|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 2, 2006 16:42:32 GMT -5
Who at Dodona is a bolshevik? I'm not aware of any. Point them out, McCarthy. I was vilifying the bolsheviks, not anyone on the forum. Which is why I asked whom I had to be respectful towards. Certainly Nazis can be vilifed, why not bolsheviks? p.s. McMarthy was an honourable man. |
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 2, 2006 17:22:54 GMT -5
Who at Dodona is a bolshevik? I'm not aware of any. Point them out, McCarthy. I was vilifying the bolsheviks, not anyone on the forum. Which is why I asked whom I had to be respectful towards. Certainly Nazis can be vilifed, why not bolsheviks? p.s. McMarthy was an honourable man. Eufrenio is asking you to tone it down... which the moderators should have addressed a while back. It has nothing to do with attacking Bolsheviks but on your obsession with Jews, which makes up a large percenatge of your posts and almost all of the threads you create. You're clearly agenda driven and this is leading to disruption. My comment was a joke considering you pretend to be ignorant of the real reason you're being asked to tone down. By the way, I don't know any McMarthy but I'll take your word on it. McCarthy, on th eother hand, was an opportunist. Not only that but to get to the commies, many of whom weren't actually communists but I guess he was picking names out of a hat, he subverted the law. Interesting.. protecting America by subverting what makes it special. |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 2, 2006 18:41:42 GMT -5
I was vilifying the bolsheviks, not anyone on the forum. Which is why I asked whom I had to be respectful towards. Certainly Nazis can be vilifed, why not bolsheviks? p.s. McMarthy was an honourable man. Eufrenio is asking you to tone it down... which the moderators should have addressed a while back. It has nothing to do with attacking Bolsheviks but on your obsession with Jews, which makes up a large percenatge of your posts and almost all of the threads you create. You're clearly agenda driven and this is leading to disruption. My comment was a joke considering you pretend to be ignorant of the real reason you're being asked to tone down. By the way, I don't know any McMarthy but I'll take your word on it. McCarthy, on th eother hand, was an opportunist. Not only that but to get to the commies, many of whom weren't actually communists but I guess he was picking names out of a hat, he subverted the law. Interesting.. protecting America by subverting what makes it special. I would think being that a person that cant refrain from personal attacks should be warned before someone attacking bolsheviks. Like you, in your pompous arrogance attacking me personally because of what I say, for the sole reason that it doesn't conform to your American status quo. The land where justice is blind, and apparently so is truth. And becuase you cant actually defend your arrogance with anything other than defemation, which is hilarious when consider who you shill for. What's sad is that you, even at this point, refuse to acknowledge the reality that your high and mighty patronizing only further goes to prove your own arrogance and resent. I have an obsession for the truth, it's you that has an obsession with marginalizing me, becuase of your own mediocrity and irrational resentment. |
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 2, 2006 19:48:25 GMT -5
You can't be this daft. You have a history of attacking an ethnic group (and, at times, another group). If you did it occasionally no one would care but it seems that's all you're about. I attack your ideas and the character behind them. I point out where you're wrong and then add a zinger or two. I don't care if you do the same with me. Well, if it's just insults with no substance THEN I care... sometimes you just give up and go into a rant about how I'm a mean, bad person (picture the tears running down my cheeks). I don't care if someone insults me. Others may be more sensitive. I just expect the post to have more than just insults (in others words arguing a case). You have this tendency to just give up and rant about me. That I have a problem with but if you throw some zingers in as well as keep on track with the argument then that's fine with me. Not everyone is like that and the tone of my posts, generally, depends on the usual tone of the person's past posts. Please don't speak of justice and truth. You don't even know what the words mean. That's why you lose your debates. You have distorted values as you've proven on every topic you argued. Even when you're correct you come at the issue at the wrong angle. (recall the Tookie Williams thread where apparently to you justice means attacking friends and family of his for a crime that HE committed) Apparently no one else has an issue with me (at least not one that attracts major concern). That's the whole reason for my Anodyne's Transgression thread  Yet, you have a few threads asking the moderators to do something about you and it's people from different camps. I personally don't like complaining about people to moderators since they have eyes and can read for themselves but I'm surprised you lasted this long. It seems like 80% of your posts are about Jews in some way with horns and the other 15% is about attacking blacks. I like talking about issues and arguing ideas but with you it all comes down to one thing: the jewy jew jews with you never making distinctions (like you claimed) unless it's a jew that supports your view. The funny thing is you probably don't realize this has nothing to do with Jews. It's about your philosophy of life and it happens to show up when you talk about Jews because that's your main thing. If I was arguing with a Communist the main topic would be the bourgeois. In both cases hatred is directed at two different subjects. People who don't know any better would think it's two separate arguments but at the base I'm dealing with the same type of person. You marginalize yourself. You don't need me to attempt to do so. Your past posts are a history of your flaws. In a way its like your permanent school record. Don't expect the University of Toronto to give you a call. |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 2, 2006 20:49:13 GMT -5
And I have every right to do so, whether they be Bolsheviks or Nazis or otherwise.
