king
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by king on Jan 16, 2006 14:54:45 GMT -5
East Africans are not hybrids. Anyone who tries to make East Africa hybrid has got to be a fool. I would also like to see Crimsons evidence. Of course he has none so anyone that believes him is just a fool. East Africans are black not a mix.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 15:02:51 GMT -5
The medits are more hybrid than any East African group.
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 16, 2006 15:07:17 GMT -5
How much $$ do need to lay down for King, BJ = Planet Asia latest alias? Inspite of that I still agree with Bass
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 15:09:36 GMT -5
How much $$ do need to lay down for King, BJ = Planet Asia latest alias? Inspite of that I still agree with Bass I'm not BJ, don't even know who BJ is. I swear on the Holy Bible I'm not king nor am I BJ.
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 16, 2006 15:19:57 GMT -5
I just find it odd that these two came out of nowhere and are already engaging in the same petty tit for tat squabbles with your nemesis Crmison.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 15:24:39 GMT -5
I just find it odd that these two came out of nowhere and are already engaging in the same petty tit for tat squabbles with your nemesis Crmison. I whip Crimson Guard singlehandedly everytime, just like I do everyone here, no need to create false identities. King posts on egyptsearch also.
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 17, 2006 0:11:13 GMT -5
Bass the only thing you whip is your own ass,you homo-fetishist dirtbag...you and your silly boyfriends & alternate names.
|
|
|
Post by Yankel on Jan 17, 2006 0:57:57 GMT -5
As annoying as I think you are, Crimson, I think it's hilarious how you constantly heckle Charlie Bass. Nice work.
|
|
|
Post by Soomaal on Jan 17, 2006 1:01:13 GMT -5
Charlie why does everybody on Egyptsearch agree with each other like a bunch of robots?lol
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 17, 2006 1:45:18 GMT -5
Charlie why does everybody on Egyptsearch agree with each other like a bunch of robots?lol Well we all don't agree on everything, I've argued with people on egyptsearch plenty myself and others have argued with each other, just look at some of the older threads.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 17, 2006 1:49:55 GMT -5
Bass the only thing you whip is your own ass,you homo-fetishist dirtbag...you and your silly boyfriends & alternate names. Homo-fetish eh? You have a fetish for thinking I'm other men in your twisted dreams. You mother is dumb, you father is dumb, your brothers are dumb, your sisters are dumb, your aunts and uncles are dumb, now out of all the dumb people in your family how'd you end up being the dumbest one? Was it by chance or fate? When it comes to head to head posting of facts I always wipe the floor with you because you cannot understand what you read and yu spam other people's layman opinions. At least I've emailed the researchers and geneticists myself and got the answers while your sources of understanding are Medophiles Pontikos and racialreality, go figure.
|
|
|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 17, 2006 2:11:58 GMT -5
It depends upon which Ethiopians you're speaking of, if its Cushitic speakers, no, they are not mixed, if its the Semitic speakers such as Amhara yes, but they still black peoples who've absorbed mixture 2,500 years without continuous geneflow from Arabia, so they relative ethnically homogeneous. Despite this, they do not look too different than the neighboring Cushitic speakers who have not received any significant geneflow from Arabia. The Medophiles are Pontikos and racialreality, who improperly misread Wilson et al's study on drug response that Ethiopians aren't black and are 62% Caucasian despite the fact that I publicaly posted my email response from Wilson et al about this matter. . Yes, I meant the Amharas and Tigre/Tigrinya speakers. Why not re-post that e-mail response, Charlie? Agrippa (who is far from being a medophile, whatetever that is) says the reason some scholars speak of "true negroids" is because it´s a super-specialized type, unlike the Caucasoid type. Somalis belong to the so-called Sudanic sub-type. these are normal sudanids, the nuba of sudan - www.leni-riefenstahl.de/images/dienuba/nuba_37.jpgwww.leni-riefenstahl.de/images/dienuba/nuba_1.jpgwww.freiburger-filmforum.de/fifo2001/nuba.htmlnot somali like; sudanids are typically unusually strong and atheletic, with large cheekbones, sudanids tend to have high faces, and have high frequiences of large headedness.
|
|
Heem
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by Heem on Jan 17, 2006 12:44:35 GMT -5
I just find it odd that these two came out of nowhere and are already engaging in the same petty tit for tat squabbles with your nemesis Crmison. I've been lurking this forum since mid last year. I normally just read,but Crimson Guard is so annoying. So I said whatever.
|
|
king
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by king on Jan 17, 2006 15:44:01 GMT -5
I am not Planet Asia I am King. I was on this website months ago. I posted in Coon "predynastic egyptians negro" and was in a debate about the ancient egyptians. I don't really have any problem with Crimson Guard but he does not know when he is wrong. So this annoys me he talks garbage about east africa which makes no sense. He tries to say that East Africa is hybrid when the real Hybrids are the Medit people. I have been called alot of things from Afrocentric to Eurocentric, the truth is I am truthcentric and I only like to talk about the truth no matter what it is.
|
|
|
Post by Sharmaarkee on Jan 17, 2006 17:17:00 GMT -5
I for one believe Somalis are real negroids, but I draw the line at Ethiopians, who are obviously mixed. Who are those "medophiles", Charlie? I´ve never met a self-professed "medophile" or "medocentrist" in my whole life. One problem you suffer from is vision dysfunction. wat is Negroid in sence People Attributed to having 1. Boxing glove nose 2. Black skin texture 3.Kinky hair. so saying somalis are negroid means they have all the attributes mention. which i reject But i would Accept the term true Africans. If ethiopians are to be exempted how come they have more kinky hair? I see no difference Btw Habeshas & Somalis coz most of them were influenced by the Semitic gene flow at varying stages in time as the former is older than the latter. The other excuse normaly used is that of religion. I for 1 believe that Both Christianity & Islam was spread by the habesha in the Horn. meaning The 1st people to embrace Islam were a sizable populationTigre rather than Somalis. Hence you will find muslims in both Amara/Tigre population due to the interreligious fightings the Muslim Amara/Tigre were forced to flee south east as they were massacred by their fellows while large numbers were forced to christianity just like the inquisitors of Spain hence most of the muslim population abhor being refered to Habeshas by other horners who are muslims. so cut the crap of purity coz Also during the time of Menelik II there was heavy mixing between Amara & Oromo. Somalis on the other hand have arisen after heavy mixing btw Oromos,Semites, persians, habeshas, Indians hence comprise of around 80% cushitic 20% foreign. Also the intermixing Varys from region to region. The somali language is more closer to oromo language than any other custhitic language.
|
|