|
Post by murphee on Nov 26, 2005 16:02:42 GMT -5
It is! I was never really a big fan of watermelon until a friend, a German-American (Nordic/Falish LOL) was always buying watermelon and raving about how good it is. Spending lots of time in the summer with him, we eat a lot of watermelon. Very messy, best to eat it outdoors. A few months ago, we were camping, and he threw a watermelon rind away near his tent, and then wondered why large raccoons were hanging about all night
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Nov 26, 2005 16:44:38 GMT -5
Yeah nrdthl White Nationalists weren't blessed with basic common sense.These Nazis always complain about how "Niggers" whine and blame everything bad that happens in their lives on the WASPS but they are acting like the same "Niggers" that they despise when all they do is whine and blame everything bad that happens in their lives on the Jews so they themselves are no different.If one of them slips on a banana peel and falls they will find a way to blame it on the Jooze. Could you mention what accusations you're speaking of, so I can know what "blind hate" and irrationality you're referring too?
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Nov 26, 2005 16:49:26 GMT -5
I will give you an example everytime a Black or other NonWhite commits a violent crime against an Anglo the posters on Stormfront and Vanguard always find a way to blame it on the Jews hell even when Katrina happened and they heard stories of Black men raping White women they pointed their finger to the Jews and blamed them for the Black thugs raping White women in New Orleans. ::)They blame Jews more than they blame the actual perpertrators who commited the rapes.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Nov 26, 2005 16:53:09 GMT -5
Doesn't David Duke actually have a doctorate in history? He's not your run-of-the-mill illiterate "white supremacist". I read an article by him once and he seemed surprisingly balanced. I know he's persona non grata, and we're all supposed to be prejudiced against him without actually hearing him out. But I actually found his call for equality sane. He doesn't want other races dead (from what I gathered); he just wants them all held to the same standard. Look at this quote from President Jimmy Carter's autobiography, where he repeats the words of Israel's Prime Minister Menachem Begin: "Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." Why does the media not blacklist people like Menachem Begin? --Therein lies the despicable double-standard. Jews, blacks and Mexicans get to spew racist filth like this, and no one says a thing. Pan-Europeanists make far, FAR less disgusting remarks and are blacklisted for life, their careers destroyed, their characters meticulously assassinated. (I'm not saying that they shouldn't be. I'm just saying that, if we beat up on them, we better damn-well hold the Jews, blacks, Muslims and Third Worlders to the same standard. Hate is hate. "Anti-Semitism is nothing but the antagonistic attitude produced in the non-Jew by the Jewish group. The Jewish group has thrived on oppression and on the antagonism it has forever met in the world." -- Albert Einstein, in Collier's Magazine, November 26, 1938 You're wrong. Perhaps you think hate should be hate, however, in the real world it's not, and this is an obvious fact.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Nov 26, 2005 17:01:39 GMT -5
I will give you an example everytime a Black or other NonWhite commits a violent crime against an Anglo the posters on Stormfront and Vanguard always find a way to blame it on the Jews hell even when Katrina happened and they heard stories of Black men raping White women they pointed their finger to the Jews and blamed them for the Black thugs raping White women in New Orleans. ::)They blame Jews more than they blame the actual perpertrators who commited the rapes. You used the terms "white-nationalists" and "Nazi". Then generalized the group by some posts you had read on some forum, in a disdainful tone, for the reason that they themselves generalize in much the same way. Seeing as the Thread is about David Duke, who you implied belongs to an non-sensible paranoid hate mongering group, you could give some specific example to Duke's own irrational beliefs.
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Nov 26, 2005 17:05:17 GMT -5
A relative of my brother's wife was an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp--she looked a lot like me--and a Nazi guard told her 'you don't look like a Jew,' he watched after her and she survived the war. If you're an American the overwhelming likelihood is that your sisters relative is a liar. Read the "holocaust industry" by Norman Fikelstein that entails absurd statistics of these self-made "survivors". It's not too hard to pick up on though, recently I saw an American news site with an article on a survivor whom claimed to have survived in the Auschwitz concentration camp for 6 grueling years, obviously unaware that the camp opened in 1941. In the same article the Survivor by the name of "Harry Grossman", detailed cruelties by Germans such as grabbing babies feet and smashing it head against the side of the train cars thus killing the child, along with other unspeakable barbarities the Germans had perpetrated. If That isn't hate promotion, I don't know what is. It's not limited to Germans though, Balts, Ukrainians and Poles are also the targets of hatefull slander. Like Jerzy Kosinski with regard to the devil Poles.
|
|
|
Post by Mike the Jedi on Nov 26, 2005 17:10:49 GMT -5
David Duke is a white separatist, not supremacist.
|
|
|
Post by zathuras on Nov 26, 2005 17:14:34 GMT -5
David Duke is a white separatist, not supremacist. thats how he labels himself now, but was he not leader of the KKK at one point?
