|
Post by Ptolemy on Jun 25, 2004 13:13:57 GMT -5
You know that you are only fuelling the Nordicist's claims about Southern Europeans particularly Portuguese and Greeks. Negroes have high testosterone, and Portuguese have high testosterone. Therefore Portuguese are negroes. That is how those deluded fools think. I don't give a rats a$$ what Nordics think of Romanics/Latins. That line of thought doesn't change their women's opinion about us, as all Med men know. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Vitor on Jun 25, 2004 16:51:41 GMT -5
You know that you are only fuelling the Nordicist's claims about Southern Europeans particularly Portuguese and Greeks. Negroes have high testosterone, and Portuguese have high testosterone. Therefore Portuguese are negroes. That is how those deluded fools think. If we follow that line of thought Then the true non negroe race people are Asians....
|
|
|
Post by captainusa1 on Jun 25, 2004 21:52:01 GMT -5
I believe that may be a combination of their naturally large, robust bone structures with 'pumped up' muscles. Maybe they just drank a lot of milk. It does the body good.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Jun 26, 2004 11:13:12 GMT -5
You know that you are only fuelling the Nordicist's claims about Southern Europeans particularly Portuguese and Greeks. Negroes have high testosterone, and Portuguese have high testosterone. Therefore Portuguese are negroes. That is how those deluded fools think. Actually, when Nordicists compare Meds to Negroes it is not as bad as one might think: many are insecure about the alleged "potency" of Black males and see it in Southern European males as well. Who's to say that a comparison with Blacks is necessarily bad? Only those who have been brainwashed by ideologues with an inferiority complex or accept their premises will feel this way. People who feel threatened often go on the attack, and it so happens that many White racists feel threatened by Black guys. The educated members of society, regardless of subrace, dismiss outright the claims that Southern Europeans are in any way "Negroid." Ptolemy is correct: regardless of how Nordicists feel, their women will feel otherwise about many of their concerns.
|
|
|
Post by Ptolemy on Jun 26, 2004 12:20:08 GMT -5
Ptolemy is correct: regardless of how Nordicists feel, their women will feel otherwise about many of their concerns. Believe me, we don't fee threatened by northern Euros. What is there to be threatened about?? "somewhat typical" British males from the group Scritti Politti ^^ "somewhat typical" British males from the group Scritti Politti ^^
|
|
|
Post by Graeme on Jun 26, 2004 12:42:37 GMT -5
Don't get my wrong. I don't care what the deluded ones think. I was only thinking that I would expect some threads more in the line of Sicilians are Mulattoes. I hate those threads.
I have the build of a rugby player, have body hair, heavy bone structure and very muscled. I only have to look at a weight and my muscles expand! So I have my fair share of the natural male human anabolic steroid: testosterone. I am Maltese.
|
|
Sandwich
Full Member
La pens?e d'un homme est avant tout sa nostalgie
Posts: 208
|
Post by Sandwich on Jun 26, 2004 17:52:44 GMT -5
Ptolemey, don't you think it's posture and grooming you're illustrating rather than anything else. And a rather specialised taste for Italian nomenclature, not a typical English feature at all A more typical Brit would be this chap. Just as arbitrary. Also, is homosexuality associated with low testosterone? (I assume that was your point, because those guys look ...well ..). Have there been any studies on this. Are all orientals gay? No, shouldn't think so. Not really a helpful selection factor in a whole people, that.
|
|
|
Post by Ptolemy on Jun 26, 2004 21:48:28 GMT -5
Ptolemey, don't you think it's posture and grooming you're illustrating rather than anything else. And a rather specialised taste for Italian nomenclature, not a typical English feature at all A more typical Brit would be this chap. Just as arbitrary. Also, is homosexuality associated with low testosterone? (I assume that was your point, because those guys look ...well ..). Have there been any studies on this. Are all orientals gay? No, shouldn't think so. Not really a helpful selection factor in a whole people, that. ^^Looks like a Brit of Atlanto-Med descent. The original inhabitants of th British Isles
|
|
Sandwich
Full Member
La pens?e d'un homme est avant tout sa nostalgie
Posts: 208
|
Post by Sandwich on Jun 27, 2004 7:58:53 GMT -5
Of course, the English, with the earliest industrial revolution, and the enclosure movement, and hence the earliest displacement of the mass of the population off the land and into the cities, where often anarchy reigned, marriage was not always the rule among the poor, alcoholism and prostitution were rampant, have been careful to preserve these bloodlines. He plays for England, you know. Not Wales. With that background, the fact that his physical appearance fits some - but doubtless not all - the characteristics of craniometrically determined types is not that relevant. He's an Englishman, not a med or a nord. England and France are just not racially homogenous. You get hints of the past in certain areas - (preponderance of round headed people in rural Kent, for instance), but in the cities ...
