|
Post by Nordhammer on Apr 8, 2004 21:27:06 GMT -5
Alright Nordhammer. Since you haven't even bothered to look for information about Oswald Spengler, and since you think that his words are Jewish terms I'm not talking about Spengler, I'm talking about you. You and galvez do act Jewish, and others have agreed with me. I've observed that everytime anyone tells you the truth you accuse him/ her of acting superior (want me to provide the link where you say that to Sigrun?). Sure, link it. It's not about truth or untruth, it's about your constant arrogance, it's immature. Other people who are well respected have said that you are childish and irrational, so I'm not the only one. @nords[ISTS]. I am alright with having some fun ad hominem with him
having fun ad gentem with all Nordics.
And while many won't believe this, I am not all that happy with it. You contradict yourself again... you're having fun and you enjoy it, then you say you're not happy with it. So which is it?
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Apr 9, 2004 8:00:32 GMT -5
I'm not talking about Spengler, I'm talking about you. You and galvez do act Jewish, and others have agreed with me. No, you were talking about those words being Jewish, which happen to be Spengler's words, not mine. I simply quoted them. And you did so because you didn't know who Spengler was. It shows how lightly you use the word Jewish to try to bash others when you can't offer any kind of rational and honest argument. Here you have it ( [source]): That's right. You have revealed private information and therefore act inferior. You continuously whine about people acting superior with you, but the truth is that it is you who acts, and who is, inferior. If there is much wrong about a Nord/Med relationship to you, that is not something that her or I care about. It is private and it should have been us who decided when, where, how, to whom, and if to make it public. Something you have not respected: [source]Still, it was private and it was our personal choice. I'm sure Sigrun knows many things from you which are meant to be private, and yet she doesn't make them public because she respects your choice to keep them private. There is a world class difference between you and any of us. Give names because I don't believe a word coming from your lips. Or shut up. If I am being arrogant is because you are being mean, deceitful, ignoble and stupid. Trimming my words when quoting won't help you make right, but only a deceitful liar and a fake. There is no contradiction whatsoever. I experience a wicked pleasure putting you down because you are despicable and contembtible by any standard. But I have no pleasure with the idea that your misery is splashing others who may not deserve it. Although if they are comfortable with you representing Nordics here, and/or they even support giving you the reason, there is something very wrong here.
|
|
|
Post by Nordhammer on Apr 10, 2004 5:31:30 GMT -5
No, you were talking about those words being Jewish, which happen to be Spengler's words, not mine. I simply quoted them. And you did so because you didn't know who Spengler was. It shows how lightly you use the word Jewish to try to bash others when you can't offer any kind of rational and honest argument. You use words in the sense that Jews do. I didn't say Spengler was Jewish. Here you have it ( [source]): That's right. You have revealed private information and therefore act inferior. You continuously whine about people acting superior with you, but the truth is that it is you who acts, and who is, inferior. You're using old statements that have no relevance now. She has apologized for those things and said she didn't mean them. I didn't "reveal any private information". Your relationship was observable in the public IRC channel, as well as your chat to me. If there is much wrong about a Nord/Med relationship to you, that is not something that her or I care about. It is private and it should have been us who decided when, where, how, to whom, and if to make it public. She has repeatedly stated that a Med-Nord relationship beyond friendship is wrong. Thus your relationship with her is wrong, because you desire her in a miscegenous manner -- something she is totally against. A relationship like that I oppose, and I will speak out against it. I have always professed this. Sigrun too speaks out against relationships she feels are miscegenous. Lots of other people do at Skadi as well. Something you have not respected: [source]Still, it was private and it was our personal choice. I'm sure Sigrun knows many things from you which are meant to be private, and yet she doesn't make them public because she respects your choice to keep them private. There is a world class difference between you and any of us. If revealing information from a private chat is such a sin with you and makes a person inferior, ignoble and whatever else, then you're