|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 18, 2006 10:25:06 GMT -5
This fool Bass, is a complete moron! Unsurprisingly he denies every conceivable piece of evidence from historical to genetic. Look at how he deliberately miss uses quotes of ancient authors and misconstrues them to the way of the typical braindead Afrocentrists that he is...
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Jan 18, 2006 11:43:43 GMT -5
Yes. Ancient Aegyptians were not 'Black' in the modern sense i.e. African-American, West African, etc.
If anything, they were the furthest advance of the Irano-Scythians, or true Aryan peoples which dominated the Eastern Mediterranean.
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 18, 2006 11:51:15 GMT -5
Yes. Ancient Aegyptians were not 'Black' in the modern sense i.e. African-American, West African, etc. If anything, they were the furthest advance of the Irano-Scythians, or true Aryan peoples which dominated the Eastern Mediterranean. Dude, stop posting out of your ass, lol
|
|
|
Post by wadad on Jan 18, 2006 12:00:47 GMT -5
Yes. Ancient Aegyptians were not 'Black' in the modern sense i.e. African-American, West African, etc. If anything, they were the furthest advance of the Irano-Scythians, or true Aryan peoples which dominated the Eastern Mediterranean. OK now that I stopped laughing, in the modern sense even someone like Vin Diesel is considered black, and not just West Africans like here in Dodona. Secondly, are you serious, Irano-Scythians? Do you even know that Scythians are a Turkic (mongol influenced for example like that pothead poster from Cyprus) people? If anything you mean Irano-Afghan, which was never considered to be a component of Native Egyptians, at best theyre could have been some Irano-Afghan elements brought in via the Hyksos invasion. Thirdly, your Aryan in the eastern mediterranean babble does not compute
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Jan 18, 2006 15:35:36 GMT -5
Hold on, Wadad, I like this talk about Aryan Irano-Afghans as the creators of the ancient Egyptian civilization. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 18, 2006 15:48:08 GMT -5
You mentioned Badarian P.A., yes, Badarians are in the literature I saw mentioned under 'stronger Negroid influence' too, as well as the "Pan Grave" people which were Protoeuropid/Cromagnoid as a minority element beside Negroid too and the Kerma group. Kerma and pan-Grave peoples were Negroid Nubians, not proto-Europoid Mechtoid anything and there was continuum is those populations and continuity with A-Group Nubians. Perhaps you have no understanding of the usage of mechtoid in literature in regards to Africa, Colin Groves addressed this issue in Nubians and said indeed they were Negroid overlain with robusticity. The robusticty it why they were called mechtoid because it was believed that only Cro-magnons were the only robust peoples, but that isn't true. They had a Proto-Europoid component, thats at least what was written in some texts I know. There was a constant change in Southern Upper Egypt and Nubia from more Europoid to more Negroid influence and vice versa... However, lower Egypt was never Negroid, not even partially on a significantly high level.
|
|
|
Post by Ras-Xafun on Jan 18, 2006 16:47:59 GMT -5
Egypt's a Mediterranean country. Therefore it's a Med civilisation. And as far as I'm concerned the Ancient Egyptians were caucasoid. I mean maybe they had dark skin like the indians do but are caucasian. because frankly they were too advanced for a classicially negroid civilisation. and i dont mean this to offend anyone of any race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation or anything like that AE was centered around the nile not the med sea, in particular the nile region of upper Egypt. AE had not much to do with the so called mediteranian people until the civilization itself was quite mature. The hellenic invasion was ruling when egypt was in existence for already thousand of years. Ancient Egypt was an indeginous northeast african civilization not a mediteranian one, you med-centricts need to cool it a little bit, you're taking this med thing way to far.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 17:04:25 GMT -5
Kerma and pan-Grave peoples were Negroid Nubians, not proto-Europoid Mechtoid anything and there was continuum is those populations and continuity with A-Group Nubians. Perhaps you have no understanding of the usage of mechtoid in literature in regards to Africa, Colin Groves addressed this issue in Nubians and said indeed they were Negroid overlain with robusticity. The robusticty it why they were called mechtoid because it was believed that only Cro-magnons were the only robust peoples, but that isn't true. They had a Proto-Europoid component, thats at least what was written in some texts I know. There was a constant change in Southern Upper Egypt and Nubia from more Europoid to more Negroid influence and vice versa... Post your proof, the earliest Nubians were very very Negroid, not even close to being proto-Europoid anything. The change went the other way around in southern Egypt. Proof?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 17:09:53 GMT -5
This fool Bass, is a complete moron! Unsurprisingly he denies every conceivable piece of evidence from historical to genetic. Look at how he deliberately miss uses quotes of ancient authors and misconstrues them to the way of the typical braindead Afrocentrists that he is... Answer my question, when did any ancient author refer to "Medits" in those terms I put forth?
