|
Post by Lycansupreme on Jun 17, 2005 11:01:39 GMT -5
Well, it certainly would be alot better than the piss-poor research (if you can even call it that) that currently exists, especially for south east asia. And to think that taxpayer money is being funnelled into these blatanly misleading studies by these so-called "scientists" at some of these universities just blows my mind. You have to realize that these "studies" are centuries old. The modern stuff, primary literature/studies, published in journals, are basically accurate. It just gives the impression that studies are inaccurate because people on here prefer stuff from long ago. Hopefully you are right. Hell, it seems the stuff I read on Asian-American websites seems far more accurate regarding East/SE Asian phenotypes than anything I read here or on most other general race-based sites lol.
|
|
|
Post by Lycansupreme on Jun 17, 2005 11:13:19 GMT -5
Hopefully you are right. Hell, it seems the stuff I read on Asian-American websites seems far more accurate regarding East/SE Asian phenotypes than anything I read here or on most other general race-based sites lol. Are you Asian? Vietnamese, which, according to most anthropological maps are the same skin color as Cambodians LoL.
|
|
yma
New Member
Posts: 35
|
Post by yma on Jun 17, 2005 12:51:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Jun 17, 2005 13:01:34 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by guntank on Jun 17, 2005 13:50:16 GMT -5
yeah I agree with human2, I think it's pretty stupid to divide asians into so many -nids. I've lived in Taiwan for like twenty years and all I can distinguish is Han Chinese and native taiwanese tribes, with a lot of variation in between and it's not really clear-cut.
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 17, 2005 14:37:27 GMT -5
Like I said, sorry about the pictures in advance. I was in a hurry to illustrate and just googled whatever came to mind and I naturally screwed up a couple of times.  Perhaps this would be a better example of the "Mongolo-Uralic" type:  Here's the link you requested, Lycan, but it won't do you much good unless you can read the Cyrillic alphabet: www.humanities.edu.ru/db/glossary/1
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jun 17, 2005 16:09:25 GMT -5
^Isn't she just pure Mongoloid? I don' see " more often concave nose, rather light pigmentation of hair and eyes for a partially Mongoloid group, soft wavy hair."
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 17, 2005 16:17:04 GMT -5
If this were any other thread, I would say so because she is so extreme. But I'm not sure if there is any such thing as pure Mongoloids in Uralic populations. Uralians are confusing. Some look like Baltics, some look like Siberids, some look intermediate between Baltics and Siberids, others look like their own transient thing altogether and cannot be so easily classified.  I think Zemelmete's mom is a good example of what Bunak meant by Mongolo-Uralic, while Zemelmete herself looks more Euro-Uralic because of her father. 
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jun 17, 2005 18:32:34 GMT -5
If this were any other thread, I would say so because she is so extreme. But I'm not sure if there is any such thing as pure Mongoloids in Uralic populations. Uralians are confusing. Some look like Baltics, some look like Siberids, some look intermediate between Baltics and Siberids, others look like their own transient thing altogether and cannot be so easily classified.  I think Zemelmete's mom is a good example of what Bunak meant by Mongolo-Uralic, while Zemelmete herself looks more Euro-Uralic because of her father.  ok, who is Uralic then can you show any picture? I think these people are Uralic.   These girls are Euro- Uralic.   This man is Mongol Uralic.     This man is Mongol -Central Asian type. 
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jun 17, 2005 18:40:30 GMT -5
what are the differences between northern mongoloids? northern chinese, japanese, koreans, mongolians.. who is generally taller? who is hairier? for example
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member

Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Jun 17, 2005 18:49:39 GMT -5
what are the differences between northern mongoloids? northern chinese, japanese, koreans, mongolians.. who is generally taller? who is hairier? for example The AInu are the hairest by far. They may be the hairest people on the planet. N Chinese are the tallest. Men from north central and north western China are about 5'11" 180 cm. Most Northern Chinese are between 5'7"-5'8" (171 cm) but young men from Beijing are as tall as American men. They might even surpase them by a couple of inches in another generation or two. Young Taiwanese men 20-25 are alos as tall as American men (176 cm) (and they are southern Chinese).
