|
|
Post by stevenmelvin on Jun 17, 2005 19:57:12 GMT -5
least conscious race? or least racially conscious race? least conscious race i'd assume would be the mongoloids. since they have lower hormones, less emotional, and thus most likely have a weaker connection to their soul, than the caucasoids and negroids. we're more firey, and passionate etc. than them. as for least racially conscious race. i'd say from a global perspective it would be mongoloids again. since the majority of them are isolated from caucasoids and negroids. whereas a good deal of negroids and caucasoids live in multiracial societies. however, interestingly, when it comes to a multiracial society, the mongoloids become the most racially conscious, particularly when it comes to dealing with other races, e.g. miscegenation., 'racial purity', particularly 'ethnic purity' is very important to our paedomorphic cousins.  |
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jul 10, 2005 12:42:01 GMT -5
Actually, a study was conducted of this subject [which race is the LEAST conscious of itself--or discourages consciousness.] The LEAST conscious were the Anglo-Saxons. And the most conscious were Jews.
Anglo-Saxons were reported to be the most censorious when race or ethnicity was brought up, and the least likely to hire on the basis of shared ethnicity or race.
Jews--all the way on the other end of the spectrum [for wholly different historical reasons]--were typically the most self-conscious, and nepotistic.
|
|
Rockstar135
Full Member
Brown Goddess/Ivy Leaguer/Lover of All Things Domestic
Posts: 214
|
Post by Rockstar135 on Jul 12, 2005 23:46:14 GMT -5
I don't know how anyone can say that Mongloids are the least racially conscious. I go to school with all sorts of people, and from my experiences I would unequivocally state that they are the MOST racially conscious. I voted for caucasians.
|
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jul 12, 2005 23:51:35 GMT -5
Not race, but ethnic group, I would say latin americans are the people with less prejudices on mixing with people of other races, but in spite of that we are quite race concious.
|
|
|
|
Post by MC anunnaki on Jul 13, 2005 1:59:56 GMT -5
Caucasoids, black Africans and Mongoloid females.  |
|
|
|
Post by iberomaurusian on Jul 13, 2005 6:15:52 GMT -5
least conscious race? or least racially conscious race? Read the question of the thread! |
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jul 13, 2005 6:38:30 GMT -5
South Americans the "least" racially conscious???
What a laugh!
I've never felt such open and institutionalized racism until I traveled to South America. In Europe, there are relatively small non-white communities. So tensions sometimes flare, but it's small (and it's definitely not state-backed). In the United States, they bend over backward to institute quotas and to make amends for their past dealings with slavery. In South America, to the contrary, you'll find the most blatant and unapologetic racism on Earth. In Peru, for instance, I knew a bouncer at a club whose sole job was to keep Indians out. [The problem? --Peru is, like, 97% Indian.] Also, they have to pay for school. To be able to afford it, you have to have a job that requires a college-education. To get a college education, you need to have gone to school--something impossible if you don't have the initial money. [This system, it was explained to me by a Peruvian, was designed to lock Indians out and ensure the dominance of the tiny white Spanish population.]
Institutionalized racism like that is unheard of in Europe and the United States--yet it's the rule in South America.
I was absolutely embarrassed when South Americans behaved sycophantically when they saw my wife's blue eyes.
I'll never go back there again: It was just so disgusting.
P.S.--And before you attack the United States, be honest: Oprah Winfrey--a black woman--is a billionaire. Colin Powell and Condaleeza Rice--two blacks--acted as secretaries of state. Has anyone EVER seen a South American Indian billionaire? Or an Indian with any political power? . . . That shows you how much is against them in their societies. So . . .um . . . South America non-racist??? --Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha
In the US, you can live your whole life without noticing you have blue eyes. In Peru or Colombia or any of those countries, if you have blue eyes, you're treated like a god.
They're HYPER-conscious about race--something I had never seen in quite that fashion before. [Only caste-culture Hindus come close in thise hyper-consciousness about skin-color, social connotations of complexion and sycophancy in the presence of fair skin.]
|
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jul 13, 2005 11:40:26 GMT -5
I have lost the will the read any of you long, emotional rants.
