|
Post by Igu on Mar 17, 2005 16:40:37 GMT -5
Hey, I didn't see this post, No no, the negroid type has been replaced in the sahara by the capsian: the negroid: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/pasteur_1.jpg) Proto-Fulani: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/pasteur_2.jpg) Capsian invaders: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/proto_1.jpg) -After the desertification, They left north and south, - the tuaregs migrated south RECENTLY , thus they were white.
|
|
|
Post by mike2 on Mar 17, 2005 16:54:26 GMT -5
I can post tons of black Tuaregs, it doesn't make a bit of a difference. my challenge to him(Igu) was to prove that 'white Tuaregs' moved south. There's no such thing as 'Sudanids' , the majority of Tuareg DNA is sub-Saharan in origin. The point I'm making is that in the case of the Tuaregs, there wasn't an imposition of white over black. TopDog, you might as well just come out and say there's no such thing as race because there is no way I or anyone else on this board can argue with a person who does not believe in Congoids, Sudanids, or the simple fact that Tuaregs have Berber blood. It's like an evolutionist trying to argue with a creationist. We live in two different worlds. This is what I think. You and your friends with ties to Afrocentric ideas don't want to believe in physical anthropology. You resort to lashing against people like Coon by saying all of these anthropologists are outdated. You push your diversity-in-Africans-is-purely-environmental mumbo jumbo because you just can't stand the thought of a widespread white race in Africa superimposing itself on an indigenous black one. You don't want to see Caucasoid influences in Ethiopians, Somalis, or Tuaregs and you do not want to believe in a Caucasoid origin for Egyptians because such influences and substantiated theories you are so inclined to refute do not fit into your view of a racially united black Africa. Almost all of the ideas you refute are not outdated. They are just in need of revision. And thanks to people like Dienekes and modern geneticists, we are getting the proof we need to confirm older, substantiated beliefs that have come under attack in the heat of non-white political agendas that have their roots in backlash against Eurocentrism. I don't mean to villify you. But I just get sick of people trying to overturn contemporary scholarship because the people and ideas behind it are too complex and old and therefore certainly outdated! Pfffft. No reason to change a good thing, I say.
|
|
|
Post by topdog on Mar 18, 2005 4:07:06 GMT -5
Hey, I didn't see this post, No no, the negroid type has been replaced in the sahara by the capsian: the negroid: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/pasteur_1.jpg) Proto-Fulani: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/pasteur_2.jpg) Capsian invaders: ![](http://www.futura-sciences.com/comprendre/d/images/proto_1.jpg) -After the desertification, They left north and south, - the tuaregs migrated south RECENTLY , thus they were white. Capsian doesn't refer to a racial type, it refers to a tool industry. That picture you posted doesn't look like a 'white' person at all. The genetic evidence from Cavalli-Sforza says that Bejas and Tuaregs split from a common ancestor 5000 years ago, so where are your original 'white' Tuaregs? There is no evidence that Tuaregs descend from 'Capsians'.
|
|