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 18, 2006 17:12:51 GMT -5
Kerma and pan-Grave peoples were Negroid Nubians, not proto-Europoid Mechtoid anything and there was continuum is those populations and continuity with A-Group Nubians. Perhaps you have no understanding of the usage of mechtoid in literature in regards to Africa, Colin Groves addressed this issue in Nubians and said indeed they were Negroid overlain with robusticity. The robusticty it why they were called mechtoid because it was believed that only Cro-magnons were the only robust peoples, but that isn't true. They had a Proto-Europoid component, thats at least what was written in some texts I know. There was a constant change in Southern Upper Egypt and Nubia from more Europoid to more Negroid influence and vice versa... However, lower Egypt was never Negroid, not even partially on a significantly high level. Now how many proto-Europids types are there, I'm curious. They are everywhere and every type..
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 17:20:15 GMT -5
I'm going to finally build my very own site refuting that "Ancient egyptian Race Issue" site that Medophiles keep creaming themselves over once and for all. Its obvious the idiot who built that site was biased to one side. he has no problem posting quotes of ancient writers saying Egyptians looked like Northern Indians, but takes issue when the writers say they were black
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 17:21:41 GMT -5
They had a Proto-Europoid component, thats at least what was written in some texts I know. There was a constant change in Southern Upper Egypt and Nubia from more Europoid to more Negroid influence and vice versa... However, lower Egypt was never Negroid, not even partially on a significantly high level. Now how many proto-Europids types are there, I'm curious. They are everywhere and every type.. I would like to know to. I no longer take anything Agrippa says seriously.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 18, 2006 17:22:21 GMT -5
I'm going to finally build my very own site refuting that "Ancient egyptian Race Issue" site that Medophiles keep creaming themselves over once and for all. Its obvious the idiot who built that site was biased to one side. he has no problem posting quotes of ancient writers saying Egyptians looked like Northern Indians, but takes issue when the writers say they were black And you think anyone will go on your site besides EgyptSearch members? Time wasted on Egypt, which you nor your ancestors have been to.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 18, 2006 17:28:13 GMT -5
I'm going to finally build my very own site refuting that "Ancient egyptian Race Issue" site that Medophiles keep creaming themselves over once and for all. Its obvious the idiot who built that site was biased to one side. he has no problem posting quotes of ancient writers saying Egyptians looked like Northern Indians, but takes issue when the writers say they were black And you think anyone will go on your site besides EgyptSearch members? Time wasted on Egypt, which you nor your ancestors have been to. Thats not the intended purpose of the site I wish to build, its all about balance and objectivity. I have my issues with people at egyptsearch and I disagree with a number of things there. Its not about my ancestors or me, all of these civilizations are world cultures because either they influenced each other or another part of the world. I don't get caught up in trying to claim anything.
|
|
|
Post by human2 on Jan 18, 2006 17:33:35 GMT -5
You speak a lot of ideals but they are not you.. Which means you don't know yourself all..
|
|