moss
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by moss on Dec 4, 2003 21:35:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Dec 4, 2003 21:58:56 GMT -5
you are a very attractive Noric girl
|
|
|
Post by Dienekes on Dec 4, 2003 22:22:44 GMT -5
Your racial type is Baltic. I would guess Czech or thereabouts, but you could be from anywhere in Northern Central and Eastern Europe and with less probability from anywhere else. www.geocities.com/dienekesp4/europids/
|
|
|
Post by herrx on Dec 4, 2003 22:35:51 GMT -5
In the secondo photo look likes alpinid... Are you german?
|
|
|
Post by TSUNTZU on Dec 4, 2003 22:53:16 GMT -5
You're a beautiful white women. I hope you are not a racemixer. I hope you don't follow destructive trends of pop culture and mtv and think racemixing is cool! That would be a waste of good genes.
|
|
skord
Full Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by skord on Dec 4, 2003 22:54:12 GMT -5
You look high skulled.Definitely Nordid looking anyhow,could be Baltid,Neo-Danubian...What is your ancestry?
|
|
moss
New Member
Posts: 3
|
Post by moss on Dec 5, 2003 19:10:56 GMT -5
Not sure if you can tell but the back of my head is rather flat, and I have a cephalic index of about 82... that is if I measured right (?)...
As for my ancestry, like most Americans I am a little bit of a mixed bag... my fathers side is all british Isles (mostly Irish and Scottish, to a lesser degree English and Welsh) and on my mother's side I have a Czech grandmother, also a little more Scottish, Irish, and most likely a good deal of German from my Grandfather... although he never would acknowledge it, being from the WWII generation
Hard to say for me who I take after more, but most people seem to think I have a Germanic look
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 5, 2003 22:13:49 GMT -5
I say you're a Sub-Nordic type, perhaps dinaricized.
|
|
skord
Full Member
Posts: 164
|
Post by skord on Dec 5, 2003 23:32:19 GMT -5
I say you're a Sub-Nordic type, perhaps dinaricized. Could be that too.Anyway, very attractive.
|
|
|
Post by Caipira on Dec 6, 2003 0:42:39 GMT -5
"You're a beautiful white women. I hope you are not a racemixer. I hope you don't follow destructive trends of pop culture and mtv and think racemixing is cool! That would be a waste of good genes." (TSUNTZU) Such stupid nordicist words... If Finns have about 30% of Mongolic heritage, it´s very possible that you could have some non-Caucasoid ancestry... Caipira !!
|
|
|
Post by LuvSpune on Dec 6, 2003 2:03:01 GMT -5
You're a beautiful white women. I hope you are not a racemixer. I hope you don't follow destructive trends of pop culture and mtv and think racemixing is cool! That would be a waste of good genes. can you name scientific evidence that says racemixing is bad? I would think its good, greater blend of immunities, less likely to be inbreeding etc I think racemixing is the one good thing pop culture promotes
|
|
|
Post by herrx on Dec 6, 2003 2:05:17 GMT -5
can you name scientific evidence that says racemixing is bad? I would think its good, greater blend of immunities, less likely to be inbreeding etc I think racemixing is the one good thing pop culture promotes Agree!
|
|
|
Post by LuvSpune on Dec 6, 2003 2:16:15 GMT -5
Sorry if Im a little defensive but Im a mixed race person and it doenst sit right to me that someone can view themselves as better than me based on background. Especially since people at work like to call me exotic looking
|
|
|
Post by Necronomicom on Dec 6, 2003 2:54:31 GMT -5
can you name scientific evidence that says racemixing is bad? I would think its good, greater blend of immunities, less likely to be inbreeding etc I think racemixing is the one good thing pop culture promotes Race mixing is bad because: -It makes different homo-sapiens sub-species go extinct, erasing unique traits -it completely changes the racial and cultural makeup of a nation -It turns all humans into raceless muds -The difference between human sub-species are much more deep then appearance. -Mixing with your own is part of the evolution process that has been going on for thousand of years, race mixing with other races is destroying the evolution process of both races, different races evolute in different ways.
|
|
|
Post by herrx on Dec 6, 2003 3:20:49 GMT -5
Race mixing is bad because: -It makes different homo-sapiens sub-species go extinct, erasing unique traits -it completely changes the racial and cultural makeup of a nation -It turns all humans into raceless muds -The difference between human sub-species are much more deep then appearance. -Mixing with your own is part of the evolution process that has been going on for thousand of years, race mixing with other races is destroying the evolution process of both races, different races evolute in different ways. Race Mixing increases the number of different individuals while isolation make the groups more equal. What do you understand about "evolution process" evolution is not an inteligent eye looking us everytime. It's a ridiculous idea... It has no defined end.... If the mixing make an apt individual to survive(what's more probable, 'cause the major diversity), it made the evolution easier.... and helped it... if not, he will die and made no interference to the race, in the worst hypothesis...
|
|