|
Post by galvez on Sept 9, 2004 14:45:51 GMT -5
I just want to point out that I have Northeast Asian ancestry, specifically Chinese ancestry. I am 3% Chinese. The Chinese in me, however, has been completely washed out, to the point that many "Nordish" Americans think I am Irish or whatever.
The reality is that I am racially Mediterranean and I have been observing some tensions between Mediterraneans and South Asians. I just want to say that I profoundly respect South Asians as intelligent and cultured. However, I dislike the way some South Asians latch onto the accomplishments of the Northeast Asians. It is a well-known fact that the Chinese, Koreans and Japanese have higher IQ scores (about a standard deviation or so) than Indians and Bangladeshis, etc. So, these groups should not be trying to steal the history of my ancestors, or putting down Southern Europeans in any way.
They have a glorious history but the attempts to associate with Northern European race-realists, who are often "White geeks" with mediocre lives, and who deep down disrespect them and consider them as tools for their own cause against the White liberals, are counterproductive for their own people and themselves as individuals.
India is very poor and I have learned quite a bit about their culture, to the point that I, unlike others, recognize that they are not a bunch of potentially gifted persons awaiting their opportunities in the U.S. to dominate. There is great diversity in Asia as elsewhere.
Hopefully people can get rid of their racial hangups and try to learn as much as possible about others in a more objective fashion.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Sept 9, 2004 15:20:47 GMT -5
Did you find that through a DNA test or did you track down your ancestors? Is that an allusion to www.gnxp.com?
|
|
|
Post by Anima Eternae on Sept 9, 2004 19:20:27 GMT -5
Don't you mean NE vs SE asians?
South asians are primarily caucasiod (Sri Lanka, India, etc).
I'm 40% Vietnamese, and 60% German/French.
I like NE asians, and I also liked the North Vietnamese and North Thai. Don't care much for Filipinos, Indonesians, or Malays. Yuck.
|
|
|
Post by eufrenio on Sept 10, 2004 15:20:39 GMT -5
I like NE asians, and I also liked the North Vietnamese and North Thai. Don't care much for Filipinos, Indonesians, or Malays. Yuck. What´s wrong with them?
|
|
|
Post by ramsharma on Sept 11, 2004 16:31:13 GMT -5
Well, the gnxp folks are eugenicists, plain and simple. They concede that Northeast Asians, along with the Jewish people, have the highest average IQ on the planet. If you have read Godless' comment, he has said in the past that India will never catch up to China b/c of IQ differences. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think they have looked down upon Southern Europeans in the past. Razib is a social liberal, btw. Gnxp peeps are quite a diverse bunch.
|
|
|
Post by Anima Eternae on Sept 12, 2004 21:22:50 GMT -5
They're dark and not too bright.
|
|
|
Post by galvez on Oct 11, 2004 15:18:50 GMT -5
Well, the gnxp folks are eugenicists, plain and simple. They concede that Northeast Asians, along with the Jewish people, have the highest average IQ on the planet. If you have read Godless' comment, he has said in the past that India will never catch up to China b/c of IQ differences. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think they have looked down upon Southern Europeans in the past. Razib is a social liberal, btw. Gnxp peeps are quite a diverse bunch. You are absolutely correct. And as the GNXP crowd pointed out, India's IQ is multimodal. I realized that my post may have been offensive to the South Asians. Only recently have I realized that they are disproportionately represented on campuses. They are very intelligent people... perhaps some of India's groups have very high IQs... far above the Euro average.
|
|
ak47
Junior Member
Posts: 72
|
Post by ak47 on Oct 19, 2004 11:40:40 GMT -5
the S.E. Asians are more nigga-like (e.g. the Khmers/Cambodians), and are not really honkeyoids, less stereotypically asian (i.e. they don't fit the stereotypes of pale, geeky, effeminate, small peni people that lose their flat chested/faced women to their more masculine & bigger peni honkeyoid brethern the nordics). that's basically what's wrong with them.
|
|
|
Post by vela on Oct 19, 2004 15:28:03 GMT -5
Hopefully people can get rid of their racial hangups and try to learn as much as possible about others in a more objective fashion. Eventually that may come about. But how long will it take for that day? A curious and admirable concept from the mayans was or is the way in which they refer to the second person (i.e. You): “In lakesh”, which literally means "tu eres mi otro yo" or in english "you are my other me". In that sense learning about others is learning about ourselves!
|
|
|
Post by nordicyouth on Oct 19, 2004 16:03:16 GMT -5
What's funny is the gang-fighting occurring between East Asians and South Asians. My city is so multi-cultural that the minorities fight amongst themselves.
