|
|
Post by Human on Jan 3, 2005 17:38:21 GMT -5
a. it looks like in mult culti societies the blacks
are the peripheral groups and tend to have
the highest criminal rates... being marginal,
they get criminal.
b. among whites, however, the psycopath
caracter comes out fully. the psychiatry literature
reports higher frequencies of schizophrenic, loner,
caucasoid serial killers in the US (take, for instance,
the Unabomber, who was, I guess, of Polish
origin). bearded, careless about themselves,
mentally sick caucasoids can cause huge harm...
It is hard to pick a black or a yellow fellow when
thinking of a meticulous, cold, bloody serial killer.
The majority of them are caucasoid and this
fact is reported in the psychiatric literature.
Is it because whites are somewhat more aggressive?
Neanderthal ferouciousness ?
It looks like also the most risky taking elements,
the ones who discovers new worlds, who climb
the highest buildings (like that French I dont recall
his name), the 'explorers', in brief, tend to be
caucasoids (never heard of a black or a yellow
'explorer').
what do you think? ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Italian Stallion on Jan 3, 2005 17:59:39 GMT -5
b. among whites, however, the psycopath caracter comes out fully. the psychiatry literature reports higher frequencies of schizophrenic, loner, caucasoid serial killers in the US (take, for instance, the Unabomber, who was, I guess, of Polish origin). bearded, careless about themselves, mentally sick caucasoids can cause huge harm... It is hard to pick a black or a yellow fellow when thinking of a meticulous, cold, bloody serial killer. The majority of them are caucasoid and this fact is reported in the psychiatric literature. I think people in the west are ignorant about what really goes on in the rest of the world. I believe that since you live in a western nation with western Media, they are going to report matters which are relatively local. For instance, Geoffery Dalmer was big news in North America, yet I can bet he wasn't big news in Thailand... yet the Thai's probably have serial killers of their own, that people in the West couldn't care less about seeing on their nightly news. Its all a matter of what we are exposed to. Also, in the West, we probably have more Psycholgists per capita looking to identify every new possible type of problem a person can have....ADD, phobics, loners, Autism etc etc etc probably go unnoticed/ undiagnosed in Underdeveloped nations. |
|
|
|
Post by Melnorme on Jan 3, 2005 18:32:36 GMT -5
a. it looks like in mult culti societies the blacks are the peripheral groups and tend to have the highest criminal rates... being marginal, they get criminal. b. among whites, however, the psycopath caracter comes out fully. the psychiatry literature reports higher frequencies of schizophrenic, loner, caucasoid serial killers in the US (take, for instance, the Unabomber, who was, I guess, of Polish origin). bearded, careless about themselves, mentally sick caucasoids can cause huge harm... It is hard to pick a black or a yellow fellow when thinking of a meticulous, cold, bloody serial killer. The majority of them are caucasoid and this fact is reported in the psychiatric literature. Is it because whites are somewhat more aggressive? Neanderthal ferouciousness ? It looks like also the most risky taking elements, the ones who discovers new worlds, who climb the highest buildings (like that French I dont recall his name), the 'explorers', in brief, tend to be caucasoids (never heard of a black or a yellow 'explorer'). what do you think? ? I think the bit about serial killers might just be a stereotype/urban legend. BTW, Human, could you please not put a space between every line? It's not easy on the eyes. |
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 3, 2005 18:48:18 GMT -5
you can check at the psychiatric literature on the net. many Russians and other caucasoids have had serial killers... I dont remember Japanese psycopath serial killers, to be true. There are, of course. But at a much lower rate. Check the text below. At one time, they say: www.angelfire.com/weird/flash333/killers/profile.htmlThe “typical” profile of a serial killer is a Caucasian male between the ages of 18 and 32 Serial Killer Profile Serial killers are composed of all types and forms of people. They can be males or females, young or old, single killers or pairs of killers, and of any ethnic background. A serial killer can be from any walk of life. He or she could be your next door neighbor or even a long time friend. History has proven that a serial killer could be anyone. Through the exploits of past serial killers we have been able to learn a lot about this breed of killer. We have been able to look at their background and view their childhood life in order to better understand what drives them to kill. The Behavior Science Unit of the FBI has used the information collected to create a standard profile of serial killers. This tool is able to help the FBI and other police agencies in identifying possible serial killers. The “typical” profile of a serial killer is a Caucasian male between the ages of 18 and 32. There will be evidence of child abuse in his background. In his background, he will show signs of the McDonald triad which are bedwetting beyond the age of ten, abuse to animals, and a history of arson. The serial killer will operate by himself. This set profile does not encompass every serial killer. There have been many serial killers that do not fit this profile. For this reason alone, the standard or set profile of a serial killer is used to aid an investigation, not run it. Wayne Williams, known for the “Atlanta Child Murders,” is one of many killers who defy the “standard” profile for a serial killer. Williams is an African American, not Caucasian. Cleophus Prince, Jr, known as the “Clairemont Killer,” is also African American. These men are only two examples of differences in ethnic background, there are many more. The differences do not necessarily have to be between African American and Caucasian. Italians, Hispanics, and Asians have also been serial killers. One of the problems with using the term Caucasian is that there is a thin line between someone who is Caucasian and, as an example, Italian. A person of Italian decent may be considered a Caucasian by one person and not by another. The term is a matter of relativity in regards to each person who hears it. The majority of serial killers are males, however there are female serial killers. Genene Jones was a licensed nurse who would kill babies admitted into the intensive care unit where she worked. Aileen Wuornos went on a killing spree of white males with a .22 caliber gun. Amy Archer-Gilligan would poison the patients who stayed at her home for the elderly. She even poisoned her husband. These three women do not