It's not a personal attack, unlike yours.
You attack my character because it doesn't conform to your typically American, sociopathic, emaciated and self hating status quo.
Please don't speak about anything, especially if it has to do with me. I've told you in no short words I find you and your BS sickly, Yet you can't not spew it one me, no matter how many times I relay my belief that you're a joke, a resentful arrogant joke that has an obsession with me personally.
Your obstinacy is all you have to keep yourself convinced you're not. It's enough to make any other person cringe.
It would be hard for anyone to be unaware of your arrogance. The reason you don't hear it is because others aren't arrogant have no wish to personally attack anyone, even if it's a creep like you.
The only people I've seen join in your childish patronizing attacks against me, are the same people that haven't a leg to stand on and are forced into slander. It's a pathetic shtick, yet the more I say I have no interest in responding to it, the more you continue to inundate me with it. Your pigheaded idiocy, was, for a time, a novelty, now it's just pathetic. If you meant any of what you've said you would've ignored me by now. But you haven't because you can't, you're just a resentful lowly sod.
I don't even know what that means, but, it doesn't matter, as it's in accordance with the rest of your insecure basket case mumblings.
Just like if you were to talk about Nazis you would, in accordance with your insanity, not mention Germany.
I am not interested in what your personal opinion on me. And I certainly don't want to have the real you, revealed any further. I've had just about as much as one could stomach. So go call somebody that actually gives two shits and a f*ck.
|
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 2, 2006 21:42:07 GMT -5
Yes, you have that right and people have the right to point out your flaws, which includes your agenda. It's a two way street. If you haven't realized people are allowed to react to someone's post. It would be wrong to not point it out and argue with you. If you want people to just nod to everything you say then I suggest you make a forum where all the members are just you with different names. Lol, here you go with your claims that I'm this and that. You never provide evidence for your accusations but I do, which is the big difference between me and you. Should I direct everyone to your posts in the "Tookie" Williams thread? If you want to see a sociopath just take a look in the mirror, buddy. I don't find it moral to attack people who did not commit a crime just because they are a blood relation of someone who did. That's just one example. Ah, now I'm the one with the obsession. I, unlike you, discuss diffferent issues. You seem hung up on making threads about the same topic. You just happen to piss me off more than anyone on this thread with your poorly thought out claims. If I didn't say anything someone else would or perhaps most would ignore you but such a perverted sense of values causes me to act. So... are you back to just making posts attacking my character? At least throw in some substance. You'd be taking seriously if you did. Well, thank goodness you're a man of virtue who creates dozens of threads attacking an entire ethnic group. What would Dodona do with out you? Some people dislike your arguments and are making it known. These are people from different camps and may not even agree with me on many things. You set yourself up with your tone. If tomorrow some dude started posting a thread a day about the evils of *insert ethnic, religious, politicla group here* people will get annoyed. I can't help calling you on your bull. I guess I was born to "fight" My mother told me I never let up during an argument. Oh, how that woman has suffered! I'm such a bad son. Well, I guess you need a wider background of knowledge. It's a complicated topic. I would mention German philosophy. Actually, Prussian, I should say. Are you breaking up with me? |
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 2, 2006 22:52:54 GMT -5
Yes, my agenda is exposing the truth, where as yours is making an ass of yourself while being completely unaware of it.
