|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Nov 29, 2005 23:18:25 GMT -5
Paris Hilton is even thinner than Eva Longoria so does that mean that you think Paris has the body of an Amerindian woman as well.
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Nov 30, 2005 0:20:00 GMT -5
Which "she" are you referring to ? I was going to post a pic of Giorgia Palmas, but it's really hard to find one in which she has clothes on. However, I'd say she looks interesting here: I would rock Giorgia Palmas world if i had the chance lol.
|
|
|
Post by ivyleak on Nov 30, 2005 0:23:34 GMT -5
no, no, it is something about the skeleton that doesn't look European. It is hard to explain. Her neck is quite short and her long boney arms don't have the robust form of a European. Also, there is a tilt at the waist, like she isn't completely bipedal. True European women have a substantial build. Paris Hilton is not a good example for anthropological studies. She has in innumerable ways altered that which nature has endowed her with.
|
|
|
Post by tonynatuzzi on Nov 30, 2005 0:28:01 GMT -5
One stand up comedian said once that Paris Hilton is so skinny that she has the body of a 10 year old Vietnamese boy.
|
|
|
Post by Mimers on Nov 30, 2005 12:16:40 GMT -5
I remember when I saw an epsiode of Growing Up Gotti where they were in Italy and Victoria found this family who had Gotti as their last name who she thought was her long lost relatives but they weren't,well anyways one of the women in that family had even darkerskin than Eva Longoria. That means nothing really. Her bone structure and features show something NON european...but it's not as obvious as let's say jennifer lopez. If I met her on the street I would think south american or mexican first.
|
|
|
Post by Trog on Dec 3, 2005 20:29:24 GMT -5
no, no, it is something about the skeleton that doesn't look European. It is hard to explain. Her neck is quite short and her long boney arms don't have the robust form of a European. Also, there is a tilt at the waist, like she isn't completely bipedal. True European women have a substantial build. Paris Hilton is not a good example for anthropological studies. She has in innumerable ways altered that which nature has endowed her with. Do you note in "mullatoid" features in her?
|
|
|
Post by ivyleak on Dec 3, 2005 22:50:53 GMT -5
no, no, it is something about the skeleton that doesn't look European. It is hard to explain. Her neck is quite short and her long boney arms don't have the robust form of a European. Also, there is a tilt at the waist, like she isn't completely bipedal. True European women have a substantial build. Paris Hilton is not a good example for anthropological studies. She has in innumerable ways altered that which nature has endowed her with. Do you note in "mullatoid" features in her? No, none
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Jan 3, 2006 0:42:50 GMT -5
Yeah blue eyes are a minority within a minority in Mexico since even most of Mexico's White minority don't have blue eyes since most of Mexico's White are still descendent's of swarthy dark haired and dark eyed Spaniards.Though I am sure a Mexican of French descent might have blue eyes since blue eyes are more common among the French than they are among the Spaniards. In Mexico, when they see a person with blue eyes they think the person is a Jew(Judio) or German(Aleman). They don't think the person is Spanish.
|
|
|
Post by vgambler33 on Jan 3, 2006 0:45:06 GMT -5
[quote author=seizure board=
As much as I want to scream at you for calling Spaniards swarthy, you're actually rather correct. Even in my own family in Mexico, the only blue-eyed people were French.[/quote]
Seizure, how many generations has your family lived in Mexico? What part of Mexico do they reside in ?
|
|