|
Post by Mike the Jedi on Jul 13, 2005 2:54:03 GMT -5
You're right. Turks are Turks just the same. I'm just saying they aren't all descended of Central Asian conquerers.
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jul 16, 2005 2:06:04 GMT -5
Well, they are, just not all to signifigant degrees.
|
|
|
Post by koroglu on Jul 17, 2005 12:20:09 GMT -5
A Turk seem to me more like a Native American than an Oriental... I see the Wolf in his eyes...
|
|
|
Post by Ponto Hardbottle on Jul 18, 2005 12:35:09 GMT -5
Forget those Tajaks or Uzbeks or Kirghiz or Kazakhs or other extraneous Turkic speakers. What do they have to do with Turkey other than speaking Turkic. Tadjiks don't speak Turkic languages. I never actually said they did. I only referred to Tajaks because you did in another post. I guessed you did that to make Turkish people or other Turks appear like IE speakers like Tajaks. My point was that referring to Turkic speakers like the Kirghiz or referring to Tajaks about Turkish people is irrelevent. By the way some Tajaks in Iran speak Turkic language and others Pamirian language, Not all Tajaks are IE speakers or even similar.
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jul 18, 2005 13:52:53 GMT -5
Tadjiks don't speak Turkic languages. I never actually said they did. I only referred to Tajaks because you did in another post. I guessed you did that to make Turkish people or other Turks appear like IE speakers like Tajaks. My point was that referring to Turkic speakers like the Kirghiz or referring to Tajaks about Turkish people is irrelevent. By the way some Tajaks in Iran speak Turkic language and others Pamirian language, Not all Tajaks are IE speakers or even similar. I never mentioned Tajaks. who the hell are TAJAKS anyway? And I never referred to Kirghiz. You like to imagine things, eh?
|
|
|
Post by Ponto Hardbottle on Jul 18, 2005 22:25:03 GMT -5
I think Tadjik have more in common (appearance wise) with Anatolian Turks. You were saying! Liars have to have good memories.
|
|
|
Post by greatness on Jul 19, 2005 13:09:39 GMT -5
Well now, Turk is another ambigous statement. Though Western Turks have some relations to their Central Asian namesake, they are not that similar genetically. They are a mix of central Asian Turks who had conquered them, Aegean like ppls who inhabitated Ionia and Anatolia before the Central Asian invaders, and Armenoids. Maybe a little bit of Iranid too. Eastern Turks in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are much more purer, with a probably only a little bit of Iranid. Turkic groups in Iran on the other hand speak Turkic languages and customs, but are genetically Iranid. So Turk can mean a lot of things. Shahnameh, an Iranian book which describes the battles between Iranids, Turanids and Turks, is mythologized but still provides some good insight. I that book There are Iranids in Iran, Turanids (I'm guessing they are Uralic or Mongolid group) and in between is a mixture called the Turks. I suppose this is how the Turkic race came about and later spread to Anatolia. As for Negroid genes in Turks, of course a little bit, but far too insignificant for any purposes.
|
|
|
Post by ohes on Jul 19, 2005 19:27:28 GMT -5
Well now, Turk is another ambigous statement. Though Western Turks have some relations to their Central Asian namesake, they are not that similar genetically. They are a mix of central Asian Turks who had conquered them, Aegean like ppls who inhabitated Ionia and Anatolia before the Central Asian invaders, and Armenoids. Maybe a little bit of Iranid too. Eastern Turks in Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are much more purer, with a probably only a little bit of Iranid. Turkic groups in Iran on the other hand speak Turkic languages and customs, but are genetically Iranid. So Turk can mean a lot of things. Shahnameh, an Iranian book which describes the battles between Iranids, Turanids and Turks, is mythologized but still provides some good insight. I that book There are Iranids in Iran, Turanids (I'm guessing they are Uralic or Mongolid group) and in between is a mixture called the Turks. I suppose this is how the Turkic race came about and later spread to Anatolia. As for Negroid genes in Turks, of course a little bit, but far too insignificant for any purposes. Did you even bother to read the thread before posting? Leave the dead horse alone.
|
|
|
Post by greatness on Jul 19, 2005 20:11:56 GMT -5
Ohes,
Well at least I tried. Why don't u at least actually post info instead of making stupid little comments.
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jul 19, 2005 23:50:08 GMT -5
I think Tadjik have more in common (appearance wise) with Anatolian Turks. You were saying! Liars have to have good memories. those are tadjiks and they speak IE languages. I guess you still think that I am Turk and want to talk to me more, right?
|
|
|
Post by Ponto Hardbottle on Jul 20, 2005 1:03:44 GMT -5
What I think about you is unprintable. As for whichever ethnic group you belong to, I feel sorry for them. Not all Tajiks speak IE languages as I mentioned. What is important is that you were the one who mentioned Tajiks first, then denied it. Credibility, zilch.
|
|
|
Post by gee on Jul 20, 2005 2:07:58 GMT -5
Not all Tajiks speak IE languages as I mentioned. What is important is that you were the one who mentioned Tajiks first, then denied it. Credibility, zilch. Yeah, yeah, yeah, it is incredible. Here is you stupid post where you were saying that you never said that Tadjiks speak Turkic languages, no you say the opposite, get some education, old fart. Tadjiks don't speak Turkic languages. I never actually said they did. I only referred to Tajaks because you did in another post. I guessed you did that to make Turkish people or other Turks appear like IE speakers like Tajaks. My point was that referring to Turkic speakers like the Kirghiz or referring to Tajaks about Turkish people is irrelevent. By the way some Tajaks in Iran speak Turkic language and others Pamirian language, Not all Tajaks are IE speakers or even similar. As for whichever ethnic group you belong to, I feel sorry for them. And why is that? Because you think that i am Turk? ;D ;D You are mental case. Where are you from? Armenia, right? No way, some swiss will stalk Turks on the forums. ;D ;D
|
|
Siafu X
Full Member
Is man one of God's blunders or is God one of man's blunders
Posts: 206
|
Post by Siafu X on Dec 28, 2005 20:21:22 GMT -5
i can see a resemblence between Turks and Amerinds and how they might have a common ancestor they both got used to the horse pretty quikly and became superb riders hmm...makes u ponder
|
|
Mjora
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by Mjora on Dec 30, 2005 5:37:45 GMT -5
Conclusion:According to the latest research there are 800 000 black turks. This family is mixed.Their grand mother is the princess og Baga tribe grand father is Turk. The man is afro-turk here. Another Afro-turk.
|
|
Mjora
New Member
Posts: 14
|
Post by Mjora on Dec 30, 2005 12:34:47 GMT -5
I didn't say black admixture I said afro-turks.I don't believe the black admixture in turks.
|
|