What I post is reactionary. Your attacks against me are malicious and are an effect of your own short comings. Including the self delusion that your perverted American morality is superior to all others. When in reality the world loathes America, and it's goons, which includes you, a person brave enough to claim Palestinians have more rights than all other Arabs. Ha. you're a farce, everything you speak is an embarrassment, and you, even after being exposed, are still bold in your bullshit.
Ya, what inconsequential piece of tripe should that be? the weather, or how about the colour of your moms underwear?
I post about offenses done to me. After all, I am not in Israel subverting their government and nation. Though, I am sure if I was, I'd find a plaque on a tree with your name on it , in the garden of the Righteous gentiles among the nations, you lying scoundrel.
Nice counter. Did you learn that technique from Abe foxman?
Zionists aren't an ethnic group and neither are Bolsheviks, boy wonder. Nor are fifth column ethnic groups free to do as they please in their host country.
Ya, those fellow throwers of insults are, unsurprisingly, Zionists. At least they have an excuse.
I don't believe you, seeing as she never taught you any manners. Or maybe she's just an ass too.
You need a wider perspective of the world, rather than the world according to you and CNN.
|
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Feb 2, 2006 23:41:20 GMT -5
Some recent quotes from Dukeofpain: "The scum should have gotten a rifle butt in the head just like little Rosa, before they had a chance to start their alien Jewish and godless crusade."
"They belived in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise."
"Which [Russian Civil War] started only because the Bolsheviks were blashphemic. No doubt, there wasn't overflowing enthusiasm of men to take arms against them, even if they opposed them and their ideology. It's not to be expected from people that had to live in a diseased trench for years. Certainly that wouldn't have made them to fond of the czar either. Which is the story of WW1: All nations involved were willing to compromise, some with much social chaos, more than others. And who was there to exploit the bloody and disillusioned nations of Europe? Godless and nationless jews, that wanted to destroy the proud nations of Europe and turn the planet into some disgusting "workers paradise" as dictated by another godless European hating Jew."
"People whom have twisted Ideas, and therefore visible hostility, are coninsidingly people whom are also members of the jewish whining wall movment. "
"I have a fascination of the truth, and jews just so happen to be enemies of the truth."
"More jewish arrogance in Canada [thread title]"
"A person alluding to the simple fact that Canadian media is dominated by jewish-zionist oligarchies,whom spread their own alien agenda, and create bias against TRUE Canadians, is considered; Anti-Semitism. Of course.
If jews don't want me or others to be "Anti-Semitic" they ought stop subverting and conspiring against my country."
"The things you say and the obstinacy with which you say them with, is something to marvel over. Though, not they're terribly unique, or worthy of blame, just a Victim of the neo-zio liberalist judeo-Christian new world order. A culture of filth and insanity that you oh so pride yourself with defending, with lies and slander."
"When in fact most of the supposed anti-semitic oppression, not just from the rabble, but from the govt, came from their own doings. From the time of Catherine the Great there were measures to integrate them into a greater Russian people. Which was aimed at everyone under the control of the Russian empire, yet the jews refused to integrate, as they historically have just about everywhere they'd ever been. There were many settlements throughout newly expanded Russian territory, like present day Ukraine, which had many isolated Jewish villages and towns, which distinctly contradicted policy. In wake of this you have such terrible czarist "oppression" as the pale of settlement. When not only were they given this fair warning but they were even given rewards for integration [which BTW weren't applicable to any other minority that was to be integrated] this came in the form of free land by Alexander I by converting to the eastern orthodox faith. Yet it did nothing, they stayed alien in the empire, and were eventually and accordingly expelled to the pale. It's amazing how this can be called oppression. Same with Jewish conscription, which was reinstated by czar Nicholas. This isn't oppression, this is jews wanting to be treated as the chosen people. Yet it's called oppression, that is: being treated like every other person."
|
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 3, 2006 0:35:49 GMT -5
Some recent quotes from Dukeofpain: "The scum should have gotten a rifle butt in the head just like little Rosa, before they had a chance to start their alien Jewish and godless crusade."
