|
|
Post by Vimara on Mar 25, 2004 5:50:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 25, 2004 7:50:38 GMT -5
So many updates, several sites correcting his bull, and it still wasn't enough for Arthur Kemp to correct at least some of his most ridiculous historical mistakes...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vimara on Mar 25, 2004 8:14:20 GMT -5
Alex do you remeber how he added some articles on "depression" in the portuguese communities??
|
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 25, 2004 8:20:47 GMT -5
Alex do you remeber how he added some articles on "depression" in the portuguese communities?? Not really. I avoid subjecting myself to the pain of having to read that nonsense... Can you provide a link, or copy & paste what he said? |
|
|
|
Post by Vimara on Mar 25, 2004 8:27:03 GMT -5
im not sure if its still up. i'll look around
|
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 25, 2004 10:36:49 GMT -5
From November 9, 2000, in Chapter 22 of MOTT:
Although it has never been established what were the exact numbers of Black slaves imported into Spain, the figure was certainly in excess of one million. Almost all of these Blacks from deepest Africa were then absorbed into Spain, significantly altering vast numbers of the Spanish population.
The infusion of this huge number of Black slaves into the Spanish population finally created the very dark element in Spanish society to this day, quite incorrectly referred to as part of the "Mediterranean" population of that country.
There you have it, folks: over ONE MILLION Blacks were absorbed into Spain at a point in history when the population was at a fraction of what it is today, according to Arthur Kemp in 2000. Interestingly, this claim was recently deleted from the book.
Arthur Kemp's neo-Nazi readers probably can't tell the difference between Puerto Rico and Spain on a map -- they speak the same language, so what's the difference anyhow? -- so it shouldn't be difficult convincing them that Spaniards are mulattoes.
These buffoons are the world's biggest distorters of history. There should be a book or website entitled The Nordicist Industry, (a la Finkelstein) covering the money made by organizations and authors who publish such garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Silveira on Mar 25, 2004 10:47:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Vimara on Mar 25, 2004 11:21:09 GMT -5
really quick (i dont know when he changes it i just check the first to last edits)
Version 2.0 Released May 1999
General Francisco Franco, victor in the Spanish civil war, albeit with significant German and Italian help. Although widely dismissed as a Fascist or a Nazi, he was in fact neither, merely an old style autocrat. Part Jewish, he refused to join Hitler during the Second World War, and was not averse to using Nonwhite troops if it suited him. His invasion of Spain, which started the Spanish Civil War, was launched from North Africa using Arab troops under his command. It was merely the anti-Communism of his political position and the possibility of a military exercise which persuaded Hitler and Mussolini to lend his forces assistance.
Version 5 - Last updated 1 April 2003
Left: General Francisco Franco, victor in the Spanish Civil War, albeit with significant German and Italian help. Although widely dismissed as a Fascist or a Nazi, he was in fact neither, merely an old style autocrat. Allegedly part Jewish, he refused to join Hitler during the Second World War, and was not averse to using non-White troops if it suited him. His invasion of Spain, which started the Spanish Civil War, was launched from North Africa using Arab troops under his command. It was merely the anti-Communism of his political position and the possibility of a military exercise which persuaded Hitler and Mussolini to lend his forces assistance.
im sure i dont have to point it out!
|
|
|
|
Post by alex221166 on Mar 25, 2004 19:06:47 GMT -5
"There you have it, folks: over ONE MILLION Blacks were absorbed into Spain at a point in history when the population was at a fraction of what it is today, according to Arthur Kemp in 2000. Interestingly, this claim was recently deleted from the book."
Spain imported a slightly higher number of slaves than Portugal (if my memory doesn't fail me, I believe it was something around 60.000 - I have the correct estimation in my site but I am too lazy to check it). Spain had ~4 to 5x more people than Portugal back then, and it was in fact one of the countries in Europe who had a smaller % of Blacks in the overall population.
In England, for instance, the % of Blacks in the overall population was actually higher than in Portugal. I am still waiting to see how Arthur Kemp deals with that one...
|
|
|
|
Post by Graeme on Mar 26, 2004 11:25:12 GMT -5
One of my regrets about joining a forum like this is finding out about morons like Kemp. I am interested in anthrology and genetics not racist crackheads with no physical or mental attributes that distinguish humans from simians. Why are Jews or Sicilians declared so vehemently to be non white?
There are a few people in the world like Kemp who believe that blondies are the fairest ones of all and all others are coloured. Nothing short of ringing his neck will stop that simian. What I don't get is what is so good, nice, smart or attractive about blonds? I have always thought that Jesus was short, dark and not particularly attractive, but with an interesting message and satan tall, blond and attractive, but bland to everyone. How would some goatee footed, horned, tailed and red coloured man attract willing sinners? Blond means satanic to me. Vikings means barbarian. Odin, Loki and the others are poor gods compared to those of Mt. Olympus. They are all arse and no class, like trailer trash. Very Nordic!
|
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Mar 26, 2004 11:44:36 GMT -5
One of my regrets about joining a forum like this is finding out about morons like Kemp. I am interested in anthrology and genetics not racist crackheads with no physical or mental attributes that distinguish humans from simians. Why are Jews or Sicilians declared so vehemently to be non white? Actually Kemp has a problem here, since ( Ashkenazi ) Jews are much blonder than Sicilians but seem to be genetically less European. Of course this is a contradiction he will probably never address.  You remind me of the scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail when Sir Lancelot storms the castle.  |
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Mar 26, 2004 12:57:47 GMT -5
Actually Kemp has a problem here, since ( Ashkenazi ) Jews are much blonder than Sicilians but seem to be genetically less European. Of course this is a contradiction he will probably never address. But why stop at Sicilians? Most Ashkenazi Jews are in terms of pigmentation and anthropometric measurements more "Nordic" than Arthur Kemp (he is, after all, a pigmented UP type); and Ashkenazi Jews as a whole are probably more Nordic than a large percentage of Kemp's readers. It doesn't take a lot of Nordic blood within a Caucasoid population to produce many Nordic individuals. I saw some photos of Ashkenazi Jews in this forum, and I have yet to see a single rabid Nordicist as Nordic as a couple standing/sitting at the front of the group. |
|
|
|
Post by Vimara on Mar 28, 2004 10:15:25 GMT -5
|
|
You remind me of the scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail when Sir Lancelot storms the castle. 