|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 9:19:11 GMT -5
Everyone from Greeks to Ethiopians have been included in the so-called ill-defined "Mediterranean race", why don't people abandon this taxon and properly classify people?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 9:25:22 GMT -5
Medophiles must be crazy if they think these two men are members of some ambigous "Medit" race Medophiles are stupid for believing the first guy, a Somali, is the same race as the guy at the bottom but only with black skin, the old dark-white theory has come back to haunt dodona. Let us not forget, that if anyone denies that that Somali man is a Medit, he/she would be labelled an Afrocentric/Black supremacist who's totally out of touch with anthropology, but who's really the one out of touch?
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 15, 2006 11:22:23 GMT -5
Who ever said somalis or etheopians are racially meditarranean???
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Jan 15, 2006 11:52:27 GMT -5
No one. Charlie you are fighting ghosts.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jan 15, 2006 11:55:43 GMT -5
No one. Charlie you are fighting ghosts. Admit it, you nearly wrote "strawmen"! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Soomaal on Jan 15, 2006 11:56:14 GMT -5
Charlie the best thing to do in this case is simply ignore the Hamitic/Mediterranean race just as I ignore elongated/nilotic/atheopid/hybrid labels.
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on Jan 15, 2006 11:59:35 GMT -5
No one. Charlie you are fighting ghosts. Admit it, you nearly wrote "strawmen"! ;D It was tempting . But strawman is a retorichal trick. I think Planet Charlie really believes in the existence of the ghosts he's fighting.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jan 15, 2006 12:07:04 GMT -5
Those ghosts being the evil medophiles and medocentrists/eurocentrists who want to obliterate all evidence of Black Egypt.
|
|
Heem
New Member
Posts: 32
|
Post by Heem on Jan 15, 2006 12:10:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 13:47:52 GMT -5
Those ghosts being the evil medophiles and medocentrists/eurocentrists who want to obliterate all evidence of Black Egypt. Yes Medophiles want to obliterate all evidence of a black presence in Egypt, don't believe it check my debates with Pontikos, he thinks true blacks are restricted limited to one area in Africa.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 13:49:07 GMT -5
Admit it, you nearly wrote "strawmen"! ;D It was tempting . But strawman is a retorichal trick. I think Planet Charlie really believes in the existence of the ghosts he's fighting. Ok Mr strawman, I'm well within reality with every thought that comes forth from my mind. No one is overtly saying these things but covertly yes.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jan 15, 2006 13:53:08 GMT -5
I for one believe Somalis are real negroids, but I draw the line at Ethiopians, who are obviously mixed. Who are those "medophiles", Charlie? I´ve never met a self-professed "medophile" or "medocentrist" in my whole life.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jan 15, 2006 13:56:11 GMT -5
"Medophile" sounds like something dirty, a pervert who belongs in the FBI database. LOL!
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 14:03:12 GMT -5
I for one believe Somalis are real negroids, but I draw the line at Ethiopians, who are obviously mixed. Who are those "medophiles", Charlie? I´ve never met a self-professed "medophile" or "medocentrist" in my whole life. It depends upon which Ethiopians you're speaking of, if its Cushitic speakers, no, they are not mixed, if its the Semitic speakers such as Amhara yes, but they still black peoples who've absorbed mixture 2,500 years without continuous geneflow from Arabia, so they relative ethnically homogeneous. Despite this, they do not look too different than the neighboring Cushitic speakers who have not received any significant geneflow from Arabia. The Medophiles are Pontikos and racialreality, who improperly misread Wilson et al's study on drug response that Ethiopians aren't black and are 62% Caucasian despite the fact that I publicaly posted my email response from Wilson et al about this matter. The thing that ticks me off about Medophiles like those two is that they're good for restricting "Negroids" to one specific discrete phenotype but never speak of a true caucasoid taxon because if they did, they know so-called "Medits" would never fit in it.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jan 15, 2006 14:12:12 GMT -5
I for one believe Somalis are real negroids, but I draw the line at Ethiopians, who are obviously mixed. Who are those "medophiles", Charlie? I´ve never met a self-professed "medophile" or "medocentrist" in my whole life. It depends upon which Ethiopians you're speaking of, if its Cushitic speakers, no, they are not mixed, if its the Semitic speakers such as Amhara yes, but they still black peoples who've absorbed mixture 2,500 years without continuous geneflow from Arabia, so they relative ethnically homogeneous. Despite this, they do not look too different than the neighboring Cushitic speakers who have not received any significant geneflow from Arabia. The Medophiles are Pontikos and racialreality, who improperly misread Wilson et al's study on drug response that Ethiopians aren't black and are 62% Caucasian despite the fact that I publicaly posted my email response from Wilson et al about this matter. . Yes, I meant the Amharas and Tigre/Tigrinya speakers. Why not re-post that e-mail response, Charlie? Agrippa (who is far from being a medophile, whatetever that is) says the reason some scholars speak of "true negroids" is because it´s a super-specialized type, unlike the Caucasoid type. Somalis belong to the so-called Sudanic sub-type.
|
|