Pictures Of Indian Mongoloids

[human2]

rudra said:

India seems to have to two types of East-Asians. One is long-faced, has mesocephalic skull ,little-more lighter skinned, and have more of a delicate facial features. Like these Tibetans:
www.sengetravels.com/gifs/dalai-lama-dharamsala.jpg
www.worldtrek.org/odyssey/asia/052000/images/youngmonk_bg.jpg
www.uygurworld.com/blog/tibcarryopt.jpg
news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38473000/jpg/_38473783_children300.jpg

While the others are very roundheaded, having a smaller rounder face, bit darker skin, and more predominate Mongoloid features. Like these peoples close to burma:
www.stayfinder.com/images/travelguide/india/destinations/east/tripura/tripura_women.jpg
www.t2northeastindia.com/images/meghalaya_khasi.jpg
www.gurudongma.com/nagaland/images/Nagalang_konyak_festival_small.jpg
www.saunalahti.fi/penelope/Feminism/khasi41_m.JPG

So these woman are actually more "Mongoloid" than the long-faced, pale skinned types you posted? BTW, the top ones look like they have shorter heads than the bottom group. Africans are long-headed and they have short, round faces.. so?


If you go to Mongolia, 99% of the people have long faces and pale skin. It makes me wonder of what is supposed to be "Mongoloid".

[Mike the Jedi]

Human2, you're back! Yay!

[human2]

Good to see you Mike but I'm not glad I posted although I've tried very hard to refrain from posting upon reading the posts here.

It is entertaining though.. the drama and the comments.

[RUDRA]

human2 said:

So these woman are actually more "Mongoloid" than the long-faced, pale skinned types you posted?

Well what I meant to say was, they have more extreme south-east Asian look. Its hard for me to describe, but their features are more predominate (it stick out more).
www.eholidaysindia.com/images/mizoram.jpg

BTW, the top ones look like they have shorter heads than the bottom group.

Tibetans aren't a homogeneous group, I have seen differences among them. Some in the west are very long-head, while other in the east are very round-headed. So I put them in the middle(most are in-between), is that wrong? www.yakundyeti.de/images/ladakhiwoman.jpg
www.trekearth.com/gallery/Asia/India/North/Jammu_and_Kashmir/photo286399.htm

Don't make this into a north Chinese vs south Chinese argument. we are talking about India, which only has Tibetans in the north, and south-Asian looking peoples in east.

Africans are long-headed and they have short, round faces..

Why could I not put this information about east-Asian looking peoples in India, without getting attacked by you? One is more rounder faced and darker that the other, why can't I say this on dodona? You made a general statement about Africans, which is not always true(because some Africans are both long-headed and Long-faced), do you think its fair if somebody attacks for your mistake? Because that what you are doing to me.

so?

Why do you have to be so rude? you complain there's so much drama in dodona, doesn't it seem like you bring some of fire, on to yourself? YOu could have come out more calmer, and proved your point, but when start a fight, people just turn away from what you have to say.

You have to remember, If you go to Mongolia, 99% of the people have long faces and pale skin. It makes me wonder of what is supposed to be.

What are you saying? I don't put long-face & pale skin as being Caucasian.

[RUDRA]

josh said:

Are the Mongoloid Indians represented among certain castes more so than others?

In india, there isn't much of a caste differences, as many people make it out to be.

Its mostly regional and geography, that creates the differences. The only caste that may stick-out in many places are the Brahmins, because many of them originally came from north India (haryana + UP) to settle in other areas of india.

[human2]

How can you not see that these "extreme", "more 'Mongoloid'" Khasis you've showed look more Indian. The guys in your signature and these women are not that far apart. In fact, these Austroasiatic tribes people of India are often genetically more "Indian" than East Eurasian.

I guess these Bengladeshis are more "extreme" "Mongoloids" as well.

Blah blah ...is that wrong?

Yes, it's wrong, because you don't know what long-headed and round-headed really means. It has nothing to do with a "round, short" faces and "long" faces.

And I'm not mad or attacking you. I was just passing by and amused by your muttering logic. Don't hate the messenger.

[human2]

BTW,
1. The lighter-skinned, longer-faced, sharper-featured indigenous "Mongoloids" of India are NOT Tibetans but Tibeto-Burman tribal people. They reside in the interior Assam (if I'm not mistaken), which haven't been penetrated by Indians until the last 2 centuries under the British. They are the purer stock.

[personx]

I've noticed Mongoloid features on some people from northwestern India as well. Would anyone like to comment on that?

[blueskygod]

there are mongoloid features in every country in asia, even the arabic countries. stop making such broad superficial statements. we don't take kindly to that!

[personx]

I'm not interested in whether or not you take kindly to it.
Just answer the question and don't try to avoid it!