|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 4, 2006 2:40:36 GMT -5
Minority and were historically brought as slaves like in all the caucasoid world.
[/quote]
This is a lie, but I'm not going to waste my time further elaborating, especially when maternally there's more mixture from European females[with recent mixture maternally from European slave females], both in prehistory and as recent admixture. If you would have read the paper by Groves and Thorne, the so-called imaginary line that separates "Caucasoids" and "Negroids" was much farther north than what it is now and even in the Mahghreb you had small numbers of peoples who resembled the West African Elongated type there. Thats why lineages like E1 and A arrived in Portugal via North Africa via a pre-Neolithic migration from the Sahel-Sahara area because before dessication of the Sahara there was no barriers. Dude seriously, please cite some sources to back your claims up, beyond that all you're doing is spitting out worthless anthropology.
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 4, 2006 3:05:09 GMT -5
"The physical variability of the skeletons associated with Capsian sites suggests that we are not dealing with a single immigration, but with a series of small groups. Th general, however, the indivuals were tall(1.74m on average) and long-headed, with high foreheads: Camps characterization of them as 'proto-Mediterraneans' is loose but effective" Michael Brett and Elizabeth Fentress, "The Berbers", p.12 If even read more of Gabriel camps work, he thought the descendants of the Berbers arrived in a migration from the eastern Mediterranean who were similar to the Natufians skeletally. here's another paper to start you off www.ualberta.ca/~dlubell/Ency_Maghreb.pdf
|
|
|
Post by Agrippa on Jan 4, 2006 10:55:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by nymos on Jan 4, 2006 13:57:41 GMT -5
Shouldn't it be Berberids = Old Cromag Amazighs U Capsids ? mathematically Your formula defines the Berberid set as a set of elements while mine sees it as a set of sub-sets. Yeah, your Berberid is a set of two sets. So how do you write this mathematically "Zidane is Berberid"?
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 4, 2006 18:43:31 GMT -5
I see we are blindly following Pontikos logic again, now where in that genetic study did it say "prehistoric North Africans were Caucasoid"? The study was done on Taforalt which are just one set of North Africans, you also have Mechta-Afalou who wasn't tested and those results were based on just one locus[mtDNA]. Ata any rate, why follow Pontikos logic? Taforalt skeletal remains were Caucasoid[Groves and Thorne,1999], but Taforalt doesn't constitute all North Africans. Thats just Pontikos blindnly jumping to conclusions.
|
|