"They belived in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise."
"Which [Russian Civil War] started only because the Bolsheviks were blashphemic. No doubt, there wasn't overflowing enthusiasm of men to take arms against them, even if they opposed them and their ideology. It's not to be expected from people that had to live in a diseased trench for years. Certainly that wouldn't have made them to fond of the czar either. Which is the story of WW1: All nations involved were willing to compromise, some with much social chaos, more than others. And who was there to exploit the bloody and disillusioned nations of Europe? Godless and nationless jews, that wanted to destroy the proud nations of Europe and turn the planet into some disgusting "workers paradise" as dictated by another godless European hating Jew."
"People whom have twisted Ideas, and therefore visible hostility, are coninsidingly people whom are also members of the jewish whining wall movment. "
"I have a fascination of the truth, and jews just so happen to be enemies of the truth."
"More jewish arrogance in Canada [thread title]"
"A person alluding to the simple fact that Canadian media is dominated by jewish-zionist oligarchies,whom spread their own alien agenda, and create bias against TRUE Canadians, is considered; Anti-Semitism. Of course.
If jews don't want me or others to be "Anti-Semitic" they ought stop subverting and conspiring against my country."
"The things you say and the obstinacy with which you say them with, is something to marvel over. Though, not they're terribly unique, or worthy of blame, just a Victim of the neo-zio liberalist judeo-Christian new world order. A culture of filth and insanity that you oh so pride yourself with defending, with lies and slander."
"When in fact most of the supposed anti-semitic oppression, not just from the rabble, but from the govt, came from their own doings. From the time of Catherine the Great there were measures to integrate them into a greater Russian people. Which was aimed at everyone under the control of the Russian empire, yet the jews refused to integrate, as they historically have just about everywhere they'd ever been. There were many settlements throughout newly expanded Russian territory, like present day Ukraine, which had many isolated Jewish villages and towns, which distinctly contradicted policy. In wake of this you have such terrible czarist "oppression" as the pale of settlement. When not only were they given this fair warning but they were even given rewards for integration [which BTW weren't applicable to any other minority that was to be integrated] this came in the form of free land by Alexander I by converting to the eastern orthodox faith. Yet it did nothing, they stayed alien in the empire, and were eventually and accordingly expelled to the pale. It's amazing how this can be called oppression. Same with Jewish conscription, which was reinstated by czar Nicholas. This isn't oppression, this is jews wanting to be treated as the chosen people. Yet it's called oppression, that is: being treated like every other person."
Bolshevism killed 30+ million Russians. Rosa Luxembourg, if successful, would've seen Germany usher in a similar and every bit as terrible, rule. My view is that the bolsheviks desevered the same fate as Luxemberg. Zionist are actively subverting and imposing their alien will upon my country. Jews and Jewish organizations have a long history of lying. They also have a characteristic of promoting the idea that their suffering is somehow more important than the suffering of the rest of the world. Jews in Russia played a most, in fact the most, profound role in what history [well American history anyways] now dubs inherent Russian Jew hating. Just as the rest of the story of antisemitism is, in its entirety. Consequential of the Jewish group, not inherent hate that afflicts non-jews. Now how about posting some of my unprovoked attacks against you... Can you?  I certainly can for you and anodyne. You certainly have proven yourself as being incapable in describing what was wrong with anything I said, just as anodyne. Since it doesn't stem from your knowledge of what I say as being a falsehood, but rather that you personally dont like it having been said. |
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Feb 3, 2006 0:42:27 GMT -5
Some recent quotes from Dukeofpain: "The scum should have gotten a rifle butt in the head just like little Rosa, before they had a chance to start their alien Jewish and godless crusade."
