|
|
Post by herrx on Dec 15, 2003 8:09:32 GMT -5
What do you want out of an IDEOLOGY? I want an ideology that would make people at least try to think with their own heads. I want peace and prosperity, but not on the account of nature, I want less hate, more knowledge. I want an ideology that strives to gather and create generations of men who demand justice. Congratulations, you are a marxist! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 15, 2003 13:00:10 GMT -5
Congratulations, you are a marxist! ;D The test told me I'm a libertarian.  |
|
|
|
Post by AWAR on Dec 15, 2003 13:03:17 GMT -5
Tsuntzu got that right ;D |
|
|
|
Post by JohnnyReb on Dec 15, 2003 16:02:32 GMT -5
I really hate government, but I also like the idea of abiding by certain rules/morals. Obviously, the people would have to enforce those things, so they would all have to be of the same mindset . With that in mind, I present Christian Libertarianism!
For it to work, one would need a relatively homogeneous (both racially and culturally) population. There is room for dissent, but since everybody is the same, the levels of dissent would be smaller. Anybody who is really wacky would get run out of town, or become a recluse. There is no real government (maybe for times of war only), because the people don't need it. They enforce their own rules, and people for the most part feel no need to break them anyways. ie, the odd child molester gets taken care of by the lynch mob.
I think the best example of this type of government would be the U.S. up until the Second World War.
|
|
|
|
Post by LuvSpune on Dec 16, 2003 2:49:48 GMT -5
as a true libertarian, I think your version is a perversion of libertarianism, becasue the lack of government (that issue I agree with you on) should not by either pressure or legislation force poeple of different views out, part of lack of governemnt is that no one is censored, no matter the views. Obviously you need laws to keep these peopel from enforcing duch things as marxism if they got into power, but they all should be allowed to exhist, its a major point of libertarianism. BTW I also agree about that child molester thing, community justice if properly tired can be a wonderful thing. It also would unintentionally reduce the amount of catholic preists  |
|
|
|
Post by JohnnyReb on Dec 16, 2003 12:50:08 GMT -5
as a true libertarian, I think your version is a perversion of libertarianism, becasue the lack of government (that issue I agree with you on) should not by either pressure or legislation force poeple of different views out, part of lack of governemnt is that no one is censored, no matter the views. Obviously you need laws to keep these peopel from enforcing duch things as marxism if they got into power, but they all should be allowed to exhist, its a major point of libertarianism. BTW I also agree about that child molester thing, community justice if properly tired can be a wonderful thing. It also would unintentionally reduce the amount of catholic preists Well, my idealogy has probably been around for longer than libertarianism has, so perhaps libertarianism is a perversion of it  I wouldn't agree with Libertarianism if everybody was allowed to stay. In a heterogenous population, that would just result in anarchy, which can never work. People would be raping and pillaging like nobody's business. In a homogeneous population, everybody is working together. There's a natural hierarchy, with no dissent. And we'd have plenty of Catholic priests, for surely you know that the instances of child molestation are higher amongst Rabbis and many Protestant ministers. |
|
