Let's talk about Noah's sons and their descendants, and their names, and the similarities of their names to the nationalities of the world.
Last Edit: Aug 5, 2004 18:21:09 GMT -5 by chairface
I'm the backwards man, the backwards man. The backwards man, the backwards man. I can walk backwards as fast as you can. I can walk backwards as fast as you can.
First let's talk about the sources which the Hebrews ripped off in creating Noah. From Sumer and Babylon we find Ziasudra, Atrahasiz and Utnapishnim -- each from much older traditions than Noah.
I do know that crazy Identist Christians are fond of claiming that toponyms, hydronyms and ethnonyms based on "Dan" have etymologies in the Hebew tribe of Dan. This, of course, we know to be bogus history.
Noah is a biblical invention. He was supposed to be an albino born with snow white hair and milk white skin. The bible is a good read and belongs in the fiction section.
Post by BallisticaNervosa on Aug 7, 2004 6:59:02 GMT -5
Graeme said:
Noah is a biblical invention. He was supposed to be an albino born with snow white hair and milk white skin. The bible is a good read and belongs in the fiction section.
It has many interesting stories as well. It also has tons of gore!
Tonight take a good look at your hands, just before you die, and realize what we have become.
Let's talk about Noah's sons and their descendants, and their names, and the similarities of their names to the nationalities of the world.
-Noah did not want to take Loth in his boat, -So Loth and his friends migrated to the other side of the earth (because It wasn't raining there.) -Ameridinans are the direct descendants of Loth and co.
As for the relation between the name of Loth and ameriindians, Allah Ă¢alem! Keep the faith strong my brother.