comparing japan and britain

[gelaye]

Britain - Indigenous hunter gatherer pop, replaced by celts and iberians
Japan - Indigenous hunter gatherer pop, replaced by Ainu/malay-polys

Britain - waves of immigration from Denmark peninsula, Germany etc Saxon immigration - pushes celts to extremities or interbreeds with them
Japan - waves of immigration from Korean peninsula from china too etc, pushes ainu far northern extremity, and interbreeds

So would you say that Japan and Britian both have populations that are equally as different from their mainland counterparts? It is possible to find a Japanese person that 'looks' japanese and not chinese or korean. is this possible in England due to the same history of immigration that has gone on there?

[Miguel Antunes]

Hum...aren´t the indigenous peoples in Britain Iberians...wich moved there after the Ice Age ended..meaning nobody was there?

And I thought that the Ainu..or the Jomon were the native type in Japan too...

[aroundtheworld]

Even the island countries are shaped very similarly.

[gelaye]

and as mentioned in a previous post, their racial stock act similarly lol

[Hairless]

The Japanese were invaders of Japan, not the original inhabitants

[yigal]

um khangard thats the point, same with brits

[Hairless]

yigal said:

um khangard thats the point, same with brits

Um Yigal.... It says in the original post that Japanese were "replaced by Ainu" -- so if that is the point it should be stated correctly.

[yigal]

khangard said:

yigal said:

um khangard thats the point, same with brits

Um Yigal.... It says in the original post that Japanese were "replaced by Ainu" -- so if that is the point it should be stated correctly.

no u just cant read

it says the origional (malay-austral) japanese where replaced by ainu, and then ainu replaced by oeioke from korean peninsula and china

in britain it was Preceltii replaced by celtii replaced by Alemans

[Hairless]

yigal said:

khangard said:

Um Yigal.... It says in the original post that Japanese were "replaced by Ainu" -- so if that is the point it should be stated correctly.

no u just cant read

it says the origional (malay-austral) japanese where replaced by ainu, and then ainu replaced by oeioke from korean peninsula and china

in britain it was Preceltii replaced by celtii replaced by Alemans

Sorry. I speak English.

[yigal]

in britain it went Precelts>Britons(celts)>Saxon/Angles(aleman)

in Japan it went AustraloMalays>Ainu> Classic Mongoloids