|
Post by Faelcind on May 5, 2005 1:11:52 GMT -5
I wouldn't say their merely cosmetic but I just don't think the extremely biological significant especially behaviorally.
|
|
|
Post by nockwasright on May 5, 2005 5:24:18 GMT -5
Its only stating the obvious to say that the meterial acheivements (MAs) of a given people (P) depend mainly on the following two variables: (1) Their biological/genetical identity, or simply their ...race (R); (2) Thier material surrounding or ...environment (E). Using mathematical formalism, MAs (P)=f(R,E) Our positions are : - I believe the function f is highly R-dependant,
- You believe it is highly E-dependant.
We are not supposed to agree on everything. But the "material achievement" change in time, and it's not judgement day yet. Plus this exemplification has the fault that in many cases both population and environment didn't change, but material achievements did. Japan used to be more backward than China. Now it is the contrary. How comes? I believe there is a third factor: "chance".
|
|
b199er
New Member
say hello to my little friend
Posts: 22
|
Post by b199er on May 5, 2005 10:00:14 GMT -5
North africans are Quadroons and Mulattos...anybody got DNA tests of modern day egyptians ? i think they are pretty mulattoid.
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on May 5, 2005 17:31:18 GMT -5
North africans are Quadroons and Mulattos...anybody got DNA tests of modern day egyptians ? i think they are pretty mulattoid. The maximum amount of overall sub-Saharan DNA in modern Egyptians anyone has found amounted to only 13%, which is neither quadroonish or mullatoid. This number also included parts of Lower Nubia, take out the Lower Nubia input and the number falls to 8%. Take your bullshit Afrocentric propaganda elsewhere. Modern-day egyptians are no more negroid than Saudis or Iraqis. "Edited to remove flaming, don't use personal insults people."
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on May 5, 2005 17:51:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Shenuda on May 6, 2005 0:17:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by santana on May 6, 2005 0:32:52 GMT -5
alexandrian thanks for that... thank God you are still around preserving the Egyptian people... and identity
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on May 6, 2005 1:12:24 GMT -5
alexandrian thanks for that... thank God you are still around preserving the Egyptian people... and identity haha, thank you much for the wonderful compliment
|
|
|
Post by Shenuda on May 6, 2005 1:26:56 GMT -5
We all thank you Alex You are unique person
|
|
b199er
New Member
say hello to my little friend
Posts: 22
|
Post by b199er on May 8, 2005 11:31:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on May 8, 2005 13:04:05 GMT -5
Those are all average Egyptians, but whats makes yours more "egyptian" than mine. Copts aren't mixed with ARabs. None of these look black mixed. The kid to the left is simply dark but with straight hair and Caucasian features. He looks like a typical Middle Easterner or South Asian to me. The man in the center is fishy but his features aren't expressly Negroid either and he's nowhere close to the 50% negroid mark that being "mullatoe" connotates. The kid on the right is not remotely black looking at all! I don't know what your smoking. He has straight brown hair, very light reddish-white skin, a prominent nose and big ears. He is as Mediterranean as they come. These people don't look black-mixed to me. Maybe the man in the center could have some black blood but it's nowhere near 50%. The rest of the kids look very Middle Eastern. They could be mestizo too. Hook noses and dark skin? How is that black-mixed? These people don't look remotely black-mixed at all. What are their black features? What makes this girl 50% Negro? She has straight hair and a straight nose. The fact that you would consider these kids black-mixed is a simboly of your sheer idiocy. These kids show no signs of black admixture whatsoever. They look 100% Caucasoid to me. They all have lightish skin and straight hair. Two of the kids even have blue eyes (The ones of the left)! Look at the kid running in the background, he's also pure Caucasian. THis is just proof of how Caucaisan "typical" Egyptians are. What makes these guys black-mixed? They're just dark, that's all I see. The guy on the right looks like a typical Saudi, especially his nose. See, most of the pictures you've tried to pass off as black-mixed are pictures of people with no discernible negroid ancestry AT ALL. Most look nearly 100% Caucasian to me. Even the ones that have some negroid admixture do not look close to 50%, which is what a mullatoe is. You've just given me more ammunition and proven the Caucasoid nature of Egyptians because even though you deliberately searched for the most negroid-mixed-looking Egyptians you could find, most ended up being 100% Caucasian.
|
|
|
Post by Shenuda on May 9, 2005 7:21:20 GMT -5
It´s still the same discussion, again and again ... 1) most Egyptians don´t look black 2) yet, there are many Egyptians with black African admixture 3) Alexandrian is heavily biased,inpolite, paranoid and hysteric 4) b199er is biased too (most Egyptians don´t look mulatto) Some little corrections: These guys are certainly not average Egyptians, however I consider them to be 100% Egyptians It´s probable that the old man has some negroid admixture 2 or 3 boys look partially negroid The negroid admixture is obvious.
|
|
|
Post by alexandrian on May 9, 2005 17:10:09 GMT -5
whatever you say Gamed-awy None of those boys by the pyramids look black and neither dot he old man/woman and the two fellahin. Only to your twisted eyes....
|
|
Berter
Full Member
Anti-Blacks to the Bones!
Posts: 113
|
Post by Berter on May 9, 2005 17:42:09 GMT -5
I see no negroid in all these regular egyptians, except in the guys of the 1st pic: We have individuals like these in Morocco, especially in the southern regions. NA actually stands as a good lesson for those Europeans and North Americans concerned by their racial preservation.
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on May 9, 2005 18:21:35 GMT -5
I actually think the old man and woman look the most Caucasoid of them all, despite their very dark complexion. These two look almost East Indian, though if they do have negroid admixture their darker half is Negroid and not Australoid, of course. And like Dravidians, they still look pretty Caucasian despite their dubious ancestry. The guy on the right looks more Caucasian than the guy on the left.
|
|