Post by LordofDiscipline on Dec 28, 2005 17:41:51 GMT -5
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
The radical homosexual movement in America today is no longer the passive, good-natured appeal to "progressive" individuals that they would have the public believe. While a nice boutique of gay-friendly media, magazines and prime-time pro-gay sitcoms may have been enough in the past, now we are seeing the culmination of a whole different side to this very powerful and well-organized movement.
To the dismay of true rights-minded individuals, while hijacking the democratic verbiage like personal freedom and civil rights, the homosexual movement has revealed its true nature as the forerunner to a cultural takeover. As we watch them tack toward a more Machiavellian approach to politics, society and culture, it has become obvious the radical homosexual movement has now become the "vanguard" of a broad-ranging social and political revolution.
The equivalent of the homosexual movement today was the Bolshevik Revolution of the early 1900s led by Vladimir Lenin. Believing in the need for social change, Lenin instituted his "vanguard of the proletariat," designed to lead the much too passive Russian peasantry into the next level of cultural evolution. It was Lenin's vanguard that was responsible for the Bolshevik's rise to power in 1917 and the violent coup thereafter. Lenin's pro-elitist views forcibly pushed the populace toward this new communist government whether they desired it or not.
The homosexual movement today is much the same, becoming in essence the "vanguard of the electorate," advocating the forcible passage of laws without consent from anyone except the elites who implement them. The more they act, the more they divulge these true intentions. Their desire for a neo-value system necessitates the silence of critics and a ban on public dissent. Theirs is a political censorship worse than death – the silence of not only voice, but also conscience. There is no mistaking that this is what citizens can look forward to on the way toward the homosexuals' ultimate goal.
So now it stands that the public must act, not strictly from a moral vantage point, but out of a desire to save our republic. Whether one agrees or disagrees with homosexual advocacy, it is very real that the tactics of the homosexual lobby have gone far more toward eradicating the democratic ideal then any other group in our nation's history.
As Lenin's revolutionary party was dictatorial in the "need" for the radicalization of society, the homosexual movement promises the same. Without bloodshed it may be less recognizable, but it is without a doubt just as dangerous.
R. Robert McDonald
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46593
The radical homosexual movement in America today is no longer the passive, good-natured appeal to "progressive" individuals that they would have the public believe. While a nice boutique of gay-friendly media, magazines and prime-time pro-gay sitcoms may have been enough in the past, now we are seeing the culmination of a whole different side to this very powerful and well-organized movement.
To the dismay of true rights-minded individuals, while hijacking the democratic verbiage like personal freedom and civil rights, the homosexual movement has revealed its true nature as the forerunner to a cultural takeover. As we watch them tack toward a more Machiavellian approach to politics, society and culture, it has become obvious the radical homosexual movement has now become the "vanguard" of a broad-ranging social and political revolution.
The equivalent of the homosexual movement today was the Bolshevik Revolution of the early 1900s led by Vladimir Lenin. Believing in the need for social change, Lenin instituted his "vanguard of the proletariat," designed to lead the much too passive Russian peasantry into the next level of cultural evolution. It was Lenin's vanguard that was responsible for the Bolshevik's rise to power in 1917 and the violent coup thereafter. Lenin's pro-elitist views forcibly pushed the populace toward this new communist government whether they desired it or not.
The homosexual movement today is much the same, becoming in essence the "vanguard of the electorate," advocating the forcible passage of laws without consent from anyone except the elites who implement them. The more they act, the more they divulge these true intentions. Their desire for a neo-value system necessitates the silence of critics and a ban on public dissent. Theirs is a political censorship worse than death – the silence of not only voice, but also conscience. There is no mistaking that this is what citizens can look forward to on the way toward the homosexuals' ultimate goal.
So now it stands that the public must act, not strictly from a moral vantage point, but out of a desire to save our republic. Whether one agrees or disagrees with homosexual advocacy, it is very real that the tactics of the homosexual lobby have gone far more toward eradicating the democratic ideal then any other group in our nation's history.
As Lenin's revolutionary party was dictatorial in the "need" for the radicalization of society, the homosexual movement promises the same. Without bloodshed it may be less recognizable, but it is without a doubt just as dangerous.
R. Robert McDonald
www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46593
;D 
