|
Post by eufrenio on Jun 29, 2004 18:09:57 GMT -5
er right. Us women are taking over the world..... & you're being "ripped off and denied your rights" how?? which "rights" are you talking about?? ;D Have you any idea how hilarious that sounds Do you mean that I am starting to sound like a Feminist in reverse? How about quotas for women, divorce courts, etc. do you think they are fair to men?
|
|
|
Post by Aria88 on Jun 29, 2004 22:09:46 GMT -5
Manly rights! The rights of men. Manly men. When I become Dictator, folks will watch reruns of The Man Show and say, "I can't believe people watched feminist crap like this!" ;D
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jun 30, 2004 9:07:30 GMT -5
er right. Us women are taking over the world..... & you're being "ripped off and denied your rights" how?? which "rights" are you talking about?? ;D Have you any idea how hilarious that sounds Please read the following essay by Angry Harry (a British activist in the Men´s Rights Movement): "What a Piece of Shit is Man" www.angryharry.com/esWhataPieceofShitisMan.htmFurther essays to see where he´s coming from: www.angryharry.com/about.htm
|
|
Katea
New Member
Posts: 47
|
Post by Katea on Jun 30, 2004 12:47:57 GMT -5
Do you mean that I am starting to sound like a Feminist in reverse? How about quotas for women, divorce courts, etc. do you think they are fair to men? Ok, thanks for the clarification, - I understand where you're coming from. This is an extremely complicated issue. Quotas, divorce allocations - in the past many women have been victimised by men (which can severely traumatise a person) & many of these new laws etc. are to prevent that from happening. Unfortunately, now many women who have not been traumatised, use these laws etc. in a dishonest fashion. I believe this is very very wrong, & diminishes what these laws are really for - protecting genuine victims. Its gets men angry, and it also gets the genuine victims angry. However, without the divorce etc. laws, the genuine victims would continue to be victimised by men - which is not good. As I said,...its an extremely complicated situation.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Jun 30, 2004 15:32:24 GMT -5
Ok, thanks for the clarification, - I understand where you're coming from. This is an extremely complicated issue. Quotas, divorce allocations - in the past many women have been victimised by men (which can severely traumatise a person) & many of these new laws etc. are to prevent that from happening. Unfortunately, now many women who have not been traumatised, use these laws etc. in a dishonest fashion. I believe this is very very wrong, & diminishes what these laws are really for - protecting genuine victims. Its gets men angry, and it also gets the genuine victims angry. However, without the divorce etc. laws, the genuine victims would continue to be victimised by men - which is not good. As I said,...its an extremely complicated situation. Either men and women are equal before the law or they are not. It´s simple enough. I am of course against quotas of any kind. But I am afraid we´ve strayed far from the main topic!
|
|
Katea
New Member
Posts: 47
|
Post by Katea on Jun 30, 2004 16:12:28 GMT -5
Either men and women are equal before the law or they are not. It´s simple enough. I am of course against quotas of any kind. But I am afraid we´ve strayed far from the main topic! I agree (with all of the above).
|
|