|
Post by labi on Dec 24, 2005 16:11:43 GMT -5
dude, your posting mainly ottoman era maps in which Albanians had a fair bit of control of Kosovo thanks to the preferential treatment they got from the ottomans. I think i maybe a little mis-understood in that i do believe that there have always been Albanians in Kosovo, the way they became a majority is the only part that concerns me. Also i know of balkan mentality & of Albanians, in particular Kosovo Albanians, in fact at one stage they made up around 70% of my friends so i know them very well. My interest in Kosovo also spans from the fact that my fathers family originated from their & had to migrate north due to ottoman issues around 350-400 years back, well thats as far back as he can trace his family tree. And dude it is also well known about post WW2 migrations of Albanians to Kosovo to join the already present Albanian population there to seek a better life in the more prosperous Yugoslavia. I'm sure there were a few cases in which the went in opposing directions but you can't deny that a very large amount settled to Kosovo to join there bretheren in post WW2. I may also be coming off as a little anti-Albanian, but i'm not really, i actually believe Serbs & Kosovo Albs share alot of genetics given they look alike (Dinaric looking). This to me shows shared genetics rather than possible enviromental effects causing Dinaricism. what do you mean ottoman maps? fine show me a map made by russians. i even showed you a serbian map. also check the yugoslav census of 1921. albs made 2/3 of according to serbian organised census. so how are you going to say albs became the majority in titos time. there was not an outflow of albs from albania to kosovo in titos times, at least not anything major, the borders were sealed and border guards shot anyone trying to escape. even after ww2 according to yugo census albs made around 62-64% of population. it was the outflow of serbs from kosovo to better economically regions to the north followed by high birth rates of kosovo albs that kosovo became more and more albanian.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 24, 2005 16:23:24 GMT -5
Anywayz all that is the past & now we must focus on the future... I just hope the both parties in the Kosovo final solution can compromise. What do you think is the best solution for current day Kosovo? thats a good question. the best solution would be for kosovo to become its own republic that cannot secede but it is to be own republic(with its own soccer team BTW). sorry i want to see albs have their own teams in sports. ;D and ofcourse serbia stops the propoganda and stereotypes they made of albanians for a century now. if albanians are to be part of SiCG they have to be literally equal citizens. this is the best solution because i hate to see further cold relations between serbs and albs. like you said were very alike. its kind of sad we cant be friends with people so similar to us. and albs to have their own republic is very important. if albs are ever going to be a visible people in europe kosovo needs to be controled by albs. so its very important for us to have strong control of kosovo. and doing that without seceding is only through a republic. however most serbians dont accept albanians as equals and are very racist in attitudes. look at all the trashy muslim-terrorist articles made tiresly by serbian writers. most kosovo albs hate serbians equally. basically deep wounds have been inflicted and im not sure if they can healed.
|
|
|
Post by australoserbicus on Dec 24, 2005 17:25:10 GMT -5
I kinda corrected myself regarding the maps being ottoman in a previous post, i still thought i saw one in there but dont have the time at the moment to re-check. However i did see alot of German language in those maps & if they are of German source then they are likley to be biased against Serbs. The Cvijic map seemed a little unclear & coudnt read it very well.
As for the census of 1921, i am unsure of that one & will need to check it out, but i think you could be right. As for the Tito issue i meant to say that his policies helped in the Albanians becoming an 'overwhelming' majority in the province. Serbs did flee the region & it wasn't only better econimic prospects that drove them.
I totally agree with your last post, it would be a compromise by both parties as no one gets it entirely their own way. It's true the about the racism part also, i have seen alot on the frontlines of both peoples (being a Serb growing up with many Albanians friends). They are deep wounds & i think with a better education system in place & good economy i'm sure can help it heal the old wounds. But in order to get that we must work together.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 24, 2005 21:07:44 GMT -5
here is another version of cvijic map....  he reduces albs everywhere. even in south albania he greek ethnic line right next to my parents villages which i know is not true. he creates an ethnicty called albanised serbs which inhabit most of north albania mized with real albanians(whatever the real one are  ). when i meant albs need strong of kosovo i didnt mean rule with an iron fist or something.lol kosovo is fertile area(the most fertile than any inhabited by albs) and rich in minerals. with self-control they would become the center of albanian culture in music, economy, movies, sports you name it. their markets opening would greatly help isolated north albania which is the poorest part of albania. albania itself would be no more than a country with light industry and tourism, kosovo is the only place where albanians can rise and develop further. for the 1921 census just type yugoslav 1921 census kosovo, it should be somewhere in google. and yes i agree titos policies did help albanians become more dominant in kosovo.
|
|
byz
Full Member
 
rodostamo na ginesai
Posts: 171
|
Post by byz on Dec 25, 2005 19:43:16 GMT -5
It's interesting to see how politics affects cartography - I'm sure that the distribution of Albanians is wider than this map is making out.
