|
|
Post by galvez on Jan 15, 2004 18:34:58 GMT -5
What is the average IQ of White Nationalists? Personally, I think they're dumb. All the way to the bottom.  |
|
|
|
Post by Artemidoros on Jan 15, 2004 18:49:57 GMT -5
Most are complete idiots I agree. A look at Stormfront will convince anyone. There are some people with intact neuron connections amongst them but they are sociopaths.
|
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Jan 17, 2004 11:58:05 GMT -5
Most are complete idiots I agree. A look at Stormfront will convince anyone. There are some people with intact neuron connections amongst them but they are sociopaths. White Nationalism attracts people who have accomplished nothing in their personal lives -- making up fictitious personalities online with dreams and aspirations that will never be fulfilled -- because it allows such individuals to feel successful through a (collective) racial identity. To say they have retarded IQs is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is truth to it: intelligent people tend to shun White Nationalism not just because they are told to but because they know that the movement -- from top to bottom -- is full of losers and degenerates. White Nationalists pride themselves on the accomplishments of "Whites" -- nevermind their own failures -- but they happen to be, generally speaking, among the worst elements of their own supposed race. The group identity masks their personal shortcomings. They are absolutely nothing without their political identity. |
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Jan 17, 2004 19:28:55 GMT -5
White Nationalism attracts people who have accomplished nothing in their personal lives -- making up fictitious personalities online with dreams and aspirations that will never be fulfilled -- because it allows such individuals to feel successful through a (collective) racial identity. a much more inteligent atitude is to sit back and watch TV all day long and let the sub-indian types and the blacks invade your neighborhood and date your sister. isn't multiculturalism great?  To say they have retarded IQs is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is truth to it: intelligent people tend to shun White Nationalism not just because they are told to but because they know that the movement -- from top to bottom -- is full of losers and degenerates. in every society, group, or movement, you will find quality people and people who aren't so bright but still support the cause. Don't limit yourself to the posts of the WNs who aren't that bright, i recomend posts by users such as Charles A Lindbergh, JohnJoyTree, Joseph Morgan, electrik, Svyatoslav_Igorevich, etc... White Nationalists pride themselves on the accomplishments of "Whites" of course WNs pride themselves with accomplishments of whites, if they prided themselves with accomplishments of blacks then the movement would be called Black Nationalism instead of White Nationalism ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jan 17, 2004 20:50:15 GMT -5
If your sister had an adequate education not even living in the Blackest neighborhood would make her date a Black man.
A more traditional nationalism than a "racial Nationalism" would be more effective in preventing non-white immigrants from getting into traditional white lands such as Europe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Jan 17, 2004 22:17:09 GMT -5
If your sister had an adequate education not even living in the Blackest neighborhood would make her date a Black man. a White education you mean A more traditional nationalism than a "racial Nationalism" would be more effective in preventing non-white immigrants from getting into traditional white lands such as Europe. traditional nationalism only helps whites from Europe, and its also limited to one country, a French Nationalist fights for France, a English Nationalist fights for England, but a White Nationalist fights for his race globaly no matter where he is living. Depending in where you are from Nationalism and WN are very oposite things, for example im Brazilian, Brazilian Nationalism is very anti-white because it promotes racial integrity and race-mixing, therefore one who is a Brazilian Nationalist cannot be a true White Nationalist. |
|
Marina
Full Member
Just call me French-Hammerette!