"They belived in a socialist utopia so much that they were willing to murder 30+ million people to impose and sustain it. Jews, godless or not, had no buisness deciding whats right and whats wrong for europe or europeans, or playing any part in politics at all. To speak for the people you have to be one of them, and jews weren't, they were the nation within nations. All they had was BS rhetoric. And what followed after the swindle was death, destruction, depression and other characteristics of paradise."
"Which [Russian Civil War] started only because the Bolsheviks were blashphemic. No doubt, there wasn't overflowing enthusiasm of men to take arms against them, even if they opposed them and their ideology. It's not to be expected from people that had to live in a diseased trench for years. Certainly that wouldn't have made them to fond of the czar either. Which is the story of WW1: All nations involved were willing to compromise, some with much social chaos, more than others. And who was there to exploit the bloody and disillusioned nations of Europe? Godless and nationless jews, that wanted to destroy the proud nations of Europe and turn the planet into some disgusting "workers paradise" as dictated by another godless European hating Jew."
"People whom have twisted Ideas, and therefore visible hostility, are coninsidingly people whom are also members of the jewish whining wall movment. "
"I have a fascination of the truth, and jews just so happen to be enemies of the truth."
"More jewish arrogance in Canada [thread title]"
"A person alluding to the simple fact that Canadian media is dominated by jewish-zionist oligarchies,whom spread their own alien agenda, and create bias against TRUE Canadians, is considered; Anti-Semitism. Of course.
If jews don't want me or others to be "Anti-Semitic" they ought stop subverting and conspiring against my country."
"The things you say and the obstinacy with which you say them with, is something to marvel over. Though, not they're terribly unique, or worthy of blame, just a Victim of the neo-zio liberalist judeo-Christian new world order. A culture of filth and insanity that you oh so pride yourself with defending, with lies and slander."
"When in fact most of the supposed anti-semitic oppression, not just from the rabble, but from the govt, came from their own doings. From the time of Catherine the Great there were measures to integrate them into a greater Russian people. Which was aimed at everyone under the control of the Russian empire, yet the jews refused to integrate, as they historically have just about everywhere they'd ever been. There were many settlements throughout newly expanded Russian territory, like present day Ukraine, which had many isolated Jewish villages and towns, which distinctly contradicted policy. In wake of this you have such terrible czarist "oppression" as the pale of settlement. When not only were they given this fair warning but they were even given rewards for integration [which BTW weren't applicable to any other minority that was to be integrated] this came in the form of free land by Alexander I by converting to the eastern orthodox faith. Yet it did nothing, they stayed alien in the empire, and were eventually and accordingly expelled to the pale. It's amazing how this can be called oppression. Same with Jewish conscription, which was reinstated by czar Nicholas. This isn't oppression, this is jews wanting to be treated as the chosen people. Yet it's called oppression, that is: being treated like every other person."
Bolshevism killed 30+ million Russians. Rosa Luxembourg, if successful, would've seen Germany usher in a similar and every bit as terrible, rule. Zionist are actively subverting and imposing their alien will upon my country. Jews and Jewish organizations have a long history of lying. They also have a characteristic of promoting the idea that their suffering is somehow more important than the suffering of the rest of the world. Jews in Russia played a most, in fact the most, profound role in what history [well American history anyways] now dubs inherent Russian Jew hating. Just as the rest of the story of antisemitism is, in its entirety. Consequential of the Jewish group, not inherent hate that afflicts non-jews. Now how about posting some of my unprovoked attacks against you... Can you? I certainly can for you and anodyne. Duke of Pain, jews will try to destroy your country to. Why do you think they were kicked out of every country in Europe 600 years ago? They only care about themselves. Jews killed Jesus to! |
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Feb 3, 2006 1:50:09 GMT -5
Anodyne, is that an actual picture of yourself?
Looks completely unlike the 'eye' one you posted before...
@ dukeofpain and vgambler33:
Your comments are quite obviously anti-Semitic. In academic debate it is important to be as objective as possible, and in fact know all sides of any given issue, so that when you put forth your opinion, it is because it is the strongest viewpoint.