Generally, however, South Asians are responsible for a good deal of crime and violence. They are not poor, as they have to invest heavily before entering the country - the gov't. says its because the mothers let the boys do what they want.
So it's not poverty that's the cause here. They just make bad citizens, creating little Indias and raiding the rest of the community - while the daughters are murdered if they don't marry correctly.
|
|
ak47
Junior Member
Posts: 72
|
Post by ak47 on Oct 19, 2004 16:40:49 GMT -5
What's funny is the gang-fighting occurring between East Asians and South Asians. My city is so multi-cultural that the minorities fight amongst themselves. Generally, however, South Asians are responsible for a good deal of crime and violence. They are not poor, as they have to invest heavily before entering the country - the gov't. says its because the mothers let the boys do what they want. So it's not poverty that's the cause here. They just make bad citizens, creating little Indias and raiding the rest of the community - while the daughters are murdered if they don't marry correctly. south asians & east asians are two totally different types of people, in practically every way possible. for example in terms of racial looks Indians are mostly Caucasoid, Africoid, or a mix of the two, whereas Chinese are mostly Mongoloid. but south asians are bad boys?? - maybe compared to east asians - i thought they were sweet and innocent little mommas boys, no ;D ? - although I know Pakistanis & Bangladeshis, you don't f*ck with them when they're in groups. and Tamils are pretty dangerous, atleast most of their brutal killings are infighting (Tamil-on-Tamil). and some sikhs have become pretty militant like the old Holy Smoke in West London. but generally i didn't think Asians did this much.
|
|
|
Post by xxx on Oct 21, 2004 3:54:21 GMT -5
I just want to point out that I have Northeast Asian ancestry, specifically Chinese ancestry. I am 3% Chinese. The Chinese in me, however, has been completely washed out, to the point that many "Nordish" Americans think I am Irish or whatever. You are, after all, an American. And this is what happens when you deal with Americans, they are Europids, but only in part. Do you have any nordid ancestry? That would explain your 3% East Asian genes, aka Mongoloid... or, is Northern East Asian different to the Mongoloid strain from the nordids? :
|
|
|
Post by AMAR187 on Oct 22, 2004 10:22:00 GMT -5
What's funny is the gang-fighting occurring between East Asians and South Asians. My city is so multi-cultural that the minorities fight amongst themselves. Generally, however, South Asians are responsible for a good deal of crime and violence. They are not poor, as they have to invest heavily before entering the country - the gov't. says its because the mothers let the boys do what they want. So it's not poverty that's the cause here. They just make bad citizens, creating little Indias and raiding the rest of the community - while the daughters are murdered if they don't marry correctly. I know Punjabis are very much into crime and violence...where are you from?
|
|
|
Post by AMAR187 on Oct 22, 2004 10:23:49 GMT -5
south asians & east asians are two totally different types of people, in practically every way possible. for example in terms of racial looks Indians are mostly Caucasoid, Africoid, or a mix of the two, whereas Chinese are mostly Mongoloid. but south asians are bad boys?? - maybe compared to east asians - i thought they were sweet and innocent little mommas boys, no ;D ? - although I know Pakistanis & Bangladeshis, you don't f*ck with them when they're in groups. and Tamils are pretty dangerous, atleast most of their brutal killings are infighting (Tamil-on-Tamil). and some sikhs have become pretty militant like the old Holy Smoke in West London. but generally i didn't think Asians did this much. Even Hindus are being bad boys in the London area...but they're pretty sneaky...the credit card/computer frauds etc...are done by Gujratis alot
|
|
|
Post by gbloco on Oct 23, 2004 15:16:42 GMT -5
there is wonderful simplicity to the racial views of most northeast asians. they are the best. caucasians are to be respected although their time has now passed. everyone else is a waste of space.
if you calculate the population of the world with an IQ over 115 (college degree level) it breaks down as follows:
Northeast asia 500 European origin 175 Other caucasians 40 South asians 25 Jews 8 Blacks 5
it is not surprising they are so confident when they have two-thirds of the world's most valuable commodity brains
|
|