Post by eufrenio on Jul 26, 2004 17:13:57 GMT -5
An excerpt from an article by Robert Locke: "Conspiracy Theory and the National Question"
www.bestwriters.com/good/archives/00000031.htm
Any thoughts?
Our CCRW (-Covert Coalition to Rule the World) collaborating leaders want America to move towards the kind of bloated, heavy-handed state that most of the world suffers under, to make it easier to merge our system with the rest. They want the substitution of state power for social structure that moral breakdown brings. They want us to have a demotic, globalized, lowest-common-denominator culture. They want us to despise our historic identity. They want to surrender American sovereignty as fast as is compatible with angling for the dominance of the American faction within the larger CCRW.
They want ethnic chaos (euphemized "diversity") in America for several reasons:
1. To destroy America's sense of itself as a distinct nation with a distinct identity apart from other peoples. After all, if we are not a distinct nation, why should we have a distinct government? If we are just a line drawn on a map, why not draw that line anywhere?
2. To destroy America's attachment to its history and thus to its heritage as a free nation.
3. To create the mass society of alienated individuals and warring tribes that can only be governed by the kind of undemocratic tyranny that a world government would inevitably be.
4. To strengthen, in their eyes, America's claim to be the center of the coming world government by enabling it to claim to contain all the world's ethnic groups and to have "transcended" ethnic identity.
5. To profit from cheap foreign labor.
Grasping the existence of the CCRW also suggests the real agenda of the notorious neocons may in fact be different than commonly supposed by their critics. CCRW analysis implies they want to use America's global dominance, while it lasts, to hammer the most recalcitrant countries into shapes more suitable for eventual incorporation into a world government. They know perfectly well that this dominance cannot last forever, but they don't care, because they don't even want America to last forever. This explains their utter insouciance about the fact, which they cannot possibly fail to grasp, that their policies are unsustainable, because tending to deplete the American power they utilize, as by destroying America's industrial base through free trade.
This suggests, interestingly, that Israel, too, is just another dispensable tool that will be discarded when no longer useful. This makes sense of the fact that the supposedly Likudnik Bush administration has drawn the line at Israel doing anything that would interfere with the drive for a borderless world, like build the security fence. When the time comes to dump Israel, the sincerity or lack thereof of individual neocons will be irrelevant, as the crucial question is whether they will be listened to by the rest of the CCRW, which gave them their power and can take it away.
CCRW analysis also sheds a very different light on the question of the elite’s attitude towards racial matters. It suggests that the elite changed its mind about key racial questions not due to moral suasion, as establishment history has it, but because it decided that a policy of white racial dominance had ceased to be efficient to its attempt to rule the world and had become a liability. In the pre-WWII era, the principal means by which the elite sought to incorporate the non-Western world into its global rule was by the European colonialism it had inherited. With the victory of the USSR in WWII and her adoption of anti-colonialism as a strategy against the Western faction of the conspiracy, this form of domination became a liability.
They want ethnic chaos (euphemized "diversity") in America for several reasons:
1. To destroy America's sense of itself as a distinct nation with a distinct identity apart from other peoples. After all, if we are not a distinct nation, why should we have a distinct government? If we are just a line drawn on a map, why not draw that line anywhere?
2. To destroy America's attachment to its history and thus to its heritage as a free nation.
3. To create the mass society of alienated individuals and warring tribes that can only be governed by the kind of undemocratic tyranny that a world government would inevitably be.
4. To strengthen, in their eyes, America's claim to be the center of the coming world government by enabling it to claim to contain all the world's ethnic groups and to have "transcended" ethnic identity.
5. To profit from cheap foreign labor.
Grasping the existence of the CCRW also suggests the real agenda of the notorious neocons may in fact be different than commonly supposed by their critics. CCRW analysis implies they want to use America's global dominance, while it lasts, to hammer the most recalcitrant countries into shapes more suitable for eventual incorporation into a world government. They know perfectly well that this dominance cannot last forever, but they don't care, because they don't even want America to last forever. This explains their utter insouciance about the fact, which they cannot possibly fail to grasp, that their policies are unsustainable, because tending to deplete the American power they utilize, as by destroying America's industrial base through free trade.
This suggests, interestingly, that Israel, too, is just another dispensable tool that will be discarded when no longer useful. This makes sense of the fact that the supposedly Likudnik Bush administration has drawn the line at Israel doing anything that would interfere with the drive for a borderless world, like build the security fence. When the time comes to dump Israel, the sincerity or lack thereof of individual neocons will be irrelevant, as the crucial question is whether they will be listened to by the rest of the CCRW, which gave them their power and can take it away.
CCRW analysis also sheds a very different light on the question of the elite’s attitude towards racial matters. It suggests that the elite changed its mind about key racial questions not due to moral suasion, as establishment history has it, but because it decided that a policy of white racial dominance had ceased to be efficient to its attempt to rule the world and had become a liability. In the pre-WWII era, the principal means by which the elite sought to incorporate the non-Western world into its global rule was by the European colonialism it had inherited. With the victory of the USSR in WWII and her adoption of anti-colonialism as a strategy against the Western faction of the conspiracy, this form of domination became a liability.
www.bestwriters.com/good/archives/00000031.htm
Any thoughts?
You can get a taste of his beliefs from his response to a lukewarm review here :