|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 14, 2006 20:06:41 GMT -5
Is it really that inportant to continually stress and proclaim there blackness? I know that some of egyptians look like caucasoid and arab but blacks like to stress on there blackness while on the other hand stating that a true whites looks only like Paul Bettany or people from the Northern Europe. Isn\'t that hypocritical to say the least?
|
|
|
|
Post by asdf on Jan 14, 2006 20:14:42 GMT -5
Why do people think Northern Europe is best exemplified by Paul Bettany?
|
|
|
|
Post by olympian on Jan 14, 2006 21:43:04 GMT -5
both sides are obviously stupid
|
|
Siafu X
Full Member
Is man one of God's blunders or is God one of man's blunders
Posts: 206
|
Post by Siafu X on Jan 15, 2006 2:20:04 GMT -5
both sides are obviously stupid agreed |
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 4:50:06 GMT -5
Blacks don't obsess about Egypt's blackness, but rather its the so-called "Meds" here that obsess about Egypt being a Mediterranean civilization, which it is not. Stating that Egypt had what we would call black people today is not obsessing. Why do Meds obsess over Egypt's alleged "Med" origins while stating on the other hand that people like Idi Amin and Wesley Snipes are the only true Negroids? Why do Meds state that souther Europeans who could pass as Arabs and or Turks are equally as wgite as northern Europeans, but state that Somalis and Ethiopians are not equally as black as West Africans? Isn't that hypocritical to say the least?
|
|
|
|
Post by Crimson Guard on Jan 15, 2006 14:42:51 GMT -5
Blacks don't obsess about Egypt's blackness, but rather its the so-called "Meds" here that obsess about Egypt being a Mediterranean civilization, which it is not. Stating that Egypt had what we would call black people today is not obsessing. Why do Meds obsess over Egypt's alleged "Med" origins while stating on the other hand that people like Idi Amin and Wesley Snipes are the only true Negroids? Why do Meds state that souther Europeans who could pass as Arabs and or Turks are equally as wgite as northern Europeans, but state that Somalis and Ethiopians are not equally as black as West Africans? Isn't that hypocritical to say the least? Amazingly your IQ could actually drop even lower...your seriously quite disturbed! |
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 15, 2006 14:48:02 GMT -5
Blacks don't obsess about Egypt's blackness, but rather its the so-called "Meds" here that obsess about Egypt being a Mediterranean civilization, which it is not. Stating that Egypt had what we would call black people today is not obsessing. Why do Meds obsess over Egypt's alleged "Med" origins while stating on the other hand that people like Idi Amin and Wesley Snipes are the only true Negroids? Why do Meds state that souther Europeans who could pass as Arabs and or Turks are equally as wgite as northern Europeans, but state that Somalis and Ethiopians are not equally as black as West Africans? Isn't that hypocritical to say the least? Amazingly your IQ could actually drop even lower...your seriously quite disturbed! Looking at your posts[east Africans are a Caucasoid subrace?] your parents are quite disturbed for not aborting you. |
|
Gamed
New Member
Posts: 47
|
Post by Gamed on Jan 16, 2006 6:22:34 GMT -5
Is it really that inportant to continually stress and proclaim there blackness? I know that some of egyptians look like caucasoid and arab but blacks like to stress on there blackness while on the other hand stating that a true whites looks only like Paul Bettany or people from the Northern Europe. Isn\'t that hypocritical to say the least? So far as I know those blacks who care so much about blackness of Ancient Egyptians arer mostly African Americans and not black Africans. |
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 8:55:41 GMT -5
Blacks don't obsess about Egypt's blackness, but rather its the so-called "Meds" here that obsess about Egypt being a Mediterranean civilization, which it is not. Stating that Egypt had what we would call black people today is not obsessing. Why do Meds obsess over Egypt's alleged "Med" origins while stating on the other hand that people like Idi Amin and Wesley Snipes are the only true Negroids? Why do Meds state that souther Europeans who could pass as Arabs and or Turks are equally as wgite as northern Europeans, but state that Somalis and Ethiopians are not equally as black as West Africans? Isn't that hypocritical to say the least? Turks are Eastern meds and Arabs (some) are indeed caucasoid. Somalis and Ethiopians are negroid people no one says otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 9:11:53 GMT -5
Blacks don't obsess about Egypt's blackness, but rather its the so-called "Meds" here that obsess about Egypt being a Mediterranean civilization, which it is not. Stating that Egypt had what we would call black people today is not obsessing. Why do Meds obsess over Egypt's alleged "Med" origins while stating on the other hand that people like Idi Amin and Wesley Snipes are the only true Negroids? Why do Meds state that souther Europeans who could pass as Arabs and or Turks are equally as wgite as northern Europeans, but state that Somalis and Ethiopians are not equally as black as West Africans? Isn't that hypocritical to say the least? Turks are Eastern meds and Arabs (some) are indeed caucasoid. Somalis and Ethiopians are negroid people no one says otherwise. But most Turks and Arabs are *NOT* white. |
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 9:18:21 GMT -5
Turks are Eastern meds and Arabs (some) are indeed caucasoid. Somalis and Ethiopians are negroid people no one says otherwise. But most Turks and Arabs are *NOT* white. "White" historically is an anglo saxon term so yes they are not anglo saxon looking.If thats what you consider white then so be it. "White" is also not used in Athropology or Genetics. anything esle? |
|
|
|
Post by Planet Asia on Jan 16, 2006 9:22:52 GMT -5
But most Turks and Arabs are *NOT* white. "White" historically is an anglo saxon term so yes they are not anglo saxon looking.If thats what you consider white then so be it. "White" is also not used in Athropology or Genetics. anything esle? Medits who look like Turks and Arabs like to think of themselves as being just as white as anglo-saxons. Why the obsession? |
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Jan 16, 2006 9:25:06 GMT -5
But most Turks and Arabs are *NOT* white. "White" historically is an anglo saxon term so yes they are not anglo saxon looking.If thats what you consider white then so be it. "White" is also not used in Athropology or Genetics. anything esle? I mentioned this in another thread, but I understood that 'white' was first used by Spaniards in the Americas to differentiate themselves from the Amerindians that they met. Eufrenio, Drooperdoo, or any other poster here, Iberian or otherwise, can you verify or debunk this statement? |
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 9:26:33 GMT -5
"White" historically is an anglo saxon term so yes they are not anglo saxon looking.If thats what you consider white then so be it. "White" is also not used in Athropology or Genetics. anything esle? Medits who look like Turks and Arabs like to think of themselves as being just as white as anglo-saxons. Why the obsession? Turks are medits and many "arabs" look like medits. Why the obession with a word that is not valid? Seems to me you enjoy the nazi/racist classifications. |
|
|
|
Post by ratrace on Jan 16, 2006 9:29:23 GMT -5
"White" historically is an anglo saxon term so yes they are not anglo saxon looking.If thats what you consider white then so be it. "White" is also not used in Athropology or Genetics. anything esle? I mentioned this in another thread, but I understood that 'white' was first used by Spaniards in the Americas to differentiate themselves from the Amerindians that they met. Eufrenio, Drooperdoo, or any other poster here, Iberian or otherwise, can you verify or debunk this statement? Welch history with the arrival the anglo saxon.They bare the name which was bestowed upon them by the saxons |
|
