|
|
Post by galton on Jan 31, 2006 2:43:08 GMT -5
Are you a Marxist? If so, why? At this point, the only person being disingenuous is you. Are you really that dumb or do you just pretend to be? Please don't use that word highlighted in red. You don't know what it means because you used it improperly in the context of this thread. Don't bother looking it up and cutting and pasting the definition in this thread. It's too late. Your error is already in plain view. The "bell" has already rung and there is no unringing the "bell." You screwed the pooch. Save yourself further embarassment and simply lurk in this thread quietly and don't post anymore replies or you will show truly the depth and breadth of your stupidity. Please, don't leave angry. Just leave. |
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Jan 31, 2006 2:58:10 GMT -5
At this point, the only person being disingenuous is you. Are you really that dumb or do you just pretend to be? Please don't use that word highlighted in red. You don't know what it means because you used it improperly in the context of this thread. Don't bother looking it up and cutting and pasting the definition in this thread. It's too late. Your error is already in plain view. The "bell" has already rung and there is no unringing the "bell." You screwed the pooch. Save yourself further embarassment and simply lurk in this thread quietly and don't post anymore replies or you will show truly the depth and breadth of your stupidity. Please, don't leave angry. Just leave. LMAO! And there I was - giving you the benefit of the doubt, thinking you were just being disingenuous. My mistake. Apparently, you were just simply too stupid. Too stupid to understand what Anodyne was saying. By the way, Disingenuous - 1. Not straightforward or candid; crafty. 2. Marked by cunning, deviousness, or underhandedness Just in case you didn't know. Can't assume anything with retards these days. |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 31, 2006 4:35:42 GMT -5
I was talking about the bolseviks. If you had noticed the russian poster was depicting a red trotsky, not a red army. The early members deluded and naive to think all of what was preached was going to be fullfilled. They were easilly swayed and their suffering was exploited by the internationalists by teasing them with BS about paradise and promising them revenge against the class enemies. Thats what the german poster was warning of, Bolshevism unmasked. If That Trotsky poster was used by the White Army during the Civil War. And they weren't "teasing". They were ideologues. They truely believed in the socialist utopia. Sure. They belived in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise. |
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 31, 2006 4:37:34 GMT -5
Please don't use that word highlighted in red. You don't know what it means because you used it improperly in the context of this thread. Don't bother looking it up and cutting and pasting the definition in this thread. It's too late. Your error is already in plain view. The "bell" has already rung and there is no unringing the "bell." You screwed the pooch. Save yourself further embarassment and simply lurk in this thread quietly and don't post anymore replies or you will show truly the depth and breadth of your stupidity. Please, don't leave angry. Just leave. LMAO! And there I was - giving you the benefit of the doubt, thinking you were just being disingenuous. My mistake. Apparently, you were just simply too stupid. Too stupid to understand what Anodyne was saying. By the way, Disingenuous - 1. Not straightforward or candid; crafty. 2. Marked by cunning, deviousness, or underhandedness Just in case you didn't know. Can't assume anything with retards these days. Too late, you showed your ass in public. It's official. You're a dumbass. I said don't post the definition of disingenuous because you used it improperly in the context of this thread when you said I was disingenuous. Posting the definition just means you're a monkey with a keyboard. It's an old saying that applies to you: "Monkey see, Monkey do." That's you monkey. You saw a shining object {the word 'disingenuous'} that you don't fully understand and tried to use it like a human. Just go back to your cage and continue to throw your shyt at the humans for entertainment. |
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Jan 31, 2006 4:58:27 GMT -5
That Trotsky poster was used by the White Army during the Civil War. And they weren't "teasing". They were ideologues. They truely believed in the socialist utopia. Sure. They belived in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise. Tell me, who was fighting in the Red Army and who was fighting in the White Army? - Me "-naive and easily manipulated Russian noahides. Whom by the way weren't even all that numerous. -Russians " - YOU Remember this? Don't side step. |
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Jan 31, 2006 5:05:32 GMT -5
LMAO! And there I was - giving you the benefit of the doubt, thinking you were just being disingenuous. My mistake. Apparently, you were just simply too stupid. Too stupid to understand what Anodyne was saying. By the way, Disingenuous - 1. Not straightforward or candid; crafty. 2. Marked by cunning, deviousness, or underhandedness Just in case you didn't know. Can't assume anything with retards these days. Too late, you showed your ass in public. It's official. You're a dumbass. I said don't post the definition of disingenuous because you used it improperly in the context of this thread when you said I was disingenuous. Posting the definition just means you're a monkey with a keyboard. It's an old saying that applies to you: "Monkey see, Monkey do." That's you monkey. You saw a shining object {the word 'disingenuous'} that you don't fully understand and tried to use it like a human. Just go back to your cage and continue to throw your shyt at the humans for entertainment. Too late for what? Listen, doofus. I'm sorry that I hurt your pride, but that's what happens when there's nothing to back it up. I know that you're going to keep on yapping the same thing over and over like a parrot. Fact is, either you were being disingenuous or you were too stupid to understand Anodyne. Read my post again (emphasis on underlined part). Do you see it? I gave you two options: either a) you were being disingenuous by pretending to be an idiot and not getting the point Anodyne was making or b) you were simply too plain dumb to get the point I was leaning towards (a). But you say you weren't disingenuous? Ok. Then you're stupid. Plain and simple. But keep on yapping how I supposedly don't understand what the word means. That's the only thing that will make you feel better. The definition was for your benefit (who gives a rat's ass what you said). |
