Berter
New Member
Et si on fait un tour ensemble, Nouna!?
Posts: 6
|
Post by Berter on Jan 10, 2005 16:58:01 GMT -5
@darkstarr, you and your negroe people were/are genious,... EARTH TO YOU !. I'm sure as hell that you dont trust a single word of what you write, man. If you REALLY love Black Africa and its negroe people, answer these : (a) Why dont you leave America, the land of your forefathers' WHITE MASTERS and come live in Africa to help forming new Self-relying black generations !? (b) Why didnt marry a woman of your racial type !?... Were you motivated by your hate of northern europeans when you picked a nordic female !?....
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 10, 2005 17:00:19 GMT -5
Forget 'most important', I'm assuming those dynasty numbers I mentioned were predominately Caucasoid until proven otherwise. why do they HAVE to be Caucasoid until proven otherwise? Ancient was a racially diverse civilization so its wrong to presume those dynasties to be Caucasoid or any race. The people who say AE's were Caucasoid post only a handful of mummies, the same ramses(Libyan extraction) and Thuya and expect that to be proof that ALL AE's look like that. Look at RM's proof that AE's were caucasoid, he posts scuptures only of the less Negroid looking ones and has total amnesia about those others that look Negroid, as if all AE's were Caucasoid based on that.
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 10, 2005 17:00:45 GMT -5
a woman of caucasoid, northern european type? !
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 10, 2005 17:02:51 GMT -5
@darkstarr, you and your negroe people were/are genious,... EARTH TO YOU !. I'm sure as hell that you dont trust a single word of what you write, man. If you REALLY love Black Africa and its negroe people, answer these : (a) Why dont you leave America, the land of your forefathers' WHITE MASTERS and come live in Africa to help forming new Self-relying black generations !? (b) Why didnt marry a woman of your racial type !?... Were you motivated by your hate of northern europeans when you picked a nordic female !?.... Arab, leave my family out of this and my wife wasn't Nordic at all moron, nor do i hate whites. I don't live my life based on the stupidity on this message board. I've never given any impression that i hate whites, but you played your cards about blacks so everything you say in meaningless.
|
|
Berter
New Member
Et si on fait un tour ensemble, Nouna!?
Posts: 6
|
Post by Berter on Jan 10, 2005 17:04:04 GMT -5
why do they HAVE to be Caucasoid until proven otherwise? Ancient was a racially diverse civilization so its wrong to presume those dynasties to be Caucasoid or any race. The people who say AE's were Caucasoid post only a handful of mummies, the same ramses(Libyan extraction) and Thuya and expect that to be proof that ALL AE's look like that. Look at RM's proof that AE's were caucasoid, he posts scuptures only of the less Negroid looking ones and has total amnesia about those others that look Negroid, as if all AE's were Caucasoid based on that. Post a momie showing clear negroid features; The royal egyptian lines were of pure egyptian extraction ...It is even thought that INCEST were the norm among AE's royal famillies ...
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 10, 2005 17:04:44 GMT -5
a woman of caucasoid, northern european type? ! And IF she was so what? Meaningless ad-hominem bs, what does my family and who I date have to do with this moron?
|
|
Berter
New Member
Et si on fait un tour ensemble, Nouna!?
Posts: 6
|
Post by Berter on Jan 10, 2005 17:10:36 GMT -5
Arab, leave my family out of this and my wife wasn't Nordic at all moron, nor do i hate whites. I don't live my life based on the stupidity on this message board. I've never given any impression that i hate whites, but you played your cards about blacks so everything you say in meaningless. Didnt you say in another thread that your nana is northern european and your son is halph nordic !? I do not hate blacks, I just love truth and defend it. Another important note : I never said I love my people; I represent them thats all.
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 10, 2005 17:10:47 GMT -5
Post a momie showing clear negroid features; The royal egyptian lines were of pure egyptian extraction ...It is even thought that INCEST were the norm among AE's royal famillies ... Moron, ever heard of the X-ray Atlas of Royal Mummies by james harris and Edward Wente? Do some reading and stop assuming nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 10, 2005 17:12:34 GMT -5
Didnt you say in another thread that your nana is northern european and your son is halph nordic !? I do not hate blacks, I just love truth and defend it. Another important note : I never said I love my people; I represent them thats all. i never said my son was half Nordic moron, most European don't walk around saying 'I'm a med' or I'm a Nord or Alpine, thats stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 10, 2005 17:16:02 GMT -5
it looks like then your wife is really WHITE. so what? so... be happy! ;D im not saying it is wrong.
i just asked the question because you seem to be quite ethnically centered (specifically, negroid proud). that is great! im not... im disillusioned about being ethnically centered (a disillusioned about my 'ethnic' stock, caucasoid). im enthusiastic of the human identity. but as you are, or at least seem to be, ethnically centered, and so proud, I expected you to have a full blown nubian wife, with nubian children.
cheers!
