|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:18:04 GMT -5
He doesnt say all he says "several related Mediterranean types" and shows an example of what he is talking about. correct He's calling the people in that area several related Medit types, those men and people are not Medits. "mixed in varying degrees with negroes"
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:20:01 GMT -5
He's calling the people in that area several related Medit types, those men and people are not Medits. "mixed in varying degrees with negroes" Which menas he called them Medits with Negroid mixture. There is nothing Medit about that Somali and east Africa was never flooded or inhabited by Medits.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:21:20 GMT -5
"mixed in varying degrees with negroes" Which menas he called them Medits with Negroid mixture. There is nothing Medit about that Somali and east Africa was never flooded or inhabited by Medits. What do genetics say
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:24:11 GMT -5
"mixed in varying degrees with negroes" Which menas he called them Medits with Negroid mixture. There is nothing Medit about that Somali and east Africa was never flooded or inhabited by Medits. " concentration of several related Mediterranean types"
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:25:57 GMT -5
Which menas he called them Medits with Negroid mixture. There is nothing Medit about that Somali and east Africa was never flooded or inhabited by Medits. What do genetics say Genetics say there was some back migration into east Africa but only in specific groups is it substantial. Anthropologically the modern day people of east Africa are large continuous with the areas Mesolithic and Neolithic inhabitants.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:26:42 GMT -5
Which menas he called them Medits with Negroid mixture. There is nothing Medit about that Somali and east Africa was never flooded or inhabited by Medits. " concentration of several related Mediterranean types" east Africans are *NOT* a related Medit type.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:34:40 GMT -5
Genetics say there was some back migration into east Africa but only in specific groups is it substantial. Anthropologically the modern day people of east Africa are large continuous with the areas Mesolithic and Neolithic inhabitants. What are the specific groups
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:36:20 GMT -5
Genetics say there was some back migration into east Africa but only in specific groups is it substantial. Anthropologically the modern day people of east Africa are large continuous with the areas Mesolithic and Neolithic inhabitants. What are the specific groups Tigray and Amhara. At least you're not dumb like Crimson Guard. Ethiopian Jews are even more African genetically than Amhara and Tigray, but they don't look very different from each other.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:37:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:38:51 GMT -5
LOL, did you even read the full text?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 10:39:56 GMT -5
BRB, gotta drop some logs in the toilet.
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 10:43:41 GMT -5
What are the specific groups Tigray and Amhara. At least you're not dumb like Crimson Guard. Ethiopian Jews are even more African genetically than Amhara and Tigray, but they don't look very different from each other. You are tricky coon showed an example of what he was talking about and he wasnt that far genetically speaking about his expert opinion.Remeber he said some not ALL. and Ethiopian Jews www.ethioguide.com/aa-ethioguide/ethioguide/News_Archive/1299/origin%20of%20falasha_jews122399.htm
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 16, 2006 10:52:13 GMT -5
" concentration of several related Mediterranean types" east Africans are *NOT* a related Medit type. Science,history and logic says otherwise ! "medits"? Your a dumbass! East Africans are a hybrid race, mixed Mediterranean Caucasoid's and Negroid's,their skeletons are not Negroid or completely Negroid due to the archaic blending of races. Their structurally more in the Mediterranean Caucasoid direction. Even genetics show high Caucasoid makeup of the East Africans. How many times does this not filter through that thing you call a brain ? So just be silent already,they are what they are and move on.. away from your silly lamenting ramblings over East Africa & Egypt .
|
|
Heem
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by Heem on Jan 16, 2006 11:12:02 GMT -5
east Africans are *NOT* a related Medit type. Science,history and logic says otherwise ! "medits"? Your a dumbass! East Africans are a hybrid race, mixed Mediterranean Caucasoid's and Negroid's,their skeletons are not Negroid or completely Negroid due to the archaic blending of races. Their structurally more in the Mediterranean Caucasoid direction. Even genetics show high Caucasoid makeup of the East Africans. How many times does this not filter through that thing you call a brain ? So just be silent already,they are what they are and move on.. away from your silly lamenting ramblings over East Africa & Egypt . Stay out of it and shut up for once.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 14:09:30 GMT -5
east Africans are *NOT* a related Medit type. Science,history and logic says otherwise ! Post some proof. "medits"? Your a dumbass! East Africans are a hybrid race, mixed Mediterranean Caucasoid's and Negroid's,their skeletons are not Negroid or completely Negroid due to the archaic blending of races. Their structurally more in the Mediterranean Caucasoid direction.[/quote] Archaic blending? not even Pontikos believes that nonsense, post some evidence wanker. [/quote] Even genetics show high Caucasoid makeup of the East Africans.[/quote] Post evidence. Shut the front door you dumb mother-father and quit running your mouth. Post some evidence.
|
|