|
Post by $$$ FD $$$ on Jan 2, 2006 15:02:09 GMT -5
weddids are moist somewhat infantile, protomorphical indids, they are the antithetical opposite of over specialized irano afghan cromagnoids, east asian mongolids and native australians - vedda.org/pix/bingoda450.jpg
|
|
|
Post by ibra on Jan 2, 2006 21:22:52 GMT -5
The South Asian gene pool is distinct, and segregated from East Eurasian and West Eurasian mtDNA with overlaps that happen in clines; you couldn’t get any simpler than that. The West Eurasian mtDNA only amounts to 17% for India. Haplogroups W and U7 are counted as “West Eurasian” despite being in the region since the Palaeolithic.
I will do as I want and will be delighted to offend anyone who needs a wakeup call. I am a person of South Asian decent, so I have the right to inquire and conjecture about my past present and future. I don’t accept 19th century propaganda and fairly tale linguistics as universal truths. I’m inclined to utilize modern anthropology, linguistics and genetics, to paint a clear picture of South Asian prehistory, not one we’ve been force feed by westerners.
I don’t claim to have “figured it all out”, but at the same time I’m not lazy enough to accept things the way they are. Indians need to do their own Anthropology, rather than relying on westerners to do it for them. If they continue this idle mindset, theories regarding South Asians will always be routed in Nordism or Eurocentrics. If you want to believe Dravidians are wild men from the Middle East go right ahead, but I and others have a different take thats closer to reality.
What part of “North West India” don’t you understand, and yes the people of South Pakistan have less Caucasian influence than those of North Pakistan. West Eurasian Influence increases in proximity to Afghanistan, but is much shaper at the Iran/Pakistan border, much like the East Eurasian Influence on Eastern India.
Incorrect, South Asian mtDNA is the majority even in North West India.
“Broadly, the average proportion of mtDNAs from West Eurasia among Indian caste populations is 17% (Table 2). In the western States of India and in Pakistan their share is greater, reaching over 30% in Kashmir and Gujarat, nearly 40% in Indian Punjab, and peaking, expectedly, at approximately 50% in Pakistan (Table 11, see Additional file 6, Figure 11, panel A). These frequencies demonstrate a general decline (SAA p < 0.05 Figure 4) towards the south (23%, 11% and 15% in Maharashtra, Kerala and Sri Lanka, respectively) and even more so towards the east of India (13% in Uttar Pradesh and around 7% in West Bengal and Bangladesh). The low (<3%) frequency of the western Eurasian mtDNAs in Rajasthan may be in part a statistical artifact due to the limited sample size of 35 Rajputs”
M1 is a 30,000 year old haplogroup that originated with East Africans (Somalis, Ethiopians…etc) not with Yemenis. The presence of M1 in Yemenis is probably due to recent African admixture. Get your fact straight.
Heavy pigmentation is a response to UV ray exposure and temperate living condition like a desert. It’s fact, so stop distorting my point.
Indians, like everyone else is a subset of East African diversity, and not the source of it. Don’t be too surprised if you see Mongoloid/Indian/Caucasian looking East Africans.
|
|