|
Post by herrx on Dec 6, 2003 3:30:16 GMT -5
If the mixed and the non-mixed individuals surive, there is no evolution ocurring or it doesen't involves a specific racial character!
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 6, 2003 11:29:49 GMT -5
Why the hell did anyone mention racemixing in the first place here?
The girl wanted to be classified, not lectured about the pro's and con's of race mixing.
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 14:22:51 GMT -5
Your racial type is Baltic. I would guess Czech or thereabouts, but you could be from anywhere in Northern Central and Eastern Europe and with less probability from anywhere else. www.geocities.com/dienekesp4/europids/Baltic!? Whatever, if you say so. LOL Still trying to erase nordics from planet earth. Hey, lets get prodigal son in here with RM and see those ridiculous threads with the "Who is whiter?" arguments that use to go on for days. Moss is as white as me, you and every other white person. WHITE IS WHITE! Hey Dienekes, remember what these initials stood for? ROTMFFLMNAO!!! BTW - 30 European Faces vol. V? What happen to Faces of Ancient Egypt?
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Dec 6, 2003 14:30:34 GMT -5
Umm...Baltics ARE white.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 6, 2003 14:36:15 GMT -5
Baltic!? Whatever, if you say so. LOL Still trying to erase nordics from planet earth. Hey, lets get prodigal son in here with RM and see those ridiculous threads with the "Who is whiter?" arguments that use to go on for days. Moss is as white as me, you and every other white person. WHITE IS WHITE! Hey Dienekes, remember what these initials stood for? ROTMFFLMNAO!!! BTW - 30 European Faces vol. V? What happen to Faces of Ancient Egypt? We're not interested here in broad categories of white or non-white or whatever other generalization. The point of this forum, and especially this section is in unbiased sub-racial classification. Moss is in no way a classic (halstatt) Nordic type because she doesn't metrically belong to this type. Tsuntzu, if your goal is to classify people in broad categories, please go to stormfront.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 6, 2003 14:39:40 GMT -5
Yeah, but don't trust Dienekes, as Tsuntzu said, Dienekes is 'still trying to erase nordics from planet earth'. Incidentally, I've seen Dienekes shoot two Nordics in a drive-by, so I guess Tsuntzu is telling the truth ;D
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 14:44:58 GMT -5
We're not interested here in broad categories of white or non-white or whatever other generalization. The point of this forum, and especially this section is in unbiased sub-racial classification. Moss is in no way a classic (halstatt) Nordic type because she doesn't metrically belong to this type. Tsuntzu, if your goal is to classify people in broad categories, please go to stormfront. You obviously don't read very well nor do you comprehend either. You are interested categorizing. All I said was she is a beautiful white women. That is all that matters to me. And I also said racemixing is bad. And I meant racemixing is bad for whites because racemixing dilutes or extinguishes characteristics that are unique and special to the white race which I happen to love. So -------- SHOLOM! Get my drift?
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 14:46:51 GMT -5
Melnorme, why are you on the internet on the Sabbath? RRRRROTMFFLMNAO!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 14:52:09 GMT -5
Race Mixing increases the number of different individuals while isolation make the groups more equal. What do you understand about "evolution process" evolution is not an inteligent eye looking us everytime. It's a ridiculous idea... It has no defined end.... If the mixing make an apt individual to survive(what's more probable, 'cause the major diversity), it made the evolution easier.... and helped it... if not, he will die and made no interference to the race, in the worst hypothesis... Racemixing <> evolution Racemixing = diluting or extinguishing pre-existing genetic characteristics that existed in a racial group prior to the racemixing THE TEN LESSONS: PRESERVING WESTERN CIVILIZATION===========> home.ddc.net/ygg/ls/index.htm
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Dec 6, 2003 14:52:37 GMT -5
I'm not much of a bible-thumper, my friend. Anyway, in this time zone, Sabbath is over. You see, Sabbath isn't synonymous with Saturday. It starts Friday evening and ends on Saturday evening.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 6, 2003 14:55:01 GMT -5
Your posts are drifting waaaay off topic, and off forum guidelines. For the last time, this forum is NOT for that sort of discussion, there are dozens of forums for you out there, don't waste your time here Catch my drift, bro?
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 14:59:23 GMT -5
Your posts are drifting waaaay off topic, and off forum guidelines. For the last time, this forum is NOT for that sort of discussion, there are dozens of forums for you out there, don't waste your time here Catch my drift, bro? Yet again, you don't read very well. I have not violated any forum guidelines. I am merely responding to posts being addressed to me. Please tell me what guidelines I have violated. SHOLOM - brother -
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 15:00:59 GMT -5
I'm not much of a bible-thumper, my friend. Anyway, in this time zone, Sabbath is over. You see, Sabbath isn't synonymous with Saturday. It starts Friday evening and ends on Saturday evening. Oh my mistake. Hey what is with this AWAR? He has no sense of humor.
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 6, 2003 15:06:03 GMT -5
You haven't said anything even remotely amusing, excuse me for my high standards at humour.
All I've seen is you clogging this thread with irrelevant posts.
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 6, 2003 15:08:59 GMT -5
You haven't said anything even remotely amusing, excuse me for my high standards at humour. All I've seen is you clogging this thread with irrelevant posts. Is that one of the guidelines? - Be amusing to AWAR or - Be relevant to the thread in the eyes of AWAR Oh BTW - SHOLOM - brother
|
|