So I suppose that the Jews incited Mao into becoming the worst mass-murderer in human history? Stalin also, who launched pogroms against Soviet Jews and was on the verge of a purge of Jews before his stroke? What about Hitler? I suppose the Jews conned him into starting a war that claimed 50 millions? I'll bet the Jews were behind Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, the wars in Africa, the influenza epidemic, AIDS, and every other malady the human race has suffered...
You're both fools. Right-wing Christians that only despise Neo-Conservatives because you're jealous of their wealth. Pathetic...
|
|
|
|
Post by dukeofpain on Feb 3, 2006 14:49:24 GMT -5
Anodyne, is that an actual picture of yourself? Looks completely unlike the 'eye' one you posted before... @ dukeofpain and vgambler33: Your comments are quite obviously anti-Semitic. In academic debate it is important to be as objective as possible, and in fact know all sides of any given issue, so that when you put forth your opinion, it is because it is the strongest viewpoint. Where am I not "objective"? Is it, as in, not mentioning that which oughta be mentioned? You're the foolish one, accusing me of these things when it's clear you yourself don't have the slightest understanding, so as to be able to put me in my place, which you and anodyne strive for. Stalin was married to a Jew, his number one murderer was a Jew, the NKVD under him was run by jews, he appointed jews as the ruling class after having liquidated the native intelligentsia and subjugated the native people. Many red army commissary positions well filled by jews, he also appointed jews to run his own established terror group called stavka. In fact Stalin was behind the setting up of the jews own autonomous region within the soviet Union, a luxury which many many others weren't privileged with. I like it that it's portrayed as an "antisemitism fuel pogrom" by the Jew hating Stalin, and is given so much more heed than the rest of the deaths under the communist yoke, which consists mostly of Slavic Christians. Perhaps it's because jews want to confuse people regarding that time frame when it's clear they played such an important role. Surely saying things like "Stalin hated jews and wanted them all dead" or "jews had nothing to do with Bolshevism", are bound to confuse people. The attack was against Yiddish culture, just like the millions of Russian deaths are from Russian eastern orthodox culture. Yet, you, predictably, prove I am right by distorting and dramatizing an event that in and of itself has no substance to warrant your pitiful patronizing of me. If only you and anodyne would start spending more time trying to back up your bluster with some real, unadulterated truth, rather than spend all your time resenting me personally, you might actually accomplish what you strive for. If you want to know the role of jews under Stalin and the native subjugated peoples perspective of Stalin and the Jewish group, to thus be able to "put me in my place" , read the book: Making Sense of War: The Second World War and the Fate of the Bolshevik Revolution or Slezkine's book: Stalins willing executioners. A Ukrainian poet named Ivan Mazur is another person worth looking into regarding public sentiment. Of course all that would require reading, when it's apparent your main motivation, like anodyne, is to accuse me of rubbish. |
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Feb 3, 2006 16:26:12 GMT -5
Which one?
Who? How is "number one" determined? What does it imply?
How many people 'ran' the NKVD? How many were Jews? Name the Jews.
Which members did he eliminate? What's 'native'? What's meant by "*subjugated* the *native* people"?
Which Jews did he appoint to the "ruling class"? Which non-Jews did he appoint to the ruling class?
It was considered desirable to create a Soviet Jewish homeland as an ideological alternative to Zionism.
Creating a small autonmous region in the far east of Soviet Union, far away from the centers of power, and effectively marginalizing the Jews there is in no way a special treatment, just one solution to the "Jewish Question".
Incidentally, no one claimed either.
You argued that Jews had special treatment. Now you concede that they were at the most treated like everyone else. We're on the right track.
What qualifies stavka as a terror group?
"According to this decree STAVKA comprised of the defence minister Marshal Semyon Timoshenko (as its president), the head of General Staff Georgy Zhukov, Stalin, Vyacheslav Molotov, Marshal Kliment Voroshilov, Marshal Budionniy and the People's Commissar (Narkom) of the Navy admiral Kuznetsov. The same decree organized at Stavka "the institution of permanent counsellors of Stavka comprising of comrades Marshal Kulik, Marshal Shaposhnikov, Kirill Meretskov, head of the Air Force Zhigarev, Nikolay Vatutin, head of Air Defence Voronov, Mikoyan, Kaganovich, Lavrenty Beria, Voznesenskiy, Zhdanov, Malenkov, Mekhlis".