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 10, 2005 17:19:11 GMT -5
i would never expect to see a nordicist supremacist marrying a mongoloid or negroid woman. nor would i expect to see a mongoloid supremacist (a too ethnically proud jap, e.g) marry a caucasian or negroid woman. you are a too proud black, and yet you seem to have married a white woman, and be too proud about it too. thats the contradiction.
|
|
Berter
New Member
Et si on fait un tour ensemble, Nouna!?
Posts: 6
|
Post by Berter on Jan 10, 2005 17:25:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 10, 2005 21:05:44 GMT -5
The only ones that are called 'caucasoid' by knuckleheads here are the ones from Giza. Those from dynasties 1-3, 11-12, 18, 21, and 25 were Negroid or had significant Negroid mixture, so its hearsay to say the dyanstic ones were all Caucasoid. Back the hell off right now...Iam in denial??? Yea ok chum! Check this: << Di Rienzo et al. (1994) studied the relationship of three samples (taken from Egyptians, Sardinians, and sub-Saharan Africans), using mitochondrial DNA and simple sequence repeats. In terms of genetic distance, the Egyptian sample was closer to the Sardinian sample than to the sub-Saharan African sample. Hammer et al. (1997) used seven different methods to compute population trees of world populations, using Y-chromosome data. All seven methods grouped the Egyptians with the non-African populations rather than with the sub-Saharan Africans. Egyptians' genetic profile resembles that of South Europeans more than the other regional groups in the study. Bosch et al. (1997), using classical genetic markers, calculated Egyptians to be genetically very close to Mediterranean Asians and Europeans. (journal abstract) Scientists at the University of Cairo tested DNA from the remains of pyramid workers from 2600 BC, and found that the DNA of ancient Egyptians matches that of modern Egyptians. That is, the people living in Egypt now are essentially the same as the people living there thousands of years ago. (Read an excerpt from PBS's Secrets of the Pharaohs)>> www.geocities.com/enbp/So you know what..."why dont you go crawl back in your hole in the Sarahan desert"!
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 11, 2005 8:41:12 GMT -5
Back the hell off right now...Iam in denial??? Yea ok chum! Check this: << Di Rienzo et al. (1994) studied the relationship of three samples (taken from Egyptians, Sardinians, and sub-Saharan Africans), using mitochondrial DNA and simple sequence repeats. In terms of genetic distance, the Egyptian sample was closer to the Sardinian sample than to the sub-Saharan African sample. Hammer et al. (1997) used seven different methods to compute population trees of world populations, using Y-chromosome data. All seven methods grouped the Egyptians with the non-African populations rather than with the sub-Saharan Africans. Egyptians' genetic profile resembles that of South Europeans more than the other regional groups in the study. Bosch et al. (1997), using classical genetic markers, calculated Egyptians to be genetically very close to Mediterranean Asians and Europeans. (journal abstract) Scientists at the University of Cairo tested DNA from the remains of pyramid workers from 2600 BC, and found that the DNA of ancient Egyptians matches that of modern Egyptians. That is, the people living in Egypt now are essentially the same as the people living there thousands of years ago. (Read an excerpt from PBS's Secrets of the Pharaohs)>> www.geocities.com/enbp/So you know what..."why dont you go crawl back in your hole in the Sarahan desert"! First of all, quit citing that debunked site. Second, I've read all of those studies and all included studies of Lower egyptians, NOT Upper Egyptians, the two are genetically different, with Upper Egyptians being genetically closer to Lower Nubians and Ethiopians and Lower Egyptians being closer to Middle Easterners, NOT southern Europeans. None of their "sub-Saharan" smaples included East Africans like Ethiopians, Somalis, and Nubians. Those that did use those peoples as samples demonstrated a relationship. Their sub-Saharan samples included Central-south Africans, Pygmies, and West Africans, but nobody has made the claim that AEs were like those peoples, they were closer to East Africans, who are black
|
|
|
Post by Abubakari on Jan 11, 2005 9:32:41 GMT -5
The lie << Di Rienzo et al. (1994) studied the relationship of three samples (taken from Egyptians, Sardinians, and sub-Saharan Africans), using mitochondrial DNA and simple sequence repeats. In terms of genetic distance, the Egyptian sample was closer to the Sardinian sample than to the sub-Saharan African sample.
The truth The study never made any said conclusion, so they person who made that claim is wrong, but the study did say the egyptian population is a mixture between "Africans" and caucasoids. Read the full text for yourself www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/91/8/3166No where does it say the Egyptian sample is closer to the Sardinian sample Hammer et al. (1997) used seven different methods to compute population trees of world populations, using Y-chromosome data. All seven methods grouped the Egyptians with the non-African populations rather than with the sub-Saharan Africans. Egyptians' genetic profile resembles that of South Europeans more than the other regional groups in the study.Wrong, why don't you read the full study yourself and see? You guys take anyone's claims at face value. Thats tudy is debunked because YAP+ is no longer considered to have an Asian Origin
|
|