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Nov 26, 2005 17:18:20 GMT -5
Yeah David Duke was part of the KKK the group that not only hates Jews but also hates Italians and Catholics.KKK hates all Caucasoids who are not Anglo Saxon Protestants,you heard what they did to the Italians/Sicilians in Louisiana back in the days because they were too Catholic and too swarthy for the Klan.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Nov 26, 2005 17:22:24 GMT -5
American White Supremacist David Duke Addressing Damacus Demonstration in Support of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad: "My Country Is Also Occupied by the Zionists" LOL! At least you´ve got to admit he´s got a sense of humour. ;D His statement only makes sense as a hyperbole.
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Nov 26, 2005 17:23:13 GMT -5
DukeofPain, You make some really sane comments. If someone repeated despicable nonsense like the 19th Century claim that Jews drink Christian babies' blood, then we're all trained to look at him with contempt; but if a Jew turns around and say that Germans/Poles/Russians, etc. drank Jewish babies' blood, we're all supposed to accept uncritically, or else we're "antisemitic". We're not supposed to question, or hold both sides to equal standards. The "Straight Dope" website--which is nationally syndicated and no one's idea of a fringe site--did an article on the urban legends about Germans making lampshades out of Jews' skins or soap from Jewish fat. The author admitted that he assumed that these claims were true, but then he did the research and found out they were bogus, and in fact survive from WWI propaganda (before the Nazis ever came to power). The first "victims" of the propaganda were Belgians. The British Ministry of Propaganda put out fake stories to stir up hatred and to help the war-effort. In the fables, Germans used Belgian babies for bayonet practice, used raping-machines on Belgian maidens and made lampshades and soap out of their fat. Yet, to this day, you hear people parrot these moronic recycled WWI urban legends (switching them to WWII and changing the Belgians to Jews), and they expect grown adults to accept them if they're unassailable historical fact. Truly sad.
It's almost even politically inadvisable to teach people about the history of war propaganda, lest they start accusing you of "Holocaust denial," etc. (Too many people want to blur the lines between what really happened and what didn't--as if WWII wasn't bad enough, on its own merits.)
"When the State is wrong it is dangerous to be right." --Votaire
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Nov 26, 2005 17:40:29 GMT -5
A relative of my brother's wife was an inmate in a Nazi concentration camp--she looked a lot like me--and a Nazi guard told her 'you don't look like a Jew,' he watched after her and she survived the war. If you're an American the overwhelming likelihood is that your sisters relative is a liar. Heh, I would love you to explain this one. You ask Tony for proof for his accusation regarding David Duke's views but you're quick to call someone you do not know a liar based on a book written by an author that doesn't speak of that woman's experiences directly. Perhap's there's a chapter called "Murphee's sister - in - law's relative lies about her experience" that I'm not aware of. You then point out to a man who had gone through the Holocaust and lied about it. Does this some how prove she lied?
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Nov 26, 2005 17:53:54 GMT -5
If you're an American the overwhelming likelihood is that your sisters relative is a liar. Heh, I would love you to explain this one. You ask Tony for proof for his accusation regarding David Duke's views but you're quick to call someone you do not know a liar based on a book written by an author that doesn't speak of that woman's experiences directly. Perhap's there's a chapter called "Murphee's sister - in - law's relative lies about her experience" that I'm not aware of. You then point out to a man who had gone through the Holocaust and lied about it. Does this some how prove she lied? I didn't call anybody a liar, you just can't read. "overwhelming likelihood" And yes, according to Finkelsteins figures given in the book, the overwhelming majority of american "survivors", are liars.
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Nov 26, 2005 18:38:59 GMT -5
Heh, claiming that the "overwhelming likelihood" that she's a liar without evidence is just as bad as saying she is a liar considering you have no proof of any kind to make such a statement.
If i said there is an "overwhelming likelihood" that you're are a thief you wouldn't be too thrilled considering I have nothing to base this on. I'd have to have some evidence to make that assumption.
You made the claim that the statement this woman made is untrustworthy (oddly, enough because Murphee is an American.. i sense a deep hatred towards Americans, you American hater, you) and then referred to a book on the Holocaust denying most figures as back up for your claim. Which, by the way, has nothing to do with this woman, or her experiences. That some lied isn't evidence that she lied.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Nov 26, 2005 18:55:29 GMT -5
How many anti-Jews are there on Dodona anyways.
|
|