|
|
|
Post by galton on Jan 31, 2006 10:46:36 GMT -5
Too late for what? Listen, doofus. I'm sorry that I hurt your pride, but that's what happens when there's nothing to back it up. I know that you're going to keep on yapping the same thing over and over like a parrot. Fact is, either you were being disingenuous or you were too stupid to understand Anodyne. Read my post again (emphasis on underlined part). Do you see it? I gave you two options: either a) you were being disingenuous by pretending to be an idiot and not getting the point Anodyne was making or b) you were simply too plain dumb to get the point I was leaning towards (a). But you say you weren't disingenuous? Ok. Then you're stupid. Plain and simple. But keep on yapping how I supposedly don't understand what the word means. That's the only thing that will make you feel better. The definition was for your benefit (who gives a rat's ass what you said). Huh what? Wait a minute...................I heard something..............It sounded like a wet fart. Oh.....................It's you again................... I guess throwing your shyt at the humans from your cage has tired you out a little. Now you you've come back to this thread to throw more shyt in here.  I swore I heard a chimp fart. I guess not. |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Jan 31, 2006 17:44:55 GMT -5
Sure. They believed in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise. Tell me, who was fighting in the Red Army and who was fighting in the White Army? - Me "-naive and easily manipulated Russian noahides. Whom by the way weren't even all that numerous. -Russians " - YOU Remember this? Don't side step. Latvians, poles, Germans, Russians, and others fooled into complicity. It's not all that hard to accomplish though.    If they could get people to believe their non-sense no doubt sly jews could too. The point was that they never had a substantial following, and wouldn't have been able to overthrow the govt, which they had only done only by exploiting the suffering of the people and conditions that followed the great war. Why didn't the scum put the emperor on trial to "pay" for his misdeeds, like say Charles of England or Louis of France? It's because the people wouldn't have supported it, because they hated the Bolsheviks. They killed Nicholas because they knew his life and the life of his family could have been an object to rally around, since indeed the Bolsheviks weren't popular and were forcing their alien will upon the nations. The scum should have gotten a rifle butt in the head just like little Rosa, before they had a chance to start their alien Jewish and godless crusade. But you know how scum like Lenin got to do as he had done? Because of Russia's and Nicholas lenient policy to disgusting subverts. On the other hand Lenin and his compatriots had no such leniency, they raged about the seas of blood from all "enemies of the State", which after all was most of the population. An ice pick is as good though. |
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Feb 1, 2006 9:27:22 GMT -5
Duke, please be civil.
|
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Feb 1, 2006 20:28:34 GMT -5
Too late for what? Listen, doofus. I'm sorry that I hurt your pride, but that's what happens when there's nothing to back it up. I know that you're going to keep on yapping the same thing over and over like a parrot. Fact is, either you were being disingenuous or you were too stupid to understand Anodyne. Read my post again (emphasis on underlined part). Do you see it? I gave you two options: either a) you were being disingenuous by pretending to be an idiot and not getting the point Anodyne was making or b) you were simply too plain dumb to get the point I was leaning towards (a). But you say you weren't disingenuous? Ok. Then you're stupid. Plain and simple. But keep on yapping how I supposedly don't understand what the word means. That's the only thing that will make you feel better. The definition was for your benefit (who gives a rat's ass what you said). Huh what? Wait a minute...................I heard something..............It sounded like a wet fart. Check your underware. You see that third shitstain? That would be it. |
|
|
|
Post by annienormanna on Feb 1, 2006 20:38:08 GMT -5
The scum should have gotten a rifle butt in the head just like little Rosa, before they had a chance to start their alien Jewish and godless crusade. But you know how scum like Lenin got to do as he had done? Because of Russia's and Nicholas lenient policy to disgusting subverts. On the other hand Lenin and his compatriots had no such leniency, they raged about the seas of blood from all "enemies of the State", which after all was most of the population. An ice pick is as good though.Steaknife. Do you hope to survive the Night of the Steaknives? 
|
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Feb 2, 2006 2:01:47 GMT -5
Annienormanna, is that pic of you? Is it a veiled Muslim woman?
|
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 2, 2006 12:31:04 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 2, 2006 16:08:40 GMT -5
By the way, do you consider me a Marxist? You'll be less confused after you answer that question. Are you a Marxist? If so, why? No, I'm not a Marxist. Yet, you could say I'm using a Marxist argument with regards to religion. Religion gives people an illusion of happiness, which has its advantages for their "betters." To point out that this is an argument a Marxist would make wouldn't mean I'm a Marxist. It just would mean its a well known Marxist argument. I wouldn't be offended if someone pointed that out. He wasn't the first to notice the scam but he's the one that people remember that pointed it out. |
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 2, 2006 16:10:11 GMT -5
Who at Dodona is a bolshevik? I'm not aware of any. Point them out, McCarthy. |
|
I swore I heard a chimp fart. I guess not.
