Race-mixing

[Melani2333]

Anyone who cannot trace their ancestry past 5 generations should not be against race mixing as they don't know their true heritage. This would include most Americans.

If God did not wish for races to mix, He would have made it impossibe to breed viable offspring.

Humans reproduce sexually, not asexually, for genetic variation.

[Crimson Guard]

If that was the case ,their wouldnt be 4 or more races of man...

What Outis said I agree with.I do not believe in race mixing at all.I do not consider Sub-racial mixing to be race mixing either.

[Drooperdoo]

Crimson Guard,
While your honesty is refreshing, I find it hard to believe that, if faced with a really attractive black woman or Japanese, that you'd turn your nose up. I highly doubt it. Your Sicilian blood wouldn't allow it.
I'd trust to a Sicilian's restraint around women like I'd trust a Russian in a room alone with vodka.
Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha.

P.S.--I feel worst for dwindling races, like sub-Saharans. Conquering Caucasoids have made them feel so bad about themselves that so many have an almost suicidal desire to "breed themselves out" by marrying white women or Asians. Cavalli-Sforza says that, within 1,000 years (if not sooner), they'll be totally absorbed--gone.
So, in a sense, racial harmony and mixing is not a benefit to smaller races. They'll be gone soon--and that's always a loss [aesthetically-speaking].
The world should be filled with every variety. Sometimes respect for other races makes one feel that they should be preserved--not absorbed.

[Educate Me]

I think race mixing is neutral and even positive when we are talking about a large group and a small group that can be absorved by the large one.

[Mike the Jedi]

And while I understand the motives behind wanting your children to look like you, if I had to choose between perserving my physical features and love, I'd go with love. Yes, I'm a hopeless romantic.

Also consider that one could apply that same "perserving the race" logic to the point that it gets ridiculous. If perserving the race is really just a way to perserve physical features so your children look like you, why not go even further and perserve the hair color? Or perserve the nasal shape? Or perserve the gracility? Whose to stop you from saving your distinguishing features from extinction?


"See those handsome swarthy Italians over there, Morrigan? Stay away from 'em! No grandchild of mine is gonna be a raven-head if I can help it!!"


"I don't want no hooked noses in my family so don't you go marrying any Dinarics, Charline!"


"Keep your distance from those Upper Paleolithic hotties, son. We don't want no lateral cheekbones in our gene pool!"

Of course, I'm just being silly. But I still think in the long and short of things, physical features don't really mean much. A mother's going to love her child, even if it's ugly as sin. Because love conquers all.

[Drooperdoo]

Mike,
You're so idealistic. Sadly, among the oppressed races, children are treated worse for not looking enough like the preferred race. Like mestizos. Those who look more European are prized, and those who look more Aztec are treated less well.
Likewise a Jewish friend of mine, told me that those members of the family who assimilated more were treated better. It creates a terrible psychology where hair-dye and nosejobs play a prominent role.
And my God, look at US blacks. Take Michael Jackson as a ridiculous example of a member of an oppressed race feeling bad about himself. He's so ridiculously self-hateful that not only will he not breed for fear of having kids who look too much like his pre-surgery self, but he veritably purchased three white kids in order to pretend to all the world that he sired them. (It's a running joke in the media, and one of the women whom he hired to carry off this sad stunt has since admitted that, no, he's not their "biological parent".) In Miss Rowe's settlement, there's a specific clause stating that she can't publicly discuss the paternity. (Nevertheless, she has.)
So look how sad: Purchasing white children so he can pretend and live in a fantasy world wherein his offspring are little German kids.
That's what happens . . . not your idealistic notion of "parents-will-love-their-kids-no-matter-what-they-look-like."
That's a beautiful sentiment. But how many times have we seen the reverse???

[human2]

drooperdoo said:

Mike,
You're so idealistic.

He's saying "live and let live". What's so "idealistic about that? It's down home dirty humility, generosity, and practicality.

As for working for a pure breed, people should just be with whoever makes them happy. Simple as that.
Don't be like those dog breeders.

I saw a documentary of these nutty people who would breed the parent and grandparent generation with their progeny over and over just to create the "pure breed". It was both tragic and comical seeing these old ladies and gentlemen devote their entire meaning of living to rearing the perfect, ideal, pure chihuahua (correct spelling?)

Anyway, it's this dog:


Yeah, some of us are the human equivalents of chihuahuas and persian kitties.

[Nist]

People afraid of race-mixing think that they somehow will lose their identity if Jamal's and Ming's kid sits between them on the family table.

Yes, perhaps the Little Blasian child are a half-breed. Without any heritage. But thats because YOU brand him with those labels.

[MC anunnaki]

human2 said:

That picture reminds me of a Nordicist on tNP who once wrote that he thinks brown eyes are like animal eyes... ;D

[Educate Me]

That picture reminds me of a Nordicist on tNP who once wrote that he thinks brown eyes are like animal eyes... ;D

Maybe they also think blue eyed cats are the superior cat race!

I wonder which breed is the superior race, do blue eyed persian cats beat blue eyed siamese cats?




vs

[MC anunnaki]

The original Persian kitty is Irano-Afghan so that naturally makes it superior. ;D Those blue eyes though might be Nordic admixture, OMG!!

The Siamese is obviously a mulatto.

[Mike the Jedi]

They are both very progressive. The first cat is not what I would call the ideal, or the most attractive, but rather harmonious, as the two aren't always 100% the same, you see. He has a certain look that most people would associate with aristocratic, fine, and intelligent, but no real sex symbol like the second cat.

[MC anunnaki]

The progressive features in the first cat (note: blue eyes, fine fur and an overall intelligent look) can only be Europid in origin. Everything Europid is progressive. This cat's hairballs are progressive. The second cat's hairballs are primitive and possibly ape-related. The most progressive hairballs can be found in cats of Northern European origin. Please keep in mind that black Scandinavian cats are immigrants and thus regressoids.

[Drooperdoo]

You guys are nuts. If you re-read my initial post, you'll see that I'm for marrying whoever you want. (I'm no racial isolationist. In fact, I chided Crimson Guard for saying that he was skeptical about racial-mixing.) So please pay better attention. While I agree that racial mixing makes for a hardier genetic stock (and less imbreeding), I tried to be balanced and admit that there were collateral consequences of those policies . . . which are the eventual disappearance of smaller groups.
That's not hatred or fear. That's respect for the variety of the human race. Excatly the opposite of racist rhetoric--which holds that all other races are inferior and that only one's own group should exist.

[Crimson Guard]

Ah the grandeur Human biodiversity !


Dont worry no one has to worry about me carrying out racial hygiene and cleansing ..not yet atleast! ;D