|
|
Post by executiona9 on May 27, 2004 16:45:06 GMT -5
Why would you think that? Because Belgium is south of Holland?
Well, France for example has much less HG1 than Holland. France only has 52,2 % HG1
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitor on May 27, 2004 17:14:40 GMT -5
because they are closer to Iberia...  I believe this HG1 group colonize first the litoral and then the interior, gathering and eating sea animals (most animals with shells), was a typical thing. And that provided an higher human density closer to the sea, so the genes from the interior had less impact... Of course that is my suposition... |
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on May 27, 2004 17:47:24 GMT -5
I dont really get what you are talking about but only a small part of Belgium borders the sea, while about 50 % of Holland borders the sea but perhaps you werent talking about that?  |
|
|
|
Post by Vitor on May 27, 2004 18:24:42 GMT -5
I was talking about belgium being closer to Iberia, if the ancient Hg1 people travel closer to sea (where the food is)... This was a shell gathering culture! the closer to Iberia the most likely to have more Hg1...of course I might be wrong.. I edited my previous post I know that holland even did gain territory from the sea, being the wind mills big water pump to drive off the north sea water out of "their's" lands...  Nevertheless pre-historic holland might be a little different from todays holland... |
|
|
|
Post by executiona9 on May 27, 2004 18:30:28 GMT -5
that doesnt have to be the case. France is much closer to Iberia than both Belgium and Holland but France has much less HG1 than Holland
|
|
|
|
Post by Vitor on May 27, 2004 18:32:41 GMT -5
but maybe just maybe the higher concentrations of people Hg1 in the shores from ancient times did provide a "buffer" against other "invasions"...
|
|
