|
Post by silverman on Oct 31, 2005 20:11:41 GMT -5
Vote in the poll and discuss .
|
|
|
Post by Asian God on Oct 31, 2005 23:49:34 GMT -5
Whites (caucasoids) are obviously inferior to East Asians, intelligence-wise. This is why Asians populate their universities and research institutions. You can argue about 'white inventions' all you want, but the fact is, when whites and Asians compete in the same environment (e.g. in the USA), Asians always win. In this new century, scientific developments are so complex that only master races like Asians will understand them.
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Nov 1, 2005 13:03:29 GMT -5
Ashkenazi Jews should have a category of their own, their average IQ is even higher than that of East Asians. Lacking that option, I voted for East Asians.
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Nov 1, 2005 17:32:21 GMT -5
I voted for mediterraneans as they created the two best civilizations that ever existed.
Ashkenazi are smart but they are not nearly a race, not even an stable admixture. East Asians are smart too, but they have a low standart deviation.
Although i think that all europeans should be clustered together as their average iq is the same.
P.s There are a lot of races missing. And i'm not quite sure why you included mongolian, but not native americans that developed much greater civilizations.
|
|
|
Post by Trog on Nov 1, 2005 17:47:08 GMT -5
Vote in the poll and discuss . Britain should have a category of her own. Italian civilisation was not the product of Mediterraneans, I doubt even Greece was. Iran, Iraq etc, yes, but Italy has a strong central European character. Compare heavily Mediterranean southern Italy to those further north. In this instance, France, Germany and northern Italy would form their own sub culture.
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Nov 1, 2005 18:02:01 GMT -5
My italian side of the family is from alessandria (northwest italy) and are nothing but mediterranean.
Besides, most important roman cities were in the centre/south such as pompeya or rome itself.
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Nov 1, 2005 18:12:24 GMT -5
Trog, that only makes sense if by italian culture you only refer to the renaissance and not to Ancient Rome.
And how on earth was Greece not the product of mediterraneans? off course there were other types, but, What kind of people do you think live in creete, the other aegean islans, the Peloponnesus, western asia minor and sicily?
|
|
|
Post by Hairless on Nov 1, 2005 18:46:10 GMT -5
Whites (caucasoids) are obviously inferior to East Asians, intelligence-wise. This is why Asians populate their universities and research institutions. You can argue about 'white inventions' all you want, but the fact is, when whites and Asians compete in the same environment (e.g. in the USA), Asians always win. In this new century, scientific developments are so complex that only master races like Asians will understand them. On the other hand, many of the foreign students from Asia cheat their butts off in Anerican universities and on the tests to get into them. I guess that takes brains
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Nov 1, 2005 19:13:08 GMT -5
Whites (caucasoids) are obviously inferior to East Asians, intelligence-wise. This is why Asians populate their universities and research institutions. You can argue about 'white inventions' all you want, but the fact is, when whites and Asians compete in the same environment (e.g. in the USA), Asians always win. In this new century, scientific developments are so complex that only master races like Asians will understand them. On the other hand, many of the foreign students from Asia cheat their butts off in Anerican universities and on the tests to get into them. I guess that takes brains I don't think anyone on this earth cheats as much as American students (2002, 74% admit they have cheated at least once in the past year on an exam). If Asian students cheat to get here, it's probably best that they do just to play on an equal footing with their American counterparts. www.josephsoninstitute.org/Survey2002/survey2002-pressrelease.htm
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Nov 1, 2005 19:28:32 GMT -5
"On the other hand, many of the foreign students from Asia cheat their butts off in Anerican universities and on the tests to get into them. I guess that takes brains."
How do you know Asians generally cheat on the SATs or on the ACT?
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Nov 1, 2005 19:29:56 GMT -5
"Britain should have a category of her own. Italian civilisation was not the product of Mediterraneans, I doubt even Greece was."
Wasn't there some studies that showed that Northern Italians were no different then southern Italians?
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Nov 1, 2005 19:30:12 GMT -5
I voted for mediterraneans as they created the two best civilizations that ever existed. Ashkenazi are smart but they are not nearly a race, not even an stable admixture. East Asians are smart too, but they have a low standart deviation. Although i think that all europeans should be clustered together as their average iq is the same. P.s There are a lot of races missing. And i'm not quite sure why you included mongolian, but not native americans that developed much greater civilizations. I'm interested in this standard deviation issue. Can you provide a link? Anyway, Asians already make up one leg of the US research and development engine that keeps the American economy hot. Click here, www.pnas.org/papbyrecent.shtmlto see how many names in that are Asian. I hate to brag but there are so many "Caucasoid" egomaniacs around that I just feel a natural instinct to shove it in their face sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Nov 1, 2005 19:44:32 GMT -5
ahahahaha
So i'm egomaniac. I don't think so. I think i'm just as biased towards my races as anyone who belongs to a race.
I'm guessing you voted east asians too, and you consider your race the most intelligent. There are a lot of east asians in argentina. One of my best friend of highschool was a Korean named Martin Moon and we had this sort of discussions from time to time and he always repeated (as asian god) that there was no doubt that the east asians were the most intelligents of all.
My guess about the east asian being most succesful is this one. Universties are prepared for averagely smart people. East asian have (as you have told me) a ver low genetic diverstiy, but unlike amerindians their middle point is higher than the average caucasoid. Therefore the grand majority of the population in perfectly able to go to college and do it well (unlike lots of caucasoids). Women also have a lower deviation standart and they also have more people in college.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Nov 1, 2005 19:49:27 GMT -5
ahahahaha So i'm egomaniac. I don't think so. I think i'm just as biased towards my races as anyone who belongs to a race. I actually didn't mean you and didn't think of you. I didn't vote. I think Jews are. Counting out Jews, I'm not even sure. Asians don't do as good on SAT verbal as Whites. The SAT is actually an IQ test somewhat, admitted by the board itself. So you are saying the leading scientists in the States right now have average IQ? Click my link. As for this standard deviation thing, you have to give me something to go on.
|
|
|
Post by Batrus on Nov 1, 2005 20:14:59 GMT -5
I actually didn't mean you and didn't think of you. Ok. Jewish aren't really a race, or a sub race. They aren't even related enough to stablish one using their gen frequency. No, but it's true that the more people graduate from college the higher the probability one of them will excell. Investigation isn't totally related to iq. Much of it is simply hard work. The bell curve shows a standart deviation for east asiansof 8.6 and of 15 for europeans. I have found numerous quotes about it, but i don't have the book myself. Sorry to answer so late, but i been looking for a good link, but sadly i haven't found one.
|
|