fit the “standard” profile, yet they are all serial killers. The standard age of a serial killer is 18 – 32. Joseph Ball was around the age of forty when he committed his acts of murder. Ball would choose his victims from the wait staff at his restaurant in Texas. He would then dismember them and feed them to the alligators that he kept behind the restaurant. Ray and Faye Copeland are another example of serial killers who greatly exceeded the age limit. Faye was sixty-nine and Ray was seventy-five at the time of their killings. Ray and Faye would pick their victims from the laborers who worked on their farm in Missouri. They kept a log of all the “disappearing” laborers and Faye made a quilt out of their clothing. It has been said that Ted Bundy killed for the first time when he was just a teenager. Arthur Shawcross and Ed Gein also exceeded the age of thirty-two during their killings. The normal age of a serial killer may be from 18 – 32, yet there have been serial killers that once again defy that standard. According to the standard profile a serial killer operates alone. However, there have been many examples of serial killers who worked in pairs or even groups. One of the most notorious killer pairs was Kenneth Bianchi and Angelo Buono, “The Hillside Stranglers.” These two cousins caused a reign of terror throughout Southern California from 1977 to 1979. Gwendolyn Gail Graham and Catherine Wood were two lesbian lovers who killed elderly patients at the nursing home where they were employed. The end of the murders came when, in a fit of rage and jealously Wood told her and Graham’s secret to her former husband. Dr. Morris Bolber and his two cousins killed in Philadelphia in order to receive portions of life insurance plans. The three men would seduce a woman and then convince her to give them a cut of the insurance policy if they killed her husband. In this instance there were always at least three people involved in the killings, making it a group effort. Evidence of abuse, as a child, is believed to be a factor in the background of most serial killers. However, there are the exceptions. Jeffrey Dahmer is an excellent example of an exception. There has been no evidence of child abuse in his background. Dahmer’s parents treated him very well. Kenneth Bianchi and David Berkowitz also showed no signs of abuse as a child. The McDonald triad is also usually present in the serial killer’s background. The serial killer will usually have done at least one of the three items involved in the triad, whether it is bedwetting beyond the age of ten, arson, or torture to animals. The standard profile compiled by the FBI is pretty accurate. However, there will always be the exceptions to rules. This is no different when it comes to serial killers. There will never be a strict guideline that can be followed to determine whether or not someone will be a serial killer. There will always be the “what ifs” and “maybes” that will change the rules. This is why the FBI and police agencies investigating a serial killer must always keep an open mind. If the do not, then they risk the chance of leaving out the killer just because he or she does not fit their profile. A standard profile is an excellent tool to be used as an aid in an investigation, but should never be set in stone. An investigator must always be flexible so that the Jeffrey Dahmers and “The Lonely Hearts Killers” of the world do not get away with their crimes. Read this brief text: |
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 3, 2005 18:51:17 GMT -5
1st text I found on the net...
simpleton, but still it tells about the typical
psycopath profile... caucasoid, no doubt!
|
|
|
|
Post by IfTheLightTakesUs on Jan 3, 2005 18:51:43 GMT -5
There is always the stereotype of the cold, calculating, German terrorist hijacking a plane and what not (lately we have been getting in on it too)
caucasians committing more premeditated murders doesn't show them to be more fierce, but I think the opposite. Perhaps a higher testosterone level in blacks leads them to more "explosive" irrational behavior?
Also, I have noticed that blacks do seem to scare a whole lot easier...I find it kind of odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Italian Stallion on Jan 3, 2005 19:26:31 GMT -5
1st text I found on the net... simpleton, but still it tells about the typical psycopath profile... caucasoid, no doubt! Uhm... you're missing my earlier point entirely. BTW, most serial killers in Western nations are causcasian, because... duh, the majority of their populations are caucasian. Also, you hear of these sensational stories once a decade. 3 or 4 ... or even 100 Geoffery Dalmers within a population of 300million in USA doesn't really prove a point. Unless you are assuming that the hundreds of unexplained murders a year are due to Serial Killers..... which is not the case. Besides, I highly doubt you can read Japanese. Also, go into the China town area of your City and see how many chinese , japanese, korean comics there are featuring evil killers that go around Raping and killing women. This theme was wildly popular back in the 80's and 90's in Japan. Sounds like that kind of psychotic behavior is pretty common there too. |
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 4, 2005 10:28:55 GMT -5
i do guess so that maybe caucasoids in
general may have a somewhat risk-takingness
higher than negroids... negroids seem to get
afraid easier...
as a reverse of the coin, the most harming
criminal elements may reside in the caucasoid
population....
|
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Jan 4, 2005 15:03:48 GMT -5
There are also dozens of high-kill-rate serial killers at large in Central and South America.
P.S. Human: stop double-spacing your posts to make them look essay-like. It doesn't make them have either a point or substance. Go see a psychotherapist about having a Neanderthal-complex! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by Human on Jan 4, 2005 15:25:42 GMT -5
hi Emperor and King! I didnt mean there were such
a lunatics only in the US, sure not. Latin America
is by a much greater margin worse. This place here
is a hell, believe me (Im honest). But I could point
to you (at least here in Brasil) a majority of caucasoids
amongst the most terrible serial killers weve had. Thanks for your advice on my health. I didnt know
free speculation could lead to such conclusions... Just
to make sure Im only speculating. Im not anything like
a rigid firm believer on what I said. It was just like: and
if all this come about to be true ? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Slick on Jan 5, 2005 6:43:39 GMT -5
There are also dozens of high-kill-rate serial killers at large in Central and South America. Poverty, unfair and uneven wealth distribution breeds crime and social unrest and instability. |
|