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Jun 27, 2004 13:55:00 GMT -5
There are also studies that claim that white men from the southern USA have higher testosterone levels than white men from the northern USA. BTW, why do men from Scandinavian countries dominate those "World's Strongest Man" contests? While being a Med through and through, I am 1.91m/6'3" tall and have a strong and robust build. I am also quite fit and used to be much fit. I've practiced a few sports from Martial Arts to Rugby, or mountain climbing and sailing, and some weight lifting always in between. Yet I would have never gone into strength contests to try to prove that I can be as well endowed as a mule or an ox because I fail to see the point to compare myself with such beasts (mules or ox). I wouldn't have mind to go into chess tournaments though. Those kind of pissing contests for animals have place in the Scandinavian countries and few other members from other nations bother with going to them. If they prove something is how retrogressive they are. Compare them to Græco-Roman fight, Karate or Judo where technique counts much. Many years ago those Scandinavian contests would have made much sense as trade fairs where to hire those fine Nordic specimens to replace a dead mule or an ox as agricultural labour. But in modern days, with the availability of tractors and other machinery in agriculture, these Nordic specimens have become useless as their maintainance and reparations are much more expensive than tractors.
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jun 27, 2004 18:05:45 GMT -5
Those kind of pissing contests for animals have place in the Scandinavian countries and few other members from other nations bother with going to them. .... Many years ago those Scandinavian contests would have made much sense as trade fairs where to hire those fine Nordic specimens to replace a dead mule or an ox as agricultural labour. But in modern days, with the availability of tractors and other machinery in agriculture, these Nordic specimens have become useless as their maintainance and reparations are much more expensive than tractors. But the lifting contests that take place in the “World’s strongest man” completions are very similar to the less sophisticated rural Basque competition of stone-lifting.
|
|
|
Post by captainusa1 on Jun 27, 2004 18:19:25 GMT -5
While being a Med through and through, I am 1.91m/6'3" tall and have a strong and robust build. I am also quite fit and used to be much fit. I've practiced a few sports from Martial Arts to Rugby, or mountain climbing and sailing, and some weight lifting always in between. Yet I would have never gone into strength contests to try to prove that I can be as well endowed as a mule or an ox because I fail to see the point to compare myself with such beasts (mules or ox). I wouldn't have mind to go into chess tournaments though. Those kind of pissing contests for animals have place in the Scandinavian countries and few other members from other nations bother with going to them. If they prove something is how retrogressive they are. Compare them to Græco-Roman fight, Karate or Judo where technique counts much. Many years ago those Scandinavian contests would have made much sense as trade fairs where to hire those fine Nordic specimens to replace a dead mule or an ox as agricultural labour. But in modern days, with the availability of tractors and other machinery in agriculture, these Nordic specimens have become useless as their maintainance and reparations are much more expensive than tractors. Maybe they just tend to be bigger and stronger. They were seen that way in ancient times. It was said that one Celtic woman could fight five Roman soldiers at the same time, and *this* was written by a Roman. It could be that the ancient "Nords" were just physically, not mentally, superior.
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jun 27, 2004 19:17:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Jun 27, 2004 21:49:39 GMT -5
Maybe they just tend to be bigger and stronger. They were seen that way in ancient times. It was said that one Celtic woman could fight five Roman soldiers at the same time, and *this* was written by a Roman. It could be that the ancient "Nords" were just physically, not mentally, superior. Oh, yes, that's from the book "Celtic women vs. 5 Roman men" by Plinius McAugustus
|
|
|
Post by Vitor on Jun 27, 2004 22:00:32 GMT -5
I found the basque country as my ancient origin. I have Rh negative, a type of blood that is very common in there, and diluted from there. So that gene might come from there...or... that was the place were the "ancient" europeans remained free from new blood.
|
|