusing the terms German and Germanic with eachother. People in Germany are only partly Germanic, Germans have celtic, roman and slavic ancestors too. If you want to see real pure Germanics : go to Scandinavia. I agree: the modern Germans will never measure up to their (alleged!) ancestors.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Mar 31, 2004 14:22:35 GMT -5
By the way dont forget that Scotland and Ireland are very light eyed. About 80 % of the Scottish and Irish have light eyes (blue/green/grey). Only about 20% have brown eyes. I dont know the number for Wales but I think its about the same. 80% of Scots with light eyes? Are you sure? I see that figure much inflated, even for the Irish. Anyway, green eyes means nothing. My mother and my best friend both have green eyes, and they are Meds.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 14:26:24 GMT -5
80% of Scots with light eyes? Are you sure? I see that figure much inflated, even for the Irish. Anyway, green eyes means nothing. My mother and my best friend both have green eyes, and they are Meds. I agree with you. My eyes are green (which means they are lighter than those of many Nordicists), yet I consider them to be dark. Most of my relatives have eyes that completely lack pigmentation or are light-mixed. Green eyes don't make you Nordic.
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on Mar 31, 2004 14:31:33 GMT -5
Yes Irish and Scottish people are very light eyed. Almost as light as Scandinavia.
By the way : the irish and scottish people are uniquely light skinned. Scandinavia is the blondest part of Europe but not the lightest skinned. Ireland is the lightest skinned. irish skin is known for often freckling and almost always getting red in the sun. Scandinavians on the other hand tan more easy.
Have you never heard of this?
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 14:50:44 GMT -5
Yes Irish and Scottish people are very light eyed. Almost as light as Scandinavia. Hmmm... I have had Nordicists tell me I can pass for Irish (Bruenn), and I consider myself to be swarthy. What really disgusts me is that a Montenegrin like AWAR has had the guts to post his pic and looks far more "Nordish" than the neo-Nazis I have posted pics of as a whole -- and yet the neo-Nazis talk about who is pure or impure or who looks Nordic and un-Nordic. Let me also establish a new rule: if you are a Nordicist, not only should you be taller than AWAR and be fairer-skinned, but you must be able to look as though you can beat his ass at boxing. Unfortunately, none would qualify. I guess that's why those "superior" Germans lost WWII. For those scrawny and short (and in many cases swarthy) Nordicists: lift some weights to compensate.
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on Mar 31, 2004 14:57:35 GMT -5
awar doesnt look Northern-European. He looks Central-European to me. He is a borreby I think
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 15:02:57 GMT -5
awar doesnt look Northern-European. He looks Central-European to me. He is a borreby I think He looks more "Nordish" than Revilo Oliver, Joseph Goebbels, Adolph Hitler, and a large number of high-ranking Nazi officials. He also looks more "Nordish" than many so-called German-Americans.
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on Mar 31, 2004 15:12:35 GMT -5
Nordish is a term made up by Nordicist Richard McCullogh.
Why are you using it? It means nothing
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 31, 2004 15:22:08 GMT -5
Nordish is a term made up by Nordicist Richard McCullogh. Why are you using it? It means nothing "Nordish" is a term meant for the brown-eyed, brown-haired modern-day Germans and part-Germans who don't look like the ancient Germanen. It's for wannabe Nordics, as Graeme used to point out. But even using this lowered standard of racial measurement as a frame of reference, all that the modern-day Celto-Germanic supremacists do is ensure that millions of non-Europeans and Southern Europeans can join their movement. It has arbitrary boundaries.
|
|