|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 20:52:25 GMT -5
Im not even going to bother picking apart your post. First off, I labeled companies like IBM when the person was unknown.
2)Cell inventor Henry Thomas Sampson, misread.
Hallam, I think the list is their IMPACT on the last 25 years. Most were invented long before then.
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:01:51 GMT -5
Last but not least, 19) HDTV High Definition Television, as we know it today, was created by a Grand Alliance of companies, about 5 companies, all American companies except maybe one (is Zenith a J. company? If not, then all were american companies) www.skyvision.com/pages/information_center/hdtvfaq.html#t10What where the technology that went into it? ANd who where the inventors? I will not ask you again as you seem unable to comprehend this. Every idiot knows how many Asian work for NASA. The person that founded Jet Propolsion laboratories and was instramental in getting the first man on the moon was a Chinese American (Tsien Hsue-shen). Cohen didn't invent nanotech. Learn to read. Better yet after you laern get a book on nanotech. I recommend "The age of Siritual Machines" by Ray Kurzweil for the novice. The major force in the future of nanotech will be quantum computing. Guess who invented the first quantum computer? Isaac Chang of MIT. Please learn to read before engaging in furthur embarrasment.
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 21:04:39 GMT -5
Russians were the first in space my friend. NASA?
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:06:37 GMT -5
Im not even going to bother picking apart your post. That's because you can't. You don't know what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 21:07:08 GMT -5
That's because you can't. You don't know what you are talking about. I gave you sources, now wheres yours?
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:07:57 GMT -5
I gave you sources, now wheres yours? You never gave sources that had anything to do with the matter. I gave good sources.
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:08:59 GMT -5
Russians were the first in space my friend. NASA? Learn to READ! Did I say the Russians weren't first in space?
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 21:11:01 GMT -5
Lol, how did Europe get into this? , and I was making a point that most of originators of those inventions were made by non-asians (which they were, whether you like it or not, you have gave me no proof otherwise.) BTW, I'm Jewish-Chinese, so attacking Europe hurts me little, lol. You would be better off attacking your own culture or semetic culture in order to get me mad. hehehe I've been here before and used to have an account, I think this is the site for you. www.modelminority.com ;D
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:23:22 GMT -5
BTW, I'm Jewish-Chinese, so attacking Europe hurts me little, lol. You would be better off attacking your own culture or semetic culture in order to get me mad. hehehe ;D Which side was responsible for passing down the crappy logic gene?
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 21:25:07 GMT -5
Which side was responsible for passing down the crappy logic gene? hmmm.......I think only you can answer that one.
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 21:27:57 GMT -5
Lets just agree that both cultures have invented a lot of things and were great innovators, then we can end this silly debate that will go nowhere.
EDIT: Wait? Ray Kurzweil, the author of the book your referenced me, was the inventor of nanotechnologies wasnt he? (that is an actual question, dont get defensive) Or was it Eric Drexler?
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 21:56:39 GMT -5
EDIT: Wait? Ray Kurzweil, the author of the book your referenced me, was the inventor of nanotechnologies wasnt he? (that is an actual question, dont get defensive) Or was it Eric Drexler? No, he's the inventor of Kurzeil's Reading Machine for the Blind and Dyslexic and several other voice and pattern recognition technologies. And don't be stupid. No single person invented nanotechnology. It is a global multi-disciplinary movement of technology and science rather than a single invention.
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 22:02:06 GMT -5
No, he's the inventor of Kurzeil's Reading Machine for the Blind and Dyslexic and several other voice and pattern recognition technologies. And don't be stupid. No single person invented nanotechnology. It is a global movement of technology and science rather than a single invention. All inventions have a point of origin, someone had to come up with the first nanotechnology, before someone else followed in his/her footsteps. Anywho, I guess I'll end with my final question cause we strayed far from the point. I am a strong supporter of the fact that IQ and creativity arent related, what about you? If you agree with me then we have nothing further to discuss.
|
|
Hallam
Junior Member
Posts: 94
|
Post by Hallam on Mar 20, 2005 22:06:28 GMT -5
All inventions have a point of origin, someone had to come up with the first nanotechnology, before someone else followed in his/her footsteps. No, not necessarily. Many times it is hard to tell at what point a technology really started. The computer is a fine example. It is hard to say at what point a computer is a computer. It depends on the definition. Also, My cousin is a scientist working in this nanotech area. He is finding ways of using gene missiles to treat cancers, psoriasis, HIV, AIDS, hepatitis C and Alzheimer's disease and major Third World parasitic diseases, including malaria and sleeping sickness. He has a few patents in this field. His website: www.people.cornell.edu/pages/yc224/If you read on my earlier post on this thread, I said that there is a mild correlation between IQ and creativity. It doesn't seem to be linear. It seems to have some correlation well up to about 120. However, see this article. www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2003/10.23/01-creativity.html It says there it goes much higher than 120. Up to 120, I believe the correlation was about .30 if I remember correctly. Which means that about 9% of the variance in creativity up to that point can be explained by diferences in IQ. ALso, its' stupid to say what people are more creative based on modern inventions.
|
|
|
Post by whoseyourdaddy on Mar 20, 2005 22:21:16 GMT -5
No, not necessarily. Many times it is hard to tell at what point a technology really started. The computer is a fine example. It is hard to say at what point a computer is a computer. It depends on the definition. Agreed then. I guess the only way to find out is to look at who first proposed the idea, but I'm not even going to bother to research this one, I'm going to let this debate die, I have school tommorow. Whoops, guess I missed that. Then you must agree that IQ cannot measure all forms of intellegence, and that it shouldnt be the basis of actual intellegence. I have no bias, I come from 2 cultures that have high IQs, but I still dont believe in its nonsense. lol, I was merely trying to stir up an argument so I can prove a point, but the argument got way off topic. There is no way to measure which race is more creative or not, since both have contributed a lot to the modern world. And I still dont think patents are a reliable source of creativity eithier, dont forget my butter in the fridge is patented, and innovations of previous inventions can also be patented. How can one measure creativity? Who knows? There have been creativity tests that have been made in the past 20 years, but I dont know how accurate they are. EDIT: very interesting website. EDIT2: And also, I think that list was more of their impact on today's society in the past 25 years. Of course, most were invented/improved upon much earlier.
|
|