|
|
Post by gee on Jun 25, 2005 11:30:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 25, 2005 11:33:57 GMT -5
A couple of those women look mixed, especially the first, third, and fourth ones.
|
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jun 25, 2005 11:42:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 25, 2005 11:48:37 GMT -5
Yes, it's fairly obvious just by looking at them. They are also all quite beautiful.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ponto Hardbottle on Jul 7, 2005 11:55:40 GMT -5
i15.photobucket.com/albums/a394/gundagai/07-07-2005090449PM.jpg]That is from a book written by Gordon T Bowles, The people of Asia, Willner Brothers Limited, Birkenhead, 1977. I don't quote from the book as it is old and until recently I did not know who Mr. Bowles was. Now I know he was a respected and renown anthropologist. The numbers represent ethnic groups.
|
|
|
|
Post by greatness on Jul 18, 2005 13:20:30 GMT -5
interesting
|
|
trajan
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by trajan on Jul 25, 2005 23:13:55 GMT -5
i15.photobucket.com/albums/a394/gundagai/07-07-2005090449PM.jpg]That is from a book written by Gordon T Bowles, The people of Asia, Willner Brothers Limited, Birkenhead, 1977. I don't quote from the book as it is old and until recently I did not know who Mr. Bowles was. Now I know he was a respected and renown anthropologist. The numbers represent ethnic groups. It's quite strange that Northern Chinese and Japanese are lumped in the same group. They do differ quite significantly from an anthropometric point of view, don't they ? I remember that Baker in his book "Races" wrote that the base of the japanese population was the paleomongolid race and the sinid race was a minority element in Japan even though predominant in Japanese sport teams. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike the Jedi on Jul 25, 2005 23:37:27 GMT -5
Do the Japanese represent what southeast Asians would look like without Australoid mixture, I wonder?
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jul 26, 2005 0:18:58 GMT -5
Those are some fine looking specimens..
|
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jul 26, 2005 12:08:31 GMT -5
Do the Japanese represent what southeast Asians would look like without Australoid mixture, I wonder? Only certain variants, but they are majority variants in some regions. Furthermore they have the Ainuid admixture, especially in the North and Sinid-Tungid admixture all over the country. |
|
trajan
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by trajan on Aug 11, 2005 23:47:49 GMT -5
Are there any leptomorphic mongoloid types ? Are unmixed Sinids leptomorphic ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Aug 14, 2005 17:06:57 GMT -5
Nordsinids, the Japanese-Korean Jakunin type (largely Nordsinid either) are both very leptomorphic. Rather leptomorphic-mesomorphic are certain Mittelsinid variants (especially Tibetid) and certain Suedsinid variants. Under Palaemongolids there are different variants, with certain groups being rather leptomorpic as well.
The difference is, that all this variants are more feminin, and especially if going further south, more paedomorphic infantile.
So really leptomorphic are mostly the Nordsinids and the Jakunin type which is especially common in Japanese upper class, certain areas of Japan-Korea and the near areas of China (the Jakunin type shows weaker Mongolid features and signs of admixture than the usual Nordsinids (Manchus f.e.).
|
|
|
|
Post by tictactoe on Aug 15, 2005 10:29:20 GMT -5
I think these people are Uralic.  these aren't Uralics. Its a Tofalar family from Irkusk. As far as I remember the Tofalar speak a Uyghur related Turkic language. |
|
trajan
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by trajan on Aug 19, 2005 0:09:34 GMT -5
The racial base of Cambodia is East Weddid, similar to the element you find in Indian tribal groups and certain Bangladeshis, even in Calcutta you have a great presence of this type. East Weddids are just somewhat more paedomorphic and somewhat lighter pigmented than some Weddis groups in India and of course, usually mixed with Palaemongolids. Indonesians have various admixture from Weddid, Melanesid and Negritids (Australasian - Australomelanesian in the widest sense), but from Sinids (Chinese) and even Europids (Arabians, especially in Malaysia and parts of Indonesia) too. The base is a gracile Palaemongolid variant, which is even in the more pure form darker and somewhat altered (Weddid). Agrippa, could you please elaborate a little bit more on these East Weddids, f.e. where is the frontier between East Weddids and other Weddids. In India ? And if yes, where in India ? |
|
|
|
Post by gee on Sept 14, 2005 21:52:52 GMT -5
I think these people are Uralic. these aren't Uralics. Its a Tofalar family from Irkusk. As far as I remember the Tofalar speak a Uyghur related Turkic language. So what? You think we are speaking about languages here? |
|