|
|
|
Post by australoserbicus on Dec 26, 2005 5:06:31 GMT -5
It's interesting to see how politics affects cartography - I'm sure that the distribution of Albanians is wider than this map is making out. Well that depends on the period the map is refering too. If based in more recent times than yeah, probably wider. Notice the Albanised Serb areas he creates which Labi mentions in a previous post, are pretty much where the highest concetration of dinarid Albanian folk live.
|
|
|
Post by Celetron on Dec 27, 2005 7:14:16 GMT -5
I find the map actually very fair...and objective, regarding the distribution of the peoples. Byz look at Peloponnese and Euböa...the map shows very clearly the arvanites of there, northern Greece is pred. slavic. I find the map pretty fair and truth representing. Now regarding the kosovar albanians calling serbs....thats a totally different issue, dont know what the serb guy thought of them. We must distinguish....the peoples distribution is correctly shown in my opinion. Also is Greek peopled Northern Epirus not too big, only near the borders. Koritsa is fully albanian Argirokastron and Agioi Saranta mixed. I dont find the map biased here.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 27, 2005 10:38:37 GMT -5
Well that depends on the period the map is refering too. If based in more recent times than yeah, probably wider. Notice the Albanised Serb areas he creates which Labi mentions in a previous post, are pretty much where the highest concetration of dinarid Albanian folk live. this is a joke right? be serious man. serbs in kosovo were not that numerous in 1918. even the yugoslav 1921 census map doest agree. serbs in cvijic map are incresed twofold. cvijic is just like arkan, racist pig. now the fact that serbian public supports such individuals to lead them and embrace their ideas is why the "lets get along crap" will not work. albanians dont owe their dinarism to serbs. albania has a frequency of dinarids equal to serbia. now for some things for you to think about. you think cvijiv visited every part of albania? every region? everyone? how did he learn who is albanised serbs and whose not? how can he distinguish? cvijic work is scientific justification for greater serbian politics. in every forum, there serbs claiming albanian cities as far as durres, talking about "albanised" serbs. you didnt get along with your own borthers, i dont think serbs are capable of geting along with kosovo albanians.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 27, 2005 10:52:13 GMT -5
i just relized cvijic made two maps. one for 1912 and one for 1918. this is the 1912......  zoomed version www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/balkan_serbs_1914.jpgcvijic creates serbian presence in south albania and central albania. this guy is insane! he also reduces gheg albanian presence considerably. lets look at a bulgarian version of macedonia. www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/balkan_bulgarian_1914.jpgthe bulgar map shows albanian presence in macedonia much thicker and more pockets included unlike the racist cvijic map. in his two maps cvijic erases albanian presence in territory montengro gained after 1913 and creates a serbian minority east of the city of shkodra in the new albanian state, which was not included in his previous map. i aslo like how cvijic puts a huge serbian presence in the shar mountains when 20 years later in 1938 the other greater serbian doctor talks about how the albanian hold on shar mountains must be cleansed in order to properly colonise kosovo with serbs and fulfill the serbian final solution.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 27, 2005 11:13:58 GMT -5
I find the map actually very fair...and objective, regarding the distribution of the peoples. Byz look at Peloponnese and Euböa...the map shows very clearly the arvanites of there, northern Greece is pred. slavic. I find the map pretty fair and truth representing. Now regarding the kosovar albanians calling serbs....thats a totally different issue, dont know what the serb guy thought of them. We must distinguish....the peoples distribution is correctly shown in my opinion. Also is Greek peopled Northern Epirus not too big, only near the borders. Koritsa is fully albanian Argirokastron and Agioi Saranta mixed. I dont find the map biased here. cvijic maps dont change the greek-ethnic line. however he bases this line either through guessing or on somebodies else work. either way the line is not correct, because there are no greek villages north of gjirokaster. gjirokaster the city itself never had a greek quater until communist days. west of gjirokaster the map is ok. now east, east of aos river the map is trash. there are no greeks in leskovik and its district. lets look at cvijic map zoomed in again...... www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/historical/balkan_serbs_1914.jpgsee leskovik? labeled as greek but according to first hand evidence in 1904......... cvijic map again shrinks albanians. the alb-greek border is perfect north of vjose river. with 2 greek villages in permet district and one alb village in ionnina district. other than that the border is flawless. the area in leskovik is not greek like in cvijic map. cvijic alos makes the area of lunxheri as greko-alb mixed when in reality lunxheri is all albanian. lunxheri lies just north of gjirokaster. other than that i dont see any other problems with the greek-alb line, although i admit i dont know much about greek epirus so i wouldnt know if cvijic is favoring albs or greeks in that part of the region.