Just, try to read again why I wrote, before being driven frenzy.
I said that we are quite racially conscious, but that in spite of that we have less prejudices on mixing with people of other races, than in other cultures.
I find our tendency for miscegenation curious/funny because do we live in a quite racially concious society.
So, I kinda agree with you
Do you understand what i tried to say now?
Btw, dont forget Latin America is a big big place, we are not an homogenous group from Mexico to Tierra del Fuego.
And you certainly wouldnt be stalked in Argentina, Uruguay or Brazil for being blue eyed.
Btw, President Toledo of Peru is an indian, the president of Ecuador too, do you think Chavez is white? hell, no.
Call me again when you have an african american president.
In those countries the economic power is indeed controlled by the white minority, but amerindians, mestizos , poor people do have political power, just because of their sheer numbers and being the majority.
|
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jul 13, 2005 13:13:21 GMT -5
Educate Me,
I was just watching an Argentine movie. In it, one of the characters talks about leaving Argentina as a boy and going back to Italy. He said that he had had blond hair as a little kid, adding, "And you know what blond hair means in a country like ours."
So it's not just the Indian countries of South America. Even in white Chile and Argentina, the people are ruthlessly racist--hence their cozy relationship with the Nazis after World War II.
These are NOT cuddly, non-racist people. These are the descendants of the Conquistadors: Not a bunch of soft lovey-dovey types.
So, yes, they might have "bred" with natives. But so did slave-masters in the United States. Raping a slave isn't exactly a sign of affection.
. . . But moving on: I can't believe that people have voted the Asians as the least racist. Anyone who knows of Japan's ruthless racism, or the Chinese attitude toward South-East Asians (whom they regard as veritably sub-human) would laugh seeing the votes in here.
Hey! Anyone ever heard of a little thing called The Great Wall of China? --It's the biggest monument to xenophobia in world history. Asians non-racist? --Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha
|
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jul 13, 2005 19:23:44 GMT -5
I someone said that to me I wouldnt know what he means, sincerely.
What movie was that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jul 17, 2005 21:04:32 GMT -5
The film--whose name I forget--had girls in it, selling laundry soap on the streets and wearing T-shirts with the corporate logo. It was a really great film--that had nothing to do with race. It just had that one line in it about "blond hair meaning a lot in Argentina".
Maybe someone will be able to come up with the title.
P.S.--It had another element in the plot: The main character (a girl) had the same name as another woman in another part of the country. In fact, it was a relatively common name and the director has a part where all these different women [with the same name] meet.
Can someone help us with title?
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jul 17, 2005 21:41:53 GMT -5
The Japanese where also extremely racist durign WW2,as they thought the Chinese where inferior sub-humans,and carried out programs to eradicate them...But even the Chinese are guilty of racism at certain points in their long history...So no the mongoloids are exempt either at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Educate Me on Jul 17, 2005 22:16:15 GMT -5
Oh, I think I remember the film, Silvia Prieto?
Anyway, I barely remember the film
|
|
|
|
Post by Drooperdoo on Jul 18, 2005 8:17:55 GMT -5
Crimson Guard,
The Japanese are still seen as one of the world's most xenophobic peoples. Certain groups are complaining at the UN. A Jewish fellow [God, why must it always be Jews???] has recently moved to Japan to stir up trouble. He's complaining that Japan's immigration prohibitions are against more modern Western trends. According to the article I read, Japan has a population that is ridiculously homogenous. 99% of people in the census are registered as ethnic Japanese, with a mere 1% population of foreigners. [That 1% is made up of ethnic Koreans and Chinese.]
P.S.--China, by the way, is--and has always been--contemptuous of its Southeast Asian neighbors. As Asiatics who gradate into Austroloids, they are seen as primitives, sub-literates and racially-inferior riffraff. [Sadly, China (one of the world's great cultures) may have a leg to stand on--if one is honest. Southeast Asia routinely scores well below China, Japan and Korea on IQ tests, and is home to dozens of stoneage tribes.]
|
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Jul 18, 2005 9:49:07 GMT -5
|
|
Hi Wadadd, hi Berter, and helllllo Anunnaki 