|
|
|
Post by zemelmete on Jun 18, 2005 11:49:21 GMT -5
I do not put myself in any mongoloid type because I am at least 60% - 70% european. It means that I pass more in some caucasoid racial type than mongoloid racial type. I never have heard about mongolo-uralic, this racial group is something really strange. If to speak about my physical appearance, I have high, not low face, straight, not wavy hair and dark, not light pigmentation of eyes and hair. Yes, in pictures I have light hair, but they are coloured. This nenets woman is arctic mongoloid, not "mongolo-uralic". There are pure mongoloids between uralic populations, if to speak about samoyedic speaking nations (nenets, nganasans etc.). If to speak about finno-ugric speaking Western Siberians like khanty, mansi, pure mongoloids among them don't exist. My mother is mongolo-uralic?  As far as I know my mother is pure khanty after nationality. Racially I guess she is arctic mongoloid with northern european admixture. I'm very sure about european admixture in her because she in childhood was completely blonde. And also she hasn't epicantic folds. She has that type of eyes what aren't neither caucasian or mongoloid, but which I can call "uralic".
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 18, 2005 17:18:26 GMT -5
Exactly, you've got it. All Bunak meant by Mongolo-Uralic is a Ladogan that leans toward the Mongoloid Siberid side (as in the case of West Siberians), and by Euro-Uralic, a Ladogan that leans toward the European Baltid side (as in the case of some northern Russians). That's basically what Coon's Ladogan is all about, albeit the ones he talks about are the more European ones that live in Russia and who don't look as Mongoloid as West Siberians. I guess he didn't want to use the word Uralic because it's confusing.  West Siberid (fully Mongoloid): Samoyeds, Kets, etc. Ladogan (partially Mongoloid West Siberians and Eastern Europeans): Khanties, Mansis, some northern Russians, etc. Well, now that's out of the way, any other criticisms or questions about Bunak's types?
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Jun 18, 2005 23:20:33 GMT -5
Yeah, some of the terms I kind of had to improvise on because the terminology would be slightly confusing otherwise. For instance, Bunak refers to the Sinid as the "Far Eastern" race, but most of the Mongoloid types fit that vague geographic description. I knew what he meant but it's better to avoid that kind of ambiguous terminology if at all possible. I also included alternate names that I've heard thrown around in the past for flavor. And the Austrasian and Austronesian subheadings are of my own design just for organizational purposes. If you wanted to view the original material, you'd have to work with the Cyrillic alphabet. ARCTIC MONGOLOIDS1.) Eskimoid (Arctic North America) 2.) East Siberid (Chukotka-Kamchatka) 3.) West Siberid (Western Siberia) TUNGIDS1.) Amur-Sakhalinid (Amur River lands and Sahkalin Island) 2.) Taigid (Tungus-speaking Siberia and Yakutia) 3.) Kumid (Mongolia) SINIDS1.) Nordsinid (Northern China and Korea) 2.) Mittelsinid (Tibet and Central China) PALEOMONGOLOIDS1.) Austrasian (Burma and Indochina) 2.) Austronesian (Malaysia, Indonesia, and Taiwan) AMERINDS1.) Pacifid (Pacific Northwest and Rio Grande enclaves) 2.) Silvid (Great Plains and Appalachees) 3.) Margid (California and Sonora) 4.) Centralid (Central America and Colombia) 5.) Brasilid (Brazilian jungle and the Caribbean) 6.) Andid (the Andes) 7.) Pampid (Patagonia) 8.) Lagid (Southeastern Brazil and Tierra del Fuego) COMPOSITES AND HYBRIDS1.) Uralic (the Uralian periphery and Lappland) 2.) Turanid (northern Turkestan) 3.) Nesid (East Indies, Oceania) 4.) Ainuid (Hokkaido and Sakhalin) 5.) Cipangid (Japan) I think it looks a lot more impressive and readable in a condensed, simplistic form like this. The long drawn-out version obviously turns people off, even if Bunak is doing nothing but describing people. Interestingly, he doesn't include a south Chinese type (Sudsinid). It's my bet that he thought the Sudsinids were more properly Southern Mongoloids, relatively unmixed with Australoids when compared to Indochina.
|
|
josex
Full Member
 
Posts: 141
|
Post by josex on Jun 19, 2005 12:56:36 GMT -5
???What about Tainos?
|
|