|
|
|
Post by Liquid Len on Dec 27, 2005 17:54:27 GMT -5
According to Albo-Illyrian studies, most Illyrian people were also Dinaric...I say thats possible but i'm not 100%. According to a German study from 1979, only four Illyrian skulls from Albania had been found and described. They had an average CI of 78,0. But to conclude from this that the Illyrians were not pred. Dinaric seems a little daring. But on the other hand, there had been much more Illyrian skulls found from former Yugoslavia, and they had a similar mesocephalic mean CI. So it looks like that at least the more Northern Illyrians were not predominantly Dinaric. Nevertheless it’s possible that there had been differences between northern and southern Illyrian tribes. To my knowledge, many Illyrian graves had been discovered in Albania in the seventies (and possibly later), but I don’t know anything about the measurements of the skulls. Perhaps this is what the Albo-Illyrian studies are referring to. (?)
|
|
|
Post by australoserbicus on Dec 27, 2005 19:38:17 GMT -5
Well that depends on the period the map is refering too. If based in more recent times than yeah, probably wider. Notice the Albanised Serb areas he creates which Labi mentions in a previous post, are pretty much where the highest concetration of dinarid Albanian folk live. this is a joke right? be serious man. serbs in kosovo were not that numerous in 1918. even the yugoslav 1921 census map doest agree. serbs in cvijic map are incresed twofold. cvijic is just like arkan, racist pig. now the fact that serbian public supports such individuals to lead them and embrace their ideas is why the "lets get along crap" will not work. albanians dont owe their dinarism to serbs. albania has a frequency of dinarids equal to serbia. now for some things for you to think about. you think cvijiv visited every part of albania? every region? everyone? how did he learn who is albanised serbs and whose not? how can he distinguish? cvijic work is scientific justification for greater serbian politics. in every forum, there serbs claiming albanian cities as far as durres, talking about "albanised" serbs. you didnt get along with your own borthers, i dont think serbs are capable of geting along with kosovo albanians. If that map was from 1918 then it appears he did overestimate the Serb population in Kosovo. Him being a racist, probably to a degree. As for the Dinaricsm part, i never stated Albs owed this to Serbs, to me both being equally Dinaric shows the a very possible common ancestry, to which we both owe. On Cvijic classifying "Albanised Serbs", The map seems to show that those he calls "Albanised Serbs" in are pred. Dinaric regions. So, it appears by his logic anyway, any Alb that looked Dinaric was pooled into the "Albanised Serb" category. Now he may have thought they owed Dinaricism to Serbs but i don't, as i stated above.
|
|
|
Post by labi on Dec 27, 2005 21:02:26 GMT -5
If that map was from 1918 then it appears he did overestimate the Serb population in Kosovo. Him being a racist, probably to a degree. As for the Dinaricsm part, i never stated Albs owed this to Serbs, to me both being equally Dinaric shows the a very possible common ancestry, to which we both owe. On Cvijic classifying "Albanised Serbs", The map seems to show that those he calls "Albanised Serbs" in are pred. Dinaric regions. So, it appears by his logic anyway, any Alb that looked Dinaric was pooled into the "Albanised Serb" category. Now he may have thought they owed Dinaricism to Serbs but i don't, as i stated above. its the 1912 map that shows more serbs. in 1918 some alb areas are shranked but so are imaginary serbian presence in central albania(shkumbin valley), and in 1918 more are labeled as albanised serbs. dinarids both in serbia and albania are common in the more mountainous regions also the most tribal areas, the parts that were more loosely held by ottoman control.
|
|
|
Post by Celetron on Dec 28, 2005 7:17:47 GMT -5
Labi dont forget he cannot refer to every little village...so he is always marking a particular region...and Leskovik is marked as greek albanian mixed....the same goes then also for the region of argirokastron...the marked region is greek alb mixed...now..the more such a map shows a bigger region the more it gets undetailled....I find the big, detailed map still very good and worthly. Yet I dont know any better alternative. Do you?
|
|
|
Post by labi on Jan 25, 2006 15:41:59 GMT -5
An ancient southern Greek writer actually made a comment (more like an insult, lol) about the Greek tribe of the Chaones from Epirus - he said something to the effect that they had heads as round as mushrooms, and that because of this they didn't need to wear hats to protect themselves from the sun. I don't really believe that the ancient southern Greeks were of lighter pigmentation (but there must have been, and still is, a fair amount of regional variation)- but I do think the Dorians would have looked fairly Alpine. Ancient sources (wish I could remember which ones) seem to say that the Athenians were fairly dark in appearance, and Greek art seems to corroborate this (mind you, the Athenians were said to be the least Hellenised people on the mainland, which I reckon is pretty ironic). Labi - may I ask which part of Southern Albania your family is from? byz, regarding the head shape thing. i dont know wether he meant alpine or the type of head with an oversized frontal cortex. a trait still present among some south albies. like the writer from gjirokaster ismail kadare. here is one of my distant relatives(i saw this while going through my parents old photos)....... 
|
|