skord
Full Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by skord on Nov 26, 2003 14:36:59 GMT -5
Population Bronze_Age Neolithic LUP MUP UP Erratics
Southeastern Europe 8 20 44 15 11 3
DISTANCE FROM Southeastern Europe
Population Distance
1 Northeastern Europe 5
2 North-Central Europe 9
3 Northwestern Europe 11
4 Alps 12
5 Scandinavia 13
6 Central Mediterranean 14
7 Eastern Mediterranean 15
8 Western Mediterranean 16
9 Basque Country 20
|
|
|
|
Post by Dienekes on Nov 26, 2003 15:17:39 GMT -5
What is the source of this?
|
|
skord
Full Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by skord on Nov 26, 2003 23:50:37 GMT -5
What is the source of this? AWAR  |
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 1, 2003 4:11:05 GMT -5
Oh come on This means I have to dig up the link again It's a genetic distance calculator I found with google |
|
Arawn
Full Member
Posts: 183
|
Post by Arawn on Dec 1, 2003 9:29:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 1, 2003 18:49:53 GMT -5
yuh!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dienekes on Dec 1, 2003 19:44:40 GMT -5
It should be noted that the genetic distance calculator isn't based on published distances, and should be used as an exploratory tool only. |
|
Sandwich
Full Member
La pens?e d'un homme est avant tout sa nostalgie
Posts: 208
|
Post by Sandwich on Mar 11, 2004 16:19:50 GMT -5
I have always been baffled by the results produced by this calculator: the distance between Germans and Pakistani Burash as opposed to say East Anglians, or between Greeks and Ashkenazi Jews as opposed to say Italians seem odd to say the least.
What have I misunderstood?
|
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Mar 11, 2004 16:32:08 GMT -5
Dienekes' response sums it up. It's based on somewhat arbitrary frequency comparisons.
|
|
Sandwich
Full Member
La pens?e d'un homme est avant tout sa nostalgie
Posts: 208
|
Post by Sandwich on Mar 11, 2004 18:12:41 GMT -5
Thanks. I'm still not sure I understand what a non-arbitrary or less arbitrary frequency comparison would be.
|
|