Posts: 245
|
Post by Marina on Jan 18, 2004 0:52:39 GMT -5
If your sister had an adequate education not even living in the Blackest neighborhood would make her date a Black man. A more traditional nationalism than a "racial Nationalism" would be more effective in preventing non-white immigrants from getting into traditional white lands such as Europe. About your comment on nationalism- I agree, but I don't think it will work for America. Oh, well, I've already figured the country was doomed- which is why I'm heading out before it officially becomes a "developing nation." |
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jan 18, 2004 9:26:33 GMT -5
a White education you mean Call it whatever color you like. Dating is one thing but marring is another. You can very well play around with attractive Mestizas but marring one is something else for the simple fact the society in which you live would stigmatize your children as different. Why should a white from Russia, Bolivia or Sweden care about what happens to France? That’s the failure of a mega style of Nationalism. That’s why pan- stile movements such as Pan-Slavism, Nordicism, “Mediterranism”, Pan-Americanism (remember Bolívar?) etc would not work in the long term. In the case of the Americas, White people created our countries, but I don’t see any contradiction in being a Nationalist in a mixed race Nation and being White. I prefer a patriotic Negro or Mestizo to a coward White who in case of war would run away to the US or Europe, like many would do. That doesn’t mean you’ll mix with the Negro’s or Mestizo’s sister though. In Mexico it’s the same. Racial Mixing is portrayed at School as the basis of the national Identity. Even then I though when the teachers said that I wasn’t Mestizo and neither were most of my schoolmates. Although I believe cultural mixing and not racial is the basis of my country, but once again that doesn’t imply you’ll mix. Do you believe most “Whites” in Latin America would be willing to live in an all white state or getting rid of Mestizos, Blacks etc? I don’t think the whites would be willing to occupy the jobs that the most of mixed people have right now, which they’d have to in case of getting rid of them. Just imagine an all white society in which Whites would pick up the garbage, wash your car etc. |
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Jan 18, 2004 11:35:02 GMT -5
Call it whatever color you like. Dating is one thing but marring is another. You can very well play around with attractive Mestizas but marring one is something else for the simple fact the society in which you live would stigmatize your children as different. dating leads to relationships and eventually marriage, using a mestiza as a sexual object and later dumping her saying "sorry im a racialist, i was only looking for fun..." isn't the right attitude, white males who use women as a sexual object aren't any better then non-whites who lust after white women. Why should a white from Russia, Bolivia or Sweden care about what happens to France? That’s the failure of a mega style of Nationalism. That’s why pan- stile movements such as Pan-Slavism, Nordicism, “Mediterranism”, Pan-Americanism (remember Bolívar?) etc would not work in the long term. of course a WN from Sweden will care more about Sweden then France, but that doesn't mean the WN from Sweden will be totally careless for France. In the case of the Americas, White people created our countries, but I don’t see any contradiction in being a Nationalist in a mixed race Nation and being White.Being a White Brazilian Nationalist is one thing, and being a Brazilian White Nationalist is another very different thing. I prefer a patriotic Negro or Mestizo to a coward White who in case of war would run away to the US or Europe, like many would do. That doesn’t mean you’ll mix with the Negro’s or Mestizo’s sister though. Thats because you are a Mexican nationalist, not a WN. Do you believe most “Whites” in Latin America would be willing to live in an all white state or getting rid of Mestizos, Blacks etc? I don’t think the whites would be willing to occupy the jobs that the most of mixed people have right now, which they’d have to in case of getting rid of them. Just imagine an all white society in which Whites would pick up the garbage, wash your car etc. do whites really need to pay people to clean their houses, wash their cars, put gas on their cars, etc..., in todays Latin American society many jobs aren't needed to get the society going, many of those unnecessary jobs are created by the government to reduse unemployed rates, and also there are many poor white families, there is nothing wrong with working class whites, in the past the majority of factory workers and rural workers where white in Brazil. |
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jan 18, 2004 12:27:14 GMT -5
dating leads to relationships and eventually marriage, using a mestiza as a sexual object and later dumping her saying "sorry im a racialist, i was only looking for fun..." isn't the right attitude, white males who use women as a sexual object aren't any better then non-whites who lust after white women. You’re kind of extreme. If both the man and the woman want to have casual sex so it be. I don’t see anything wrong in that if two grown ups want to. I bet the toughest racialist would lust for an attractive Mestiza after having spent two months on board without seeing a single female on the ship. Of course you’ll tell me that if he’s committed to his race he will not do that  . But wouldn’t the adjective “Brazilian” or any other applied for a National entity be meaningless for a WN considering the motto “Our Race is our Nation”. The same case as above. Wouldn’t being Swedish, Brazilian or French be inconsequential to a WN? There’s nothing wrong with being working class of any race. We don’t really need electricity, cars, computers or anything like that but it makes life easier and most Whites in Latin America live pretty comfortably due to their hardworking ancestors and the socioeconomic conditions of the region to start doing jobs they’ve not done for some years now and some which they’ve never done in some regions of the continent. Do you believe a Guatemalan landowner of German ancestry would want his Amerindian and Mestizo peasants to be gone for the sake of an all white Latin America? |
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Jan 18, 2004 13:04:40 GMT -5
