|
Post by korenghen on Dec 11, 2005 17:06:51 GMT -5
can any1 give me sum info as to how much european crusaders crontributed to the dna makeup of middle-easterners? thnks
|
|
|
Post by buddy on Dec 12, 2005 22:58:06 GMT -5
I don't any concrete information but I suspect that it might be more common in Syria and Lebanon as both places served as the sites for most of the battles, and incidentally they also have some of the highest numbers of lighter-haired and lighter-eyed Middle Easterners, along with Turkey, which also served as a stepping stone for European Crusaders journeying to the Holy Land.
|
|
|
Post by OdinofOssetia on Dec 17, 2005 18:08:29 GMT -5
I think you forgot the ancient Slavs who are known to have settled in northern Syria in more significant numbers: michalw.narod.ru/SlavicSpain.htmlTurkey also experienced a significant influx of Slavs, both during the Byzantine period, and later, during the Ottoman times. During the Byzantine period, there was even an ethnic Slavic enclave in what is now north-western Turkey. You are also forgetting that many of the Crusaders you're talking about were hardly that blond either; most were from Italy and France, hardly the hotbeds of blondism.
|
|
|
Post by Funky Kong on Dec 17, 2005 18:17:40 GMT -5
It's probably very neglible, far from what it is usually blown up to.
|
|
|
Post by Yankel on Dec 17, 2005 18:29:24 GMT -5
Actually, Palestinians have more European-specific DNA than Syrian and Lebanese people.
|
|
|
Post by Funky Kong on Dec 17, 2005 18:49:07 GMT -5
Do you have any charts for Syrians and Lebanese?
|
|
|
Post by Yankel on Dec 18, 2005 12:05:52 GMT -5
Not offhand, but I'll see if I can find something. European admixture is really low, though.
|
|