Just because I do not agree doesnt mean that I havent read your stuff.
It is up to you if you do not accept that you must die, alone what you accept or not doesnt change anything.
Hey be fair, dont mix everything up like you want.
I said the racial differences are there, no matter if Africans by themselves recognize them or not.
But you said that there is NO DISTINCTION between Northern and Southern Africa by Africans themselves, but thats nonsence, because the AL and Islam divides this continent.
Thats a distinction made by Africans themselves and that the OAU exists, more on paper than in reality especially for the states of the AL, change nothing about it.
They are both influenced by Northern tribes and as I said, that there is a mixed zone and influences from the North in the South and other way around doesnt make any difference for the general distinction which clearly exists.
Thats not true for all, but if you call them "Afroasiatic" or Hamitic, I used both terms if you read carefully to avoid any discussion about that, doesnt change anything substantially.
I know that there exist small enclaves maybe even from Khoisanid groups in North Africa but such minorities doesnt harm the general Europid/Caucasoid character of North Africa.
That if today Afroasiatic doesnt mean a biological-racial distinction it doesnt meant that in the past.
Its about the original speaker and secondary speakers have no value for the original character of an ethnic group.
Early Semits were almost everytime Orientalid, look in the thread.
We can discuss about the possibility that the original Hamits were already something in-between, Proto-Aethiopids, what I think is nonsence, but not that they were Negrids, what would be the point for our discussion.
They are Europids and at least partially Europid influenced. What groups speak that languages today is not important for our discussion.
There is a difference between Aethiopid and Ethiopian, Aethiopid is the racial or phenotypical (like you want) variant you can find in the North-East African regions which are between the Europid and Negrid part.
Like I said, however they came up, they are an Europid influenced and not fully Negrid or subsaharan type.
You speak about the Tigre? Are you saying that the Tigre are typical Negrids? Compare them with Nigerians or Bantus and you will see...
The original speaker of Afroasian languages were all Europid or Europid influenced, not a single group of them which was primarily Negrid.
Bantus is a linguistic-ethnic unity, right, but the original group again comes from a certain region and had a certain type.
And still are most Bantus typical Negrids, typical Subsaharans whereas Afroasians and Berbers in particular are not, you get the point?
If its a combination of more features it would be. It could be a development inside of the Negrid type, but for such developments on a broad base is no proof and so all such features might be considers as admixture.
So an Arabian Egyption looks different from an Palestinian? More than from a Bantu from Mocambique?
Are you kidding?
Berbers dont look white? I personally know one who looks white than many Europeans, dont joke around.
And I know how Lybians for example think about Subsaharans, especially those which do not speak an Arabik language, talk on with them...
Again, make a distinction between Ethiopian and Aethiopid. Oromes are really less Aethiopid and more or less almost fully Negrid, whereas Amhara, Tigre and Somali are more Aethiopid and not fully Negrid.
So if a English men like his new friend, a Jamaican Negroe more than his Germanic fellows from Germany, this mean that there is no distinction between a Jamaican and a Germanic-European person?
Dont fool yourself. Ordinary people can always think non-scientifically, but for the scientific justified distinction it makes no difference.
I know that many Negrids are integrated in North Africa, but speaking about the original composition North Africa is Europid/Caucasoid and therefore white in the wider sense.
Furthermore most Negrids are descendents of slaves and just minor groups from earlier Negrid-Khoisanids survived until now, at least not in significant numbers.
Single groups and individuals doesnt change the whole picture if the majority is so overwhelmingly Europid in character.