also indicting someone you don't want to. You have probably done it yourself, so stop being so self-righteous. The matter of fact is that I didn't post anything from an agreed-upon private chat. Knowing about your relationship was observable in the public channel, as well as things you said to me. Give names because I don't believe a word coming from your lips. Or shut up. If I am being arrogant is because you are being mean, deceitful, ignoble and stupid. I would like to, I really would, but they are from two friends of mine. You know both of them. I actually do have cause to let one slip, since that person let slip one thing I shared in private. I respect their privacy so it won't happen unless they give me permission. Trimming my words when quoting won't help you make right, but only a deceitful liar and a fake. There is no contradiction whatsoever. I experience a wicked pleasure putting you down because you are despicable and contembtible by any standard. But I have no pleasure with the idea that your misery is splashing others who may not deserve it. Although if they are comfortable with you representing Nordics here, and/or they even support giving you the reason, there is something very wrong here. How am I deceitful? What have I lied about? How am I fake? I think all these questions are more suited towards you. You being a Medicist/Pan-Hispanic Med who is in love with a Germanic Nordicist. No contradiction from you there? You also disrespect her wishes and her beliefs, since she has made it known she thinks Med-Nord mixing is wrong, yet you continue to pursue her and try to compromise her beliefs. How about you confessing that your apologies are insincere and that you only do it to please Sigrun. Mynydd's version of an apology: His quote after he "apologized" to Dalonord: Mynydd: Right, everytime Sigrun has asked me to apologize I've done it as she requested not because I felt I had been wrong.
Like the time she asked me to apologize to Njörd for calling him a hypocrite, and I ended up sending him a mail telling that I apologized for the public part of it, but that I still thought I was right in saying so.Source - dodona.proboards24.com/index.cgi?board=anythinggoes&thread=1080755421&action=display&start=93Deceitful? Yes. A lie? yes. Ignoble? I think so, especially considering you make a habit out of it. I may be contemptible in the eyes of anti-racists and pro-Meds like yourself, which is fine by me. I take it as a compliment. For you to like me would mean that I'm not trying hard enough. Sigrun considers me a true gentleman, so I must be doing something right.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Apr 10, 2004 6:29:10 GMT -5
You use words in the sense that Jews do. I didn't say Spengler was Jewish. Well, I used them just as he did. ;D And, anyway, since you didn't even know who Oswald Spengler was before now, it doesn't really matter. How come it is not relevant if it is central to the issue? Doesn't it suit you now? I won't say if she meant to say them or not, that is for her to say. Funny. We only got to meet on irc.skadi.net twice. That we were chatting in private is not like if were making love like crazy. Hell, I would have loved that, but I still haven't found out how to make it online! So, if a private online conversation has much chance of just being a friendly conversation and no chance of being a wild sex evening, why did you impune her on the board of longing to have a brunnette for herself? No need to answer, because you are a raving lunatic. We are both white Europid people, and genetics are not the what you would like them to be. And human relationships and love are neither what you would like them to be. You can't expect a woman to be yours only because you have a phenotype closer to hers. I understand this may be the only way for you to ever have a relationship, but I forecast it a disgrace for both you and the woman. As I said, try to live some real and honest love experiences and then come back here and tell me. Your animalistic opinion on love and friendship give me the creeps.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Apr 10, 2004 6:49:51 GMT -5
Mynydd's version of an apology: His quote after he "apologized" to Dalonord: Mynydd: Right, everytime Sigrun has asked me to apologize I've done it as she requested not because I felt I had been wrong.That was an obvious sarcasm that anyone with a grain of brain would have understood. Not you though. The most worrying part of it is that I offered you one special education explanation of how this is a sarcasm, for people with severe retardness, and still you stick to this as an argument? Well, since it's only about copy and paste I'll show it to you yet again ( dodona.proboards24.com/index.cgi?board=anythinggoes&thread=1080755421&action=display&start=90Then, since you were unfit to understand such a simple sarcasm, I had to explain it for you in easier terms:
|
|