How many of the above were Jews?
-------------------------------------------------
What do you know about the "Rootless cosmopolitan", the "Doctor's Plot", the "Prague Trials"?
How do you explain that official Soviet policy regarding the Holocaust was to present it as attrocities against Soviet citizens, not acknowledging the genocide of the Jews?
|
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 3, 2006 16:58:44 GMT -5
Jehovah Witnesses think they know the truth as well, but their predictions are always wrong. Think about it No, they're your short comings. That's why I point them out. We all have short comings but I'm aware of myself much more than most people, and so I don't feel a need to project my flaws on to others. The question is whether my flaws will cause harm or not? The answer is no. Yours on the other hand.... well... lets just say I wouldn't consider you as a camp counselor. My morality is perverted? LOL! That's like Charles Manson announcing to the world that it's sick, while he's sane. . Once again you pretend I'm keen on this administration. At least that's what you're implying. But regardless of that your view is distorted. The rich kid on the block is always loathed but everyone wants to play with him ;D By the way, Arabs do have more rights in Israel than in any Arab nation. This is the fourth time you brought it up. I provided examples and when you were asked to counter you gave me NOTHING. Here's a fourth opportunity for you to counter. If you are unable to counter then I ask that you accept reality and move on instead of reminding me of your tendency to avoid questions. LOL! exposed? Dude, when was I "exposed"?! Are you going to ignore this question as well? Oh, is this what you mean by exposed? I address everything you say and it bothers you. Next time I'll leave some parts out so you don't feel so foolish. I don't lie. Considering the constant mistakes you make I could play the lying accusation game with you but I realize that you're not a liar. You're typical of a particular type. If there is a hell I guess I'll be sent there for picking on the intellectually challenged. I'm not a fan of Abe Foxman. I made that clear in the "Stalin's Willing Executioner's" thread. Anyway, you're unable to provide evidence, which is what i consider "substance." I'm sure you even acknowledge that when you crawl up in bed and have a good cry. errr.. did I ever say otherwise? You lump Jews in the same boat. This is your attempt, once again, to pretend that you don't consider Jews to be out to get you (except for the few who support your beliefs. I guess these are honorary members of dukeofpain's wall of fame). You make no distinctions, while I do. I don't believe in group guilt, while you have have shown that you do. I don't care. I speak for myself and they speak for themselves. Although, you seem to have left out other people: two Canadians (yes, I consider Wadad a Canadian.. if memory serves me correctly you consider him a fifth column.. correct me if I'm wrong, sir), a southern black dude and perhaps a few others but I can't think of anyone else at this time. Nah, she's a nice little lady. I don't have cable I do like reading The Economist, though. It's the shizzle my nizzle. |
|
|
|
Post by anodyne on Feb 3, 2006 17:02:37 GMT -5
Anodyne, is that an actual picture of yourself? Looks completely unlike the 'eye' one you posted before... It is I when the world was a much different place. Children frolicked in the streets, men did not fear to say they loved their wives, cars were oddly shaped, bright colors were in vogue, and we were all blessed with the comedic stylings of Joe Piscopo. |
|
Yet, you have a few threads asking the moderators to do something about you and it's people from different camps. I personally don't like complaining about people to moderators since they have eyes and can read for themselves but I'm surprised you lasted this long. It seems like 80% of your posts are about Jews in some way with horns and the other 15% is about attacking blacks. I like talking about issues and arguing ideas but with you it all comes down to one thing: the jewy jew jews with you never making distinctions (like you claimed) unless it's a jew that supports your view. The funny thing is you probably don't realize this has nothing to do with Jews. It's about your philosophy of life and it happens to show up when you talk about Jews because that's your main thing. If I was arguing with a Communist the main topic would be the bourgeois. In both cases hatred is directed at two different subjects. People who don't know any better would think it's two separate arguments but at the base I'm dealing with the same type of person. 
I certainly can for you and anodyne.