Post by galvez on Mar 27, 2004 2:16:13 GMT -5
Lately there has been a controversy at Skadi because a Nordicist and a Medicist have openly professed to be attracted to each other. Since this relationship is out in the open, and the threads dealing with this very sensitive issue have turned nasty, I decided to weigh in on the situation.
It's important for all racial and subracial groups to preserve themselves and their cultures. It sends a bad message when a Nordicist decides to date a Mediterranean extremist, and vice versa. However, intersubracial mixing has been going on in Europe for millennia. The Celts blended with the Iberians when they invaded the peninsula, and the Vikings mixed with the Irish when they settled into Ireland. Medicists and Nordicists are products of intersubracial mixing, since no race or subrace is pure. To oppose all subracial mixing is just as unnatural as supporting a liberal mass miscegenation ideology. These are two irrelevant and impractical extremes.
What this case illustrates is the futility of online racialist movements. If a racialist woman who has attacked Mediterraneans in the past decides to hook up with a Med, what does it say about the masses who do not even care for any racialist ideology, outside of the internet? A Nordicist can bark about how inferior Meds are, how much more attractive Nords are than Meds, but his deepest concern, his insecurity if you will, is of a Nordic woman choosing a Mediterranean man over him -- that allegedly inferior, unworthy subracial abomination whose subracial group brought Western civilization. This type of jealousy more than anything else shows who is petty and inferior in terms of mental maturity and moral character.
While preservation is a noble and desirable goal in an age in which the current fad is to become detached from one's roots and sing paeans to the God of multiculturalism, humans are not horses to be bred to bring about a desired racial stock. Humans have spiritual and intellectual needs. Sometimes the person who may attract us satisfies these needs, while technically of a different race or subrace. Humans are not mere animals, and therefore need not be confined to dating or marrying those of a specific race, like cattle given numerical tags. Those who choose to limit themselves to a particular race or subrace have every right to do so.
There is additionally a distasteful hypocrisy in that while some claim to support European preservation, they actively promote the Ladogan legend. The Ladogan legend is used by Germanic racialists to put Slavs down and to assert their racial dominance in the Nordish movement, by emphasizing that Slavs are at best peripheral and second-class, albeit somewhat accepted in some cases. This is pure defamation that only a deracinated Slav or fake-Slav would tolerate. "Ladogan" must be removed from the vocabulary of Germanic racialists if they want to gain a little more credibility, unless they refer to exceptional cases which can even be observed in Western Europe and who exist in their beloved and racially questionable movement.
Those who profess to support European preservation should really think hard about the things they say and write, and should at least acknowledge the biases they carry and the absurdities of those in their movement who believe that the internet is a substitute for reality.
It's important for all racial and subracial groups to preserve themselves and their cultures. It sends a bad message when a Nordicist decides to date a Mediterranean extremist, and vice versa. However, intersubracial mixing has been going on in Europe for millennia. The Celts blended with the Iberians when they invaded the peninsula, and the Vikings mixed with the Irish when they settled into Ireland. Medicists and Nordicists are products of intersubracial mixing, since no race or subrace is pure. To oppose all subracial mixing is just as unnatural as supporting a liberal mass miscegenation ideology. These are two irrelevant and impractical extremes.
What this case illustrates is the futility of online racialist movements. If a racialist woman who has attacked Mediterraneans in the past decides to hook up with a Med, what does it say about the masses who do not even care for any racialist ideology, outside of the internet? A Nordicist can bark about how inferior Meds are, how much more attractive Nords are than Meds, but his deepest concern, his insecurity if you will, is of a Nordic woman choosing a Mediterranean man over him -- that allegedly inferior, unworthy subracial abomination whose subracial group brought Western civilization. This type of jealousy more than anything else shows who is petty and inferior in terms of mental maturity and moral character.
While preservation is a noble and desirable goal in an age in which the current fad is to become detached from one's roots and sing paeans to the God of multiculturalism, humans are not horses to be bred to bring about a desired racial stock. Humans have spiritual and intellectual needs. Sometimes the person who may attract us satisfies these needs, while technically of a different race or subrace. Humans are not mere animals, and therefore need not be confined to dating or marrying those of a specific race, like cattle given numerical tags. Those who choose to limit themselves to a particular race or subrace have every right to do so.
There is additionally a distasteful hypocrisy in that while some claim to support European preservation, they actively promote the Ladogan legend. The Ladogan legend is used by Germanic racialists to put Slavs down and to assert their racial dominance in the Nordish movement, by emphasizing that Slavs are at best peripheral and second-class, albeit somewhat accepted in some cases. This is pure defamation that only a deracinated Slav or fake-Slav would tolerate. "Ladogan" must be removed from the vocabulary of Germanic racialists if they want to gain a little more credibility, unless they refer to exceptional cases which can even be observed in Western Europe and who exist in their beloved and racially questionable movement.
Those who profess to support European preservation should really think hard about the things they say and write, and should at least acknowledge the biases they carry and the absurdities of those in their movement who believe that the internet is a substitute for reality.