You’re kind of extreme. If both the man and the woman want to have casual sex so it be. I don’t see anything wrong in that if two grown ups want to. I bet the toughest racialist would lust for an attractive Mestiza after having spent two months on board without seeing a single female on the ship. Of course you’ll tell me that if he’s committed to his race he will not do that . one can always use the "friendly hand" technic to release themselves when feeling a incontrollable sexual lust, its fast, safe, and doesn't cost any money.  But wouldn’t the adjective “Brazilian” or any other applied for a National entity be meaningless for a WN considering the motto “Our Race is our Nation”. let me explain the difference using Brazil as a example: White Brazilian Nationalist: He is nothing but a nationalist who is part of the white race, he loves Brazilian culture such as samba, pagode, race-mixing, forro, etc..., he supports Brazil and is very proud for living in such a great racially diverse nation where all races get along just fine, he woudn't trade Brazil for any other nation in the world. Brazilian White Nationalist: he is a Brazilian and part of the White Nationalist movement, he hates Brazilian culture, and is very against the popular Brazilian culture of race-mixing, he doesn't like the typical Brazilians and his opnions are very different from a Brazilian Nationalist. The same case as above. Wouldn’t being Swedish, Brazilian or French be inconsequential to a WN? Brazil is a non-white country since the begining of its history, Sweden and France are still white countries, therefore a French nationalism can also be a WN. Do you believe a Guatemalan landowner of German ancestry would want his Amerindian and Mestizo peasants to be gone for the sake of an all white Latin America? most whites aren't landowners, and there is also many poor whites who would be willing to take the jobs of the non-whites, but for a higher payment. |
|
|
|
Post by Kukul-Kan on Jan 18, 2004 20:31:16 GMT -5
one can always use the "friendly hand" technic to release themselves when feeling a incontrollable sexual lust, its fast, safe, and doesn't cost any money. Sometimes you just need flesh and believe me two month locked in a Ship without a woman in sight makes everyone horny. Do you think a normal man would go to bed with an Australian Aborigine? They did it because they were horny sailors who had not seen a woman for Months.Men are men regardless of race. Anyway this topic is getting a bit eschatological so we should give it a rest. Not really. A French nationalist could give a damn about what happens to White Germany, the “historical” enemy of his Nation, Spain, or Italy as long as France stays French in both culture and race. White Croats would gladly see a racially degenerated Serbia if that could contribute to the fall of their very white enemies’ nation. Just ask one of those crazy Ustashi if they’d like to see a mongrelized Serbia if Croatia can stay White. Sweden and France should stay White in the same way every European nation should be. But conscious French care about France and Swedes about Sweden. Mega style movements that encompass different peoples with supposedly common ties have historically proven to be a failure. It was just an example of a plausible situation. A normal landowner would not change very cheap non-white workers who know the terrain extremely well for more expensive white workers. Anyway I think Europe should stay white. Normal people are scared of discussing race or simply ignore the topic so a Racial Nationalism wouldn’t be well received in Europe that’s why my original point was that a Normal nationalism is better suited for that purpose. As for the US, even though the more time passes the more non whites it has. Whites will not disappear there and Whites will be for the most part dominant in the Military, Government and Science. |
|
|
|
Post by nobody you know on Jan 25, 2004 13:01:50 GMT -5
Most are terminally stupid. Its the clever ones we need to watch out for though. It does nobody any good to say that they are all stupid or whatever. That's the kind of thing people said about hitler and look what happened to him. I personally think that "white nationalism" has been misused. There is nothing wrong with being proud of your race, but these arseholes are the ones who make people ashamed to be white, not people who have sex with a black person  White people have done enough great things in history without them having to celebrate the "achievements" of a few sociopathic losers. |
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Jan 26, 2004 16:53:52 GMT -5
A White Nationalist dumbass was recently arrested for littering flyers: "By now, many of you have heard or read that White Revolution Deputy Governor for North Carolina Billy Brown was recently arrested, handcuffed, relentlessly interrogated for twenty-four hours, and then paraded at a hearing where the prosecutress presented the legal White Revolution flyers he had distributed to the black judge and stated that she was trying to get the F.B.I. involved to make his a Federal 'hate crimes' case. That's right, his 'crime' was 'littering,' even though as has been pointed out to the judge and the prosecutor, the 'littering' statute which he is specifically alleged to be in violation of exempts political flyers from being categorized as 'litter.' Bail, though excessive, was granted, and Mr. Brown is currently free pending a future hearing." The funny thing is that he has to face a Black judge. www.whiterevolution.com/  |
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Jan 31, 2004 15:02:11 GMT -5
in every society, group, or movement, you will find quality people and people who aren't so bright but still support the cause. Don't limit yourself to the posts of the WNs who aren't that bright, i recomend posts by users such as Charles A Lindbergh, JohnJoyTree, Joseph Morgan, electrik, Svyatoslav_Igorevich, etc... Most of those you are naming are not bright, they simply pretend to be knowledgable. They look brighter than the rest of the crowd, but that's not much of a merit. If your sister had an adequate education not even living in the Blackest neighborhood would make her date a Black man. I agree with you, though a social-wide education is also needed. The problem with the WN movement is that the type of people around it is only likely to attract marginalized people and to make normal ordinary people run away from WN. Again, I agree. Traditional nationalism has enough components to prevent racial mixing. And its basis are stronger than those of racial international nationalism. Necronomicon, I am afraid to tell you that America as a place for only-whites states is a lost cause, it has always been. The best examples of what must be done in The Americas are, on the one hand, those set by descendents of Spaniards and Portuguese who have remained "untouched" for centuries, living as a separate group within a different society, and that set by Italians in the US, who keep a feeling of their tradicional nationalism and allegiance to Italy, and stick together as a